Jinekoloji Pratiğinde Robotik Cerrahinin Yeri
Özet
Jinekoloji pratiğinde robotik cerrahi, laparoskopinin kısıtlılıklarını aşmak amacıyla geliştirilen ve cerraha yüksek hassasiyetli hareket kabiliyeti ile üç boyutlu görüntüleme sunan ileri bir teknolojidir. Özellikle histerektomi, miyomektomi ve ileri evre endometriozis cerrahilerinde kan kaybını azaltması, iyileşme süresini kısaltması ve cerrahın ergonomisini iyileştirmesi gibi önemli avantajlar sağlamaktadır. Bununla birlikte yüksek kurulum maliyetleri, dokunsal geri bildirim eksikliği ve operasyon öncesi hazırlık süresinin uzunluğu bu sistemin temel dezavantajlarını oluşturmaktadır.
Robotic surgery in gynecological practice is an advanced technology developed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy, providing surgeons with high-precision movement and three-dimensional imaging. It offers significant advantages such as reduced blood loss, shorter recovery times, and improved surgeon ergonomics, particularly in procedures like hysterectomy, myomectomy, and advanced endometriosis surgery. However, high initial costs, the lack of haptic feedback, and long preoperative setup times remain its primary disadvantages.
Referanslar
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2004;18:790–795.
Prasad SM, Prasad SM, Maniar HS, et al. Surgical robotics: impact of motion scaling on task performance. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199: 863–868.
Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, et al. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 2004;18:63–67.
Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: Is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 2002;60:39–45.
UPTODATE (2021). Robot-assisted laparoscopy (13/09/2021 tarihinde https://www.uptodate.com/contents/robot-assistedlaparoscopy?search=robotassisted%20laparoscopy&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~35&usage_type=default&display_rank=1 adresinden ulaşılmıştır.)
Wasson, MN., Magrina, JF. (2020). Robotics. Berek, JS., Berek & Novak’s Gynecology (Sıxteenth edition, pp. 493-509). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer
Anvari M, McKinley C, Stein H. Establishment of the cces’s first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community. Ann Surg 2005;241:460–464.
Rodrigues Netto N Jr, Mitre AI, Lima SV, et al. Telementoring between Brazil and the United States: Initial experience. J Endourol 2003;17:217–220.
Reyes DA, Tang B, Cuschieri A. Minimal ccess surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1–13.
Gofrit ON, Mikahail AA, Zorn KC, et al. Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 2008; 71:404–407.
Morgan MS, Shakir NA, Garcia-Gil M, et al. Single-versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution. World J Urol 2015;33:781–786.
Peiretti M, Zanagnolo V, Bocciolone L, et al. Robotic surgery: Changing the surgical approach for endometrial cancer in a referral cancer center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:427–431.
van der Schatte Olivier RH, Van’t Hullenaar CD, Ruurda JP, et al. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1365–1371.
Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:233–241.
Landeen LB, Bell MC, Hubert HB, et al. Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches. S D Med 2011;64:197–199.
Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:654–658.
Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, et al. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: A comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:256–265.
Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X, et al. Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2007;107:996–1002.
Magrina JF, Espada M, Kho RM, et al. Surgical excision of advanced endometriosis: Perioperative outcomes and impacting factors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:944–950.
Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:1271–1273.
Espada M, Munoz R, Noble BN, et al. Insulation failure in robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation: A prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(2):121.e1–e5.
