Uzaktan Manyetik Navigasyon İle Kalp Atım Bozuklukları Ablasyonu
Özet
Uzaktan manyetik navigasyon sistemi (RMNS), kalp atım bozukluklarının tedavisinde geleneksel manuel yöntemlere kıyasla daha yüksek hassasiyet ve güvenlik sunan modern bir teknolojik platformdur. Bu sistem, esnek bir kateteri manyetik alanlar yardımıyla yönlendirerek operatörün hastaya uzaktan müdahale etmesine olanak tanırken, floroskopi kullanımını azaltarak radyasyon maruziyetini yaklaşık %50 oranında düşürür. Özellikle atriyal fibrilasyon gibi karmaşık aritmilerde perforasyon riskini neredeyse sıfıra indiren bu teknoloji, operatör yorgunluğunu azaltıp işlem konforunu artırarak hem hasta hem de doktor için daha avantajlı bir güvenlik profili sağlar.
Remote magnetic navigation system (RMNS) is a modern technological platform that offers higher precision and safety in the treatment of heart rhythm disorders compared to traditional manual methods. By steering a flexible catheter using magnetic fields, this system allows operators to perform procedures remotely while reducing fluoroscopy usage and radiation exposure by approximately 50%. Especially in complex arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation, this technology nearly eliminates the risk of perforation, enhances procedural comfort by reducing operator fatigue, and provides a superior safety profile for both the patient and the physician.
Referanslar
Nakagawa H, Kautzner J, Natale A, Peichl P, Cihak R, Wichterle D, Ikeda A, Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Jackman WM: Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: Electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrodetissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013;6:746-753.
Di Biase L, Natale A, Barrett C, Tan C, Elayi CS, Ching CK, Wang P, Al-Ahmad A, Arruda M, Burkhardt JD, Wisnoskey BJ, Chowdhury P, De Marco S, Armaganijan L, Litwak KN, Schweikert RA, Cummings JE: Relationship between catheter forces, lesion characteristics, "popping," and char formation: Experience with robotic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009;20:436-440.
Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998;339:659—66.
Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, et al. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation 2004;109:1509—13
Reynolds MR, Zimetbaum P, Josephson ME, et al. Costeffectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:362—9.
Terasawa T, Balk EM, Chung M, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:191—202.
Wyse DG. Rhythm versus rate control trials in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14:S35—9.
Brand FN, Abbott RD, Kannel WB, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of lone atrial fibrillation. 30-year follow-up in the Framingham Study. JAMA 1985; 254:3449—53.
Steinberg JS, Sadaniantz A, Kron J, et al. Analysis of cause-specific mortality in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Circulation 2004; 109:1973—80.
Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1825—33.
Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, Gugliotta F, Mazzone P, Gulletta S, Sora N, Sala S, Marzi A, Augello G, Livolsi L, Santagostino A, Santinelli V: Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1390-1400
Tillander H. Magnetic guidance of a catheter with articulated steel tip. Acta Radiol 1951; 35:62—4.
Chun KR, Wissner E, Koektuerk B, et al. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new irrigated-tip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010; 3:458—64.
Vollmann D, Luthje L, Seegers J, et al. Remote magnetic catheter navigation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with common-type atrial flutter. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009; 2:603—10.
Wood MA, Orlov M, Ramaswamy K, et al. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for ablation of supraventricular tachycardias: a randomized, multicenter trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008; 31:1313—21
Kim AM, Turakhia M, Lu J, et al. Impact of remote magnetic catheter navigation on ablation fluoroscopy and procedure time. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008; 31:1399—404.
Shurrab M, Schilling R, Gang E, Khan EM, Crystal E: Robotics in invasive cardiac electrophysiology. Exp Rev Med Dev 2014;11:375- 381.
Wu Y, Li KL, Zheng J, Zhang CY, Liu XY, Cui ZM, Yu ZM, Wang RX, Wang W: Remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardia: A meta-analysis. Neth Heart J 2015;23:485-490
Di Biase L, Burkhardt DJ, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, Sanchez J, Trivedi C, Gunes M, Gokoglan Y, Gianni C, Horton R, Gallinghouse GJ, Bailey ¨ S, Zagrodzky J, Hao S, Hongo R, Beheiry S, Santangeli P, Casella M, Dello Russo A, Al-Ahmad A, Hranitzky P, Lakkireddy D, Tondo C, Natale A: Scar homogeneization ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: Comparison between remote magnetic navigation and manual ablation. Circulation. 2015;132:A1476.
Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Frigoli E, Giannelli L, Ciaccio C, Baldi M, Zuffada F, Saviano M, Pappone A, Crisa S, Petretta A, Santinelli V: Irrigated-tip magnetic catheter ablation of AF: A long-term prospective study in 130 patients. Heart Rhythm 2011; 8:8-15.
Chun KR, Wissner E, Koektuerk B, Konstantinidou M, Schmidt B, Zerm T, Metzner A, Tilz R, Boczor S, Fuernkranz A, Ouyang F, Kuck KH: Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new irrigated-tip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010; 3:458-464.
Miyazaki S, Shah AJ, Xhaet O, Derval N, Matsuo S, Wright M, Nault I, Forclaz A, Jadidi AS, Knecht S, Rivard L, Liu X, Linton N, Sacher F, Hocini M, Jais P, Haissaguerre M: Remote magnetic navigation with irrigated tip catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010; 3:585-589.
Picano E, Vano E: The radiation issue in cardiology: The time for action is now. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2011; 9:35.
Di Biase L, Fahmy TS, Patel D, et al. Remote magnetic navigation: human experience in pulmonary vein ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:868—74.
Di Biase L, Fahmy TS, Patel D, Bai R, Civello K, Wazni OM, Kanj M, Elayi CS, Ching CK, Khan M, Popova L, Schweikert RA, Cummings JE, Burkhardt JD, Martin DO, Bhargava M, Dresing T, Saliba W, Arruda M, Natale A: Remote magnetic navigation: Human experience in pulmonary vein ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:868-874.
Nolker G, Gutleben KJ, Muntean B, Vogt J, Horstkotte D, Dabiri Abkenari L, Akca F, Szili-Torok T: Novel robotic catheter manipulation system integrated with remote magnetic navigation for fully remote ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias: A two-centre evaluation. Europace 2012; 14:1715-1718
Schmidt B, Chun KR, Tilz RR, et al. Remote navigation systems in electrophysiology. Europace 2008;10(Suppl. 3): iii57—61.
Malcolme-Lawes L, Kanagaratnam P. Robotic navigation and ablation. Minerva Cardioangiol 2010; 58:691—9
Faddis MN, Blume W, Finney J, et al. Novel, magnetically guided catheter for endocardial mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Circulation 2002; 106:2980—5
Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Shah DC, Lambert H, Leo G, Aeby N, Ikeda A, Pitha JV, Sharma T, Lazzara R, Jackman WM: Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008; 1:354-362.
Miyazaki S, Nault I, Haissaguerre M, Hocini M: Atrial fibrillation ablation by aortic retrograde approach using a magnetic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010; 21:455-457
Khan MK, Elmouchi D: Ablation of a resistant right atrial appendage tachycardia using a magnetic navigation system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2013;36: e15-e18
Luthje L, Vollmann D, Seegers J, Sohns C, Hasenfuss G, Zabel M: Interference of remote magnetic catheter navigation and ablation with implanted devices for pacing and defibrillation. Europace 2010; 12:1574- 1580.
Jin Q, Jacobsen PK, Pehrson S, Chen X: Acute and long term outcomes of catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation for the treatment of electrical storm in patients with severe ischemic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2015; 183:11-16.
Eitel C, Hindricks G, Sommer P, et al. Safety of remote magnetic navigation in patients with pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010; 21:1130-5.
Jilek C, Tzeis S, Reents T, et al. Safety of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators in the magnetic field of a novel remote magnetic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010; 21:1136—41.
Miyazaki S, Shah AJ, Xhaet O, et al. Remote magnetic navigation with irrigated tip catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010; 3:585—9
