Üreme Tıbbında Yapay Zeka
Özet
Üreme tıbbında yapay zeka uygulamaları; sperm, oosit ve embriyo seçim süreçlerini standardize ederek manuel değerlendirmelerdeki hataları minimize etmeyi ve laboratuvar iş yükünü azaltmayı amaçlamaktadır. CASA ve derin öğrenme algoritmaları sayesinde sperm morfolojisi ile embriyo gelişim kalitesi yüksek doğrulukla analiz edilerek klinik gebelik başarı oranları artırılmaktadır. Bu teknolojiler, tıbbi hataların azaltılması ve laboratuvar kalite kontrol süreçlerinin objektif verilerle optimize edilmesi noktasında kritik bir rol oynamaktadır.
Artificial intelligence applications in reproductive medicine aim to standardize the selection processes of sperm, oocytes, and embryos, thereby minimizing human error in manual assessments and reducing laboratory workload. Through CASA and deep learning algorithms, sperm morphology and embryo development quality are analyzed with high accuracy, enhancing clinical pregnancy success rates. These technologies play a critical role in reducing medical errors and optimizing laboratory quality control processes with objective data.
Referanslar
Artificial Solution (2020) (09.09.2021 tarihinde https://www.artificial-solutions.com/blog/homage-to-john-mccarthy-the-father-of-artificial-intelligence adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Fernandez EI, Ferreira AS, Cecílio MH, et al. Artificial intelligence in the IVF laboratory: overview through the application of different types of algorithms for the classification of reproductive data. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;1-18.
Hamet P, Tremblay J. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism. 2017;36-40.
Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Bırth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. The Lancet. 1978;366.
Fainberg J, Kashanian JA. Recent advances in understanding and managing male infertility. F1000Research. 2019;8:1-8.
Jecht EW, Russo JJ. A System for the quantitative Analysis of Human Sperm Motility. Andrologie. 1973;5 3:215-221.
Katz DF, Davis RO, Delandmeter BA, et al. Real-time analysis of sperm motion using automatic video image digitization. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1985;21:173-182.
Amann RP, Katz DF. Reflections on casa after 25 years. Journal of Andrology, Vol. 2004;25:317-325.
Schubert B, Badiou M, Force A. Computer‐aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment. Andologia. 2019:1-14.
Agarwal A, Henkel R, Huang CC, et al. Automation of human semen analysis using a novel artificial intelligence optical microscopic technology. Andoligia. 2019:1-9.
Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FSH, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:1118-1123.
Thirumalaraju P, Bormann CL, Kanakasabapathy M, et al. Automated Sperm Morpshology Testıng Usıng Artıfıcıal Intellıgence. ASRM Abstracts. 2018:432.
Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, et al. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17-18.
Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iacobelli M, et al. Significance of metaphase II human oocyte morphology on ICSI outcome. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1692-700.
Rattanachaiyanont M, Leader A, Le´ veille´ MC. Lack of correlation between oocyte-corona-cumulus complex morphology and nuclear maturity of oocytes collected instimulated cycles for intracytoplasmicsperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:937– 40.
Ebner T, Moser M, Yaman C, et al. Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology is associated with increased rates of implantation and pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:599–603.
Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Qian C, et al. Oocyte morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction. 1996:595-597.
Xia P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: correlation of oocyte grade based on polar body, perivitelline space and cytoplasmic inclusions with fertilization rate and embryo quality. Human Reproduction. 1997: 1750–1755.
Mikkelsen AL, Lindenberg S. Morphology of in-vitro matured oocytes: impact on fertility potential and embryo quality. Human Reproduction. 2001:1714-1718.
Cavalera F, Zanoni M, Merico V, et al. A Neural Network-Based Identification of Developmentally Competent or Incompetent Mouse Fully-Grown Oocytes. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2018;133:1-5. (The video component of this article can be found at https://www.jove.com/video/56668/).
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2011; 22:632– 646.
Wong KM, Repping S, Mastenbroek S. Limitations of Embryo Selection Methods. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32:127–133.
VerMilyea M, Hall JMM, Diakiw SM, et al. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF. Human Reproduction. 2020:770–784.
Kaufmann SJ, Eastaugh JL, Snowden S, et al. The application of neural networks in predicting the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction. 1997:1454–1457.
Bormann CL, Curchoe CL, Thirumalaraju P, et al. Deep learning early warning system for embryo culture conditions and embryologist performance in the ART laboratory. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:1641–1646.2
