İntraoperatif Hemodinamik Monitörizasyonda Yenilikler
Özet
İntraoperatif hemodinamik monitörizasyon, perioperatif anestezi yönetiminin köşe taşlarından biri olup doku perfüzyonu, atım hacmi ve organ perfüzyonu hakkında hayati bilgiler sunar. Anestezi altında kritik hastalarda temel amaç; hedefe yönelik tedavi algoritmalarıyla dokuya yeterli oksijen sunumunu garanti altına almak, yakın ve uzun dönem mortalite ile morbidite oranlarını azaltmaktır. Kalp debisi ve volüm durumunun optimizasyonu Frank-Starling yasasına dayanır; bu yasa preload bağımlı (sıvı yanıtlılığı olan) ve preload bağımsız (aşırı sıvı yükleme riski taşıyan) hasta gruplarını ayırt etmeyi sağlar. Geleneksel olarak kullanılan statik basınç ölçümleri (SVB ve Pulmoner Arter Kateteri) ön yükü her zaman doğru tahmin edemediği için günümüzde noninvaziv ve minimal invaziv dinamik yöntemler öne çıkmaktadır. Bu kapsamda; mekanik ventilasyondaki solunumsal döngüden yararlanan atım hacmi varyasyonu (SVV) ve nabız basıncı varyasyonu (PPV), pletismografik temelli perfüzyon ile pleth değişkenlik indeksleri (PI ve PVI), EtCO2 takibi, inferior vena kava çap ölçümleri ve kalibrasyonlu/kalibrasyonsuz nabız grafik analiz sistemleri (LiDCO, PiCCO vb.) yaygınlaşmıştır. Ayrıca torasik biyoreaktans, özafagial dopler ve gastrik tonometri gibi dolaylı metotlar da kullanılmaktadır. Yatak başında semi-invaziv olarak uygulanan Transözafagial Ekokardiyografi (TEE) ise sistolik/diyastolik fonksiyonları, kapak lezyonlarını ve miyokard iskemisini anlık olarak görüntüleyerek hem kardiyak hem de yüksek riskli non-kardiyak cerrahilerde inotrop ve sıvı desteğini yönlendiren güçlü bir kılavuzdur. Hemodinamik izlemde tek bir statik değer yerine dinamik trendlerin takibi ve cihazların düzenli kalibrasyonu esastır.
Intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring is a cornerstone of perioperative anesthesia management, providing vital insights into tissue perfusion, stroke volume, and organ perfusion. The primary objective in critical patients under anesthesia is to guarantee adequate oxygen delivery to tissues via goal-directed therapy algorithms, thereby significantly reducing short- and long-term mortality and morbidity rates. Optimization of cardiac output and volume status relies on the Frank-Starling law, which distinguishes between preload-dependent (fluid-responsive) and preload-independent (fluid-overloaded) patient cohorts. Since traditional static pressure measurements, such as Central Venous Pressure (CVP) and Pulmonary Artery Catheters (PAC), fail to consistently predict preload accurately, noninvasive and minimally invasive dynamic methods have gained prominence today. In this context, stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) utilizing respiratory cycles in mechanical ventilation, plethysmographic-based perfusion and pleth variability indexes (PI and PVI), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) tracking, inferior vena cava diameter measurements, and calibrated/uncalibrated pulse contour analysis systems (e.g., LiDCO, PiCCO) have become widespread. Additionally, indirect methods like thoracic bioreactance, esophageal Doppler, and gastric tonometry are utilized. Semi-invasive Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) performs real-time bedside evaluation of systolic/diastolic functions, valvular lesions, and myocardial ischemia, serving as a powerful guide for inotropic and fluid management in both cardiac and high-risk non-cardiac major surgeries. Ultimately, tracking dynamic trends rather than single static values and ensuring regular recalibration of devices remain essential in hemodynamic monitoring.
Referanslar
Brienza N, Biancofiore G, Cavaliere F, et all. Clinical guidelines for perioperative hemodynamic management of non cardiac surgical adult patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Dec;85(12):1315-1333. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13584-5. Epub 2019 Jun 17. PMID: 31213042.
Aseni P, Orsenigo S, Storti E, et all. Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review. Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Oct 23;13:32. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0213-5. PMID: 31660064; PMCID: PMC6806509.
Schroeder RA, Barbeito A, Bar-Yosef S, et all. Cardiovascular Monitoring. In: Miller R.D, Eriksson LI, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, eds. Miller’s Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 1267-328.
Sivrikoz N, Sungur Z. Hemodinamik Monitörizasyonda Yenilikler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Anest Reanim-Special Topics. 2015;8(1):15-19
Ganidağlı S. Kardiyak debi ve fonksiyonlarının izlenmesi. Türk yoğun bakım derneği dergisi. 2006; 4(2):30-37
Marx G, Schindler AW, Mosch C, Albers J, Bauer M, Gnass I, et al. Intravascular volume therapy in adultls: guidelines from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:488–521.
Biais M, et al. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stro¬ke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver trans¬plantation. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(6):761-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen277
Mrarx GCT, McCrossan L. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21: 132–138.
Cannesson M, Besnard C, Durand PG, et al. Relation between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude and arterial pulse pressure in ventilated patients. Crit Care, 9 (2005), pp. R562–R568
Keller G, et al. Ability of pleth variability index to detect hemodynamic changes induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing volunteers. Critical Care, 2008;12(2):R37. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6822
Chu H, Wang Y, Sun Y, Wang G. Accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Jun;30(3):265-74. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9742-3. Epub 2015 Aug 5. PMID: 26242233.
Monnet X, et al. End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test. Intensive Care Med, 2013;39(1):93-100.
Long E, et al. Does respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Shock, 2017;47(5):550-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000801
Schlöglhofer T, Gilly H, Schima H. Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2014 May;61(5):452-79. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0135-8. Epub 2014 Mar 19. PMID: 24643474.
Pearse RM, Ikram K, Barry J. Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO plus method of measuring cardiac output. Crit Care. 2004 Jun;8(3):190-5. doi: 10.1186/cc2852.
Litton E, Morgan M. The PiCCO monitor: a review. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 May;40(3):393-409. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1204000304. PMID: 22577904.
Özeren M, Doğan OV, KeskinA, ve ark. Torasik Elektriksel Bioimpedans ve Ventrikülografi ile Ölçülen Ejeksiyon Fraksiyon Değerlerinin Karşılaştırılması. GKD Cer. Derg. 1995; 3:8-10
Albert NM, Hail MD, Li J, Young JB. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure. Am J Crit Care 2004;13:469-79.
Jones TW, Houghton D, Cassidy S, MacGowan GA, Trenell MI, Jakovljevic DG. Bioreactance is a reliable method for estimating cardiac output at rest and during exercise. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:386–91.
Zhang X, Xuan W, Yin P, Wang L, Wu X, Wu Q. Gastric tonometry guided therapy in critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015;19:22.
Çobanoğlu, Ufuk. Yoğun Bakım Hastalarının Monitorizasyonunda Gelişmeler. Toraks Cerrahisi Bülteni . 2014; 5(3): p151-161
Kesici S, Bayrakçı B. Yoğun Bakımda Monitorizasyonda Yenilikler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr 2011;7:43-8.
Laupland KB, Bands CJ. Utility of esophageal Doppler as a minimally invasive hemodynamic monitor: a review.Can. J. Anesth. 2002; 49: 4, 393-401.
Guarracino F, Baldassarri R. Transesophageal echocardiography in the OR and ICU. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Sep;75(9):518-29. Epub 2009 Apr 27. PMID: 19396054.
