Travmatik Sakrum Fraktürleri ve Yönetimi
Özet
Travmatik sakrum fraktürleri, gençlerde yüksek enerjili, yaşlılarda ise düşük enerjili travmalar sonucu oluşur. Tanı aşamasında özellikle nörolojik olarak sağlam hastalarda kırıkların gözden kaçma oranı %75’e ulaşabildiğinden, ayrıntılı klinik muayene ve bilgisayarlı tomografi kullanımı kritiktir. Sakrum, pelvis ve omurga arasındaki yük aktarımını sağlayan anatomik bir köprüdür; bu bölgedeki yaralanmalar sıklıkla pelvik kırıklarla birlikte görülür. Sınıflandırmada en yaygın kullanılan Denis sistemi, kırıkları foramenlerle ilişkisine göre üç zona ayırırken (Zon 1-3), Roy-Camille sınıflaması üst sakral segmentlerin yer değiştirmesine odaklanır. Nörolojik defisitler, özellikle spinal kanalı etkileyen Zon 3 kırıklarında %56,7 oranında görülerek mesane ve bağırsak disfonksiyonuna yol açabilir. Tedavi yaklaşımı kırığın stabilitesine ve nörolojik duruma göre belirlenir. Stabil kırıklarda konservatif yöntemler yeterliyken, instabilite veya nörolojik kayıp durumunda cerrahi dekompresyon ve spinopelvik fiksasyon yöntemleri uygulanır. Modern cerrahi teknikler, hastaların erken mobilizasyonunu sağlayarak morbiditeyi azaltmayı hedefler.
Traumatic sacral fractures occur due to high-energy traumas in young adults or low-energy traumas in elderly patients. During diagnosis, since the rate of missing fractures in neurologically intact patients can reach 75%, detailed clinical examination and the use of computed tomography are critical. The sacrum is an anatomical bridge providing load transfer between the pelvis and the spine; injuries in this region are frequently seen alongside pelvic fractures. The most common classification system, Denis, divides fractures into three zones based on their relationship with the foramina (Zones 1-3), while the Roy-Camille classification focuses on the displacement of upper sacral segments. Neurological deficits are seen at a rate of 56.7%, particularly in Zone 3 fractures affecting the spinal canal, leading to bladder and bowel dysfunction. The treatment approach is determined by fracture stability and neurological status. While conservative methods are sufficient for stable fractures, surgical decompression and spinopelvic fixation are applied in cases of instability or neurological loss. Modern surgical techniques aim to reduce morbidity by enabling early mobilization of patients.
Referanslar
Bydon M, Fredrickson V, de la Garza-Ramos R, et al. Sacral Fractures. Neurosurgical Focus, 2014; 37(1): E12. doi:10.3171/2014.5.FOCUS1474
Ayten M, Dalbayrak S. Sakrum, Koksiks Travmaları ve Yönetimi. In: Özer AF, Arslantaş A, Dalbayrak S (ed.), Temel Spinal Cerrahi. Ankara: Intertıp Yayınevi; 2016. p. 611-619.
Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T: Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:67–81, 1988
Hak DJ, Baran S, Stahel P. Sacral fractures: current strategies in diagnosis and management. Orthopedics 32:752–757, 2009. doi:10.3928/01477447-20090818-18
Beckmann NM, Chinapuvvula NR. Sacral fractures: classification and management. Emerg Radiol 2017;24:605–617. doi:10.1007/s10140-017-1533-3
Mehta S, Auerbach JD, Born CT, Chin KR. Sacral fractures. J Amer Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14(12):656-665. doi:10.5435/00124635-200611000-00009
Dujardin FH, Hossenbaccus M, Duparc F, Biga N, Thomine JM. Longterm functional prognosis of posterior injuries in high-energy pelvic disruption. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:145-51. doi:10.1097/00005131-199803000-00001
Sar C, Kılıçoğlu Öİ. S1 pediculoiliac screw fixation in instabilities of the sacroiliac complex: biomechanical study and report of two cases. J Orthop Trauma 2001;35:175-8. doi:10.1097/00005131-200304000-00004
Bodkin PA, Choksey MS. Management of a sacral fracture with neurological injury. J Orthop Sci 2006;11:524–8. doi:10.1007/s00776-006-1043-8
Agur AMR: Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy, ed 10. Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999
Gray H: Anatomy of the Human Body. Philadelphia: Lea &Febiger, 1918; Bartleby.com, 2000
Smidt GL, Wei SH, McQuade K, et al: Sacroiliac motion for extreme hip positions. A fresh cadaver study. Spine 22:2073–2082, 1997. doi:10.1097/00007632-199709150-00003
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Gove NK. Surgical Anatomy of the Sacrum. The American Journal of Orthopedics. 2008;37(10):E177-E181
Zindrick MR. Pedicle screw fixation. In: Weilstein SL (ed) The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994:1698.
Diel J, Ortiz O, Losada RA, et al. The Sacrum: Pathologic Spectrum, Multimodality Imaging, and Subspecialty Approach. RadioGraphics 2001; 21:83–104
Jackson H, Burke JT. The sacral foramina. Skeletal Radiol. 1984;11(4):282- 288 doi:10.1007/BF00351354
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Robke J, et al. Radiologic and anatomic evaluation of the anterior sacral foramens and nerve grooves. Spine. 1996;21(4):407-410. doi:10.1097/00007632-199602150-00001
Söyüncü Y, Özkavak İO, Özdemir H, et al. Sacral Fractures and Lumbosacral Dislocation. The Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery. 2017;4(28): p:265-276
Atici Y, Akman YE, Erdogan S, et al. The effect of growing rod lengthening technique on the sagittal spinal and the spinopelvic parameters. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(6):1148-57. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3422-8
Ebraheim NA, Sabry FF, Tosic A. Radiographic evaluation of transverse sacral fractures. Orthopaedics 2001; 24: 1071- 1074
Rizkalla JM, Lines T, Nimmons S. Classifications in Brief: The Denis Classification of Sacral Fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2019 477(9): 2178-2181. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000000861
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Ganga G. et al. Transverse fracture of the upper sacrum: Suicidal jumper’s fracture. Spine. 1985; 10:838-845. doi:10.1097/00007632-198511000-00011
König MA, Jehan S, Boszczyk AA et al. Surgical management of U-shaped sacral fractures: a systematic review of current treatment strategies. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21 :829–36. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2125-7
Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Divi SN, et al. Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 2020 19; 102(16):1454-1463 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01153
Kempen DHR, Delawi D, Altena MC, et al. Neurological outcome after traumatic transverse sacral fractures: A systematic review of 521 patients reported in the literature. JBJS Rev. 2018;6(6):e1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.0011
Bellabarba C, Schildhauer TA, Vaccaro AR, et al. Complications associated with surgical stabilizaiton of high-grade sacral fracture dislocations with spino-pelvic instability. Spine 2006;31(11 suppl):S80-8. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000217949.31762.be
Sapkas GS, Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ: Transverse sacral fractures with anterior displacement. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(3):342-347 doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0528-2
Li P, Qiu D, Shi H, et al. Isolated Decompression for Transverse Sacral Fractures with Cauda Equina Syndrome. Medical Science Monitor. 2019;25:3583-3590. doi:10.12659/MSM.916483
Sasaji T, Yamada N, Iwai K. Sacral fracture causing neurogenic bladder: A case report. Case Reports in Medicene. 2012;2012 587216. doi:10.1155/2012/587216
Mahajan R, Tandon V, Das K, et al. Management of neglected sacral fracture with cauda equina syndrome: Report of two cases with review of literature. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2015;1:15020. doi:10.1038/scsandc.2015.20
Schildhauer T A, Bellabarba C, Nork S E, Barei D P, Routt M L, Jr, Chapman J R. Decompression and lumbopelvic fixation for sacral fracture-dislocations with spino-pelvic dissociation. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(07):447–457.
Gänsslen A, Hüfner T, Krettek C. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of unstable pelvic injuries by conventional fluoroscopy. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2006;18:225–244. doi: 10.1007/s00064-006-1173-3.
König MA, Seidel U, Heini P, Orler R, Quraishi NA, Boszczyk BM (2011) Minimal-invasive percutaneous reduction and trans-sacral screw fixation for U-shaped fractures. J Spinal Disord. 2013 Feb;26(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182318539.
