Anestezi ve Teletıp
Özet
Bu çalışma, hızla gelişen bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin sağlık sektörüne, özellikle de anesteziyoloji alanına olan yansımalarını incelemektedir. Teletıp; uzaktan erişim, gerçek zamanlı vital bulgu takibi, veri analizi ve hızlı tanı/tedavi imkânları sunarak sağlık hizmetlerinin kalitesini artırmaktadır. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü ve Dünya Tabipler Birliği tarafından da kabul gören bu sistemler; telesağlık, e-sağlık ve mobil sağlık gibi farklı alt dalları içermektedir. Tarihsel süreci 19. yüzyıla dayanan teletıp, günümüzde senkron ve asenkron yöntemlerle uygulanmaktadır. Radyoloji ve psikiyatri gibi branşlarda kullanımı oldukça yaygınken, anesteziyoloji alanında bu oran nispeten daha düşüktür. Ancak anestezi alanında; preoperatif dönemde uzaktan havayolu muayenesi ve hasta hazırlığı, intraoperatif süreçte yapay zekâ destekli monitörizasyon ve telerobotik cerrahi yardımı, postoperatif dönemde ise evde bakım takibi gibi alanlarda teletıp kullanımı giderek önem kazanmaktadır. Algoloji birimlerinde kronik ağrı yönetimi ve elektronik konsültasyonlar da sistemin diğer önemli uygulama alanlarındandır. Teletıp; maliyetleri düşürme, zaman kaybını önleme ve uzman hekime erişimi kolaylaştırma gibi büyük faydalar sağlasa da yasal mevzuat yetersizlikleri, tıbbi malpraktis riskleri, hasta verilerinin güvenliği ve mahremiyet (etik) gibi aşılması gereken bazı kısıtlamalara sahiptir. Özellikle COVID-19 pandemisi bu teknolojilerin kullanımını ivmelendirmiştir. Sonuç olarak, teletıp geleceğin klinik pratiği olma yolunda ilerlemektedir; ancak yaygınlaşması için hukuki ve etik netliklerin acilen sağlanması gerekmektedir.
This study examines the reflections of rapidly developing information and communication technologies on the healthcare sector, particularly in the field of anesthesiology. Telemedicine enhances the quality of healthcare services by providing remote access, real-time vital sign monitoring, data analysis, and rapid diagnosis/treatment opportunities. These systems, endorsed by the World Health Organization and the World Medical Association, encompass various subfields such as telehealth, e-health, and mobile health. With a history dating back to the 19th century, telemedicine is implemented today through synchronous and asynchronous methods. While its usage is widespread in specialties like radiology and psychiatry, the rate is relatively lower in anesthesiology. However, the use of telemedicine in anesthesia is gaining increasing importance in areas such as remote airway examination and patient preparation in the preoperative period, AI-assisted monitoring and telerobotic surgical assistance in the intraoperative process, and home care follow-up during the postoperative period. Chronic pain management in algology units and electronic consultations are other significant application areas of the system. Although telemedicine offers substantial benefits like reducing costs, preventing time loss, and facilitating access to specialists , it faces certain limitations that must be addressed, including inadequate legal frameworks, medical malpractice risks, patient data security, and privacy (ethics) concerns. The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, accelerated the adoption of these technologies. Consequently, telemedicine is on track to become the clinical practice of the future; however, legal and ethical clarity must be urgently established for its widespread integration.
Referanslar
WHO (2020). Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization, editor. Published 2010. Accessed 2020. (10.11.2021 tarihinde https://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_telemedicine_2010.pdf adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
FDA (2020). What is Digital Health? Digital Health Center of Excellence. FDA. Accessed 2020. (12.10.2021 tarihinde https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/what-digital-health adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
De Toledo P, Jiménez S, Del Pozo F, et al. Telemedicine experience for chronic care in COPD. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006 Jul;10(3):567-73. doi: 10.1109/titb.2005.863877. PMID: 16871726.
Moron MJ., Casilari E, Luque R et al. (2005). A wireless monitoring system for pulse-oximetry sensors. Systems Communications (ICW'05, ICHSN'05, ICMCS'05, SENET'05) pp. 79-84, doi: 10.1109/ICW.2005.20.
Health Resources & Services Administration (2020). Telehealth Programs. Official Website of US Health Resources & Services Administration. Accessed 2020. (18.11.2021 tarihinde https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/telehealth adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
WHO (2021). Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable : report of the third global survey on eHealth. WHO Global Observatory for eHealth, World Health Organization. Published 2016. Accessed 2021 (15.11.2021 tarihinde https://www.who.int/goe/publications/global_diffusion/en/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Kane CK, Gillis K. The Use Of Telemedicine By Physicians: Still The Exception Rather Than The Rule. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):1923-1930. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05077. PMID: 30633670.
Global market insights (2019). Telemedicine Market Share Report | Global 2019-2025 (15.11.2021 tarihinde https://www.gminsights.com/toc/detail/telemedicinemarket adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Whaley CM. (2019). Telemedicine and locum tenens opportunities study. Doximity. 2019;17:9.
Wong DT, Kamming D, Salenieks ME et al. Preadmission anesthesia consultation using telemedicine technology: a pilot study. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1605-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00038. PMID: 15166585.
Bridges KH, McSwain JR, Wilson PR. To Infinity and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of Tele-Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):276-284. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004346. PMID: 31397698
Dilisio RP, Dilisio AJ, Weiner MM. Preoperative virtual screening examination of the airway. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Jun;26(4):315-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jun 8. PMID: 24916897.
Mullen-Fortino M, Rising KL, Duckworth J et al. Presurgical Assessment Using Telemedicine Technology: Impact on Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Patient Experience of Care. Telemed J E Health. 2019 Feb;25(2):137-142. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0133. Epub 2018 Jul 26. PMID: 30048210.
Healey T, El-Othmani MM, Healey J et al. Improving Operating Room Efficiency, Part 1: General Managerial and Preoperative Strategies. JBJS Rev. 2015 Oct 20;3(10):e3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00109. PMID: 27490788.
Rothstein DH, Raval MV. Operating room efficiency. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;27(2):79-85. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 8. PMID: 29548356.
Fairley M, Scheinker D, Brandeau ML. Improving the efficiency of the operating room environment with an optimization and machine learning model. Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Dec;22(4):756-767. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9457-3. Epub 2018 Nov 1. PMID: 30387040.
Wu HL, Chang WK, Hu KH et al. A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Anesthetic Procedure Time during Induction. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 4;10(8):e0134838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134838. PMID: 26241647.
Hadjerci O, Hafiane A, Morette N et al. Assistive system based on nerve detection and needle navigation in ultrasound images for regional anesthesia. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal 61(C):64–77, November 2016.
Pesteie M, Lessoway V, Abolmaesumi P et al. Automatic Localization of the Needle Target for Ultrasound-Guided Epidural Injections. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jan;37(1):81-92. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2739110. Epub 2017 Aug 11. PMID: 28809679.
Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılıç-Çakmak E, Akgün Ö, Karadeniz Ş & Demirel F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (11. Baskı). Ankara: Pegam Akademi.
Shademan A, Decker RS, Opfermann JD, Leonard S, Krieger A, Kim PC. Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery. Sci Transl Med. 2016 May 4;8(337):337ra64. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad9398. PMID: 27147588.
Cone SW, Gehr L, Hummel R, Merrell RC. Remote anesthetic monitoring using satellite telecommunications and the Internet. Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1463-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000204303.21165.a4. PMID: 16632827.
Wijnberge M, Geerts BF, Hol L et al. Effect of a Machine Learning-Derived Early Warning System for Intraoperative Hypotension vs Standard Care on Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension During Elective Noncardiac Surgery: The HYPE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1052-1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0592. PMID: 32065827; PMCID: PMC7078808.
Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Alam HB et al. The role of telemedicine in postoperative care. Mhealth. 2018 May 2;4:11. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.04.03. PMID: 29963556; PMCID: PMC5994447.
Lavenberg JG, Leas B, Umscheid CA et al. Assessing preventability in the quest to reduce hospital readmissions. J Hosp Med. 2014 Sep;9(9):598-603. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2226. Epub 2014 Jun 25. PMID: 24961204; PMCID: PMC4234107.
Safavi KC, Ricciardi R, Heng M, Eisenhauer EL, Sheer D, Thompson RW, Del Carmen MG. A Different Kind of Perioperative Surgical Home: Hospital at Home After Surgery. Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):227-229. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003417. PMID: 31318791.
Bujalski J, Klino J, Heitzenrater J et al. Pill dispensing system (2016). (18.12.2021 tarihinde https://patents.google.com/patent/US9283150B2/en?inventor=Joseph+Bujalski&oq=Joseph+Bujalski. adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Eroğlu E ve ark. (2013). Etkili İletişim Teknikleri. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Wilcox ME, Adhikari NK. The effect of telemedicine in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2012 Jul 18;16(4):R127. doi: 10.1186/cc11429. PMID: 22809335; PMCID: PMC3580710.
Küçükparlak İ. Tele Sağlık Uygulamaları, Hukuki ve Etik Yönleri Üzerine Bir Tartışma. Kişisel Sağlık Verileri 4. Ulusal Kongresi. (24-25 Ekim 2020).
Hamm JM, Greene C, Sweeney M, et al. Telemedicine in the emergency department in the era of COVID-19: front-line experiences from 2 institutions. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020;1(6):1630-1636. doi:10.1002/emp2.12204
Novara G, Checcucci E, Crestani A, et al. Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic? European Urology. December 2020:786-811. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.025
Haider Z, Aweid B, Subramanian P et al. Telemedicine in orthopaedics and its potential applications during COVID-19 and beyond: A systematic review, J Telemed Telecare 2020:1357633X2093824. doi:10.1177/1357633×20938241
Tachakra S, Lynch M, Newson R, et al. A comparison of telemedicine with face-to-face consultations for trauma management. J Telemed Telecare 2000:178-181. doi:10.1258/1357633001934591
Chaudhry H, Nadeem S, Mundi R. How Satisfied Are Patients and Surgeons with Telemedicine in Orthopaedic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020:47-56. doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000001494
Ajibade A, Younas H, Pullan M et al. Telemedicine in cardiovascular surgery during COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review and our experience. J Card Surg. 2020:2773-2784. doi:10.1111/jocs.14933
Rasmussen MB, Frost L, Stengaard C, et al. Diagnostic performance and system delay using telemedicine for prehospital diagnosis in triaging and treatment of STEMI. Heart. 2014:711-715. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304576
Ning AY, Cabrera CI, D’Anza B. Telemedicine in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review of Image Quality, Diagnostic Concordance, and Patient and Provider Satisfaction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020:195-204. doi:10.1177/0003489420939590
Eichberg DG, Basil GW, Di L, et al. Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review of the Literature for the COVID-19 Era and Beyond. Neurosurgery. 2020:E1-E12. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa306
Galvez JA, Rehman MA. Telemedicine in anesthesia: an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(4):459-462. doi:10.1097/ACO.0b013e328348717b
