Yüz Maskelerinin Özel Gereksinimli Bireylerin Günlük İletişiminde Neden Olduğu Zorluklar ve Çözüm Yolları
Özet
COVID-19 salgını döneminde zorunlu hale gelen sosyal mesafe ve yüz maskesi kullanımı, özellikle işitme kayıplı ve özel gereksinimli bireylerin günlük iletişiminde ve yaşam kalitelerinde ciddi olumsuzluklara yol açmıştır. Yüz maskeleri, orta ve yüksek frekanslardaki ses yoğunluğunu azaltarak düşük geçişli bir akustik filtre görevi görmekte, bu da konuşma gürlüğünü düşürüp ses kalitesini zayıflatmaktadır. N95 ve KN95 gibi kalın maskeler yüksek frekanslı seslerde daha fazla akustik zayıflamaya neden olurken, yüzün büyük kısmını kapatmaları sebebiyle kimlik tanıma, duygu analizi ve dudak okuma gibi hayati görsel ipuçlarının kullanılmasını engellemektedir. Bu iletişim yetersizliği, sağlık hizmeti alımında hasta memnuniyetsizliğine ve vokal yorgunluğa yol açmaktadır. Bu zorlukları aşmak için yüz ve dudak hareketlerinin görünmesini sağlayan şeffaf pencereli maskelerin kullanımı, konuşmacıların dinleyici odaklı yavaş ve net konuşma stilini benimsemesi, sanal toplantılarda anlık altyazı desteğinden ve işaret dili tercümesinden yararlanılması önerilmektedir. Ayrıca iletişim kurmadan önce dikkat çekilmesi, gürültüsüz ortamların seçilmesi ve akıllı telefonlardaki ses yükseltici uygulamaların kullanılması gibi stratejiler işitme kayıplı bireylerin sosyal entegrasyonunu ve sağlık hizmetlerinden etkin şekilde yararlanmasını kolaylaştırmaktadır.
The mandatory use of face masks and social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic has caused serious adverse effects on the daily communication and quality of life of individuals with hearing loss and special needs. Face masks act as a low-pass acoustic filter by reducing sound intensity at middle and high frequencies, which decreases speech loudness and weakens voice quality. While thick masks like N95 and KN95 cause more acoustic attenuation in high-frequency sounds, they prevent the use of vital visual cues such as identity recognition, emotion analysis, and lip-reading because they cover most of the face. This communication insufficiency leads to patient dissatisfaction in receiving healthcare services and vocal fatigue. To overcome these challenges, it is recommended to use transparent windowed masks that allow facial and lip movements to be seen, adopt a slow and clear listener-oriented speech style by speakers, and utilize real-time subtitling support and sign language interpretation in virtual meetings. Furthermore, strategies such as drawing attention before communicating, choosing noise-free environments, and using sound amplifier applications on smartphones facilitate the social integration of hearing-impaired individuals and their effective utilization of healthcare services.
Referanslar
Zangmeister CD, Radney JG, Vicenzi EP, Weaver JL. Filtration efficiencies of nanoscale aerosol by cloth mask materials used to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2. ACS nano. 2020;14(7):9188-200.
Rosa BV, Rossi FE, Moura HPdSNd, Santos AMdS, Véras-Silva AS, Ribeiro SLG, et al. Effects of FFP2/N95 face mask on low-and high-load resistance exercise performance in recreational weight lifters. European Journal of Sport Science. 2021:1-9.
Yim W, Cheng D, Patel SH, Kou R, Meng YS, Jokerst JV. KN95 and N95 respirators retain filtration efficiency despite a loss of dipole charge during decontamination. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2020;12(49):54473-80.
Ribeiro VV, Dassie-Leite AP, Pereira EC, Santos ADN, Martins P, de Alencar Irineu R. Effect of wearing a face mask on vocal self-perception during a pandemic. Journal of Voice. 2020.
Shekaraiah S, Suresh K. Effect of Face Mask on Voice Production During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Journal of Voice. 2021.
Heider CA, Álvarez ML, Fuentes‐López E, González CA, León NI, Verástegui DC, et al. Prevalence of Voice Disorders in Healthcare Workers in the Universal Masking COVID‐19 Era. The Laryngoscope. 2021;131(4):E1227-E33.
Fiorella ML, Cavallaro G, Di Nicola V, Quaranta N. Voice Differences When Wearing and Not Wearing a Surgical Mask. Journal of Voice. 2021.
Corey RM, Jones U, Singer AC. Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2020;148(4):2371-5.
Nobrega M, Opice R, Lauletta MM, Nobrega CA. How face masks can affect school performance. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2020;138:110328.
Bottalico P, Murgia S, Puglisi GE, Astolfi A, Kirk KI. Effect of masks on speech intelligibility in auralized classrooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2020;148(5):2878-84.
Nguyen DT, Le P. Determining optimum fly ash content for Stabilized subbase materials in road pavements. Australian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2021:1-11.
Rahne T, Fröhlich L, Plontke S, Wagner L. Influence of face surgical and N95 face masks on speech perception and listening effort in noise. 2021.
Holube I, Fredelake S, Vlaming M, Kollmeier B. Development and analysis of an international speech test signal (ISTS). International journal of audiology. 2010;49(12):891-903.
Hampton T, Crunkhorn R, Lowe N, Bhat J, Hogg E, Afifi W, et al. The negative impact of wearing personal protective equipment on communication during coronavirus disease 2019. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2020;134(7):577-81.
Organization WH. Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease ( COVID-19) and considerations during severe shortages: interim guidance, 6 April 2020. World Health Organization; 2020.
Bruce V, Young A. Understanding face recognition. British journal of psychology. 1986;77(3):305-27.
Dhamecha TI, Singh R, Vatsa M, Kumar A. Recognizing disguised faces: Human and machine evaluation. PloS one. 2014;9(7):e99212.
Carbon C-C. Wearing face masks strongly confuses counterparts in reading emotions. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:2526.
Calbi M, Langiulli N, Ferroni F, Montalti M, Kolesnikov A, Gallese V, et al. The consequences of COVID-19 on social interactions: an online study on face covering. Scientific reports. 2021;11(1):1-10.
Löhler J, Walther LE, Hansen F, Kapp P, Meerpohl J, Wollenberg B, et al. The prevalence of hearing loss and use of hearing aids among adults in Germany: a systematic review. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2019;276(4):945-56.
Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort. Ear and Hearing. 2013;34(5):e52-e64.
Chodosh J, Weinstein BE, Blustein J. Face masks can be devastating for people with hearing loss. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2020.
Tavanai E, Rouhbakhsh N, Roghani Z. A review of the challenges facing people with hearing loss during the COVID-19 outbreak: toward the understanding the helpful solutions. Auditory and Vestibular Research. 2021.
Manchaiah VK, Stephens D, Meredith R. The patient journey of adults with hearing impairment: the patients’ views. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2011;36(3):227-34.
McKee M, Moran C, Zazove P. Overcoming additional barriers to care for deaf and hard of hearing patients during COVID-19. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 2020;146(9):781-2.
Dickson M, Magowan R. Meeting deaf patients' communication needs. Nursing Times. 2014;110(49):12-5.
Goldin A, Weinstein B, Shiman N. Speech blocked by surgical masks becomes a more important issue in the era of COVID-19. Hearing Review. 2020;27(5):8-9.
Mick P, Foley DM, Lin FR. Hearing loss is associated with poorer ratings of patient-physician communication and healthcare quality. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2014;62(11):2207.
Blustein J, Weinstein BE, Chodosh J. Tackling hearing loss to improve the care of older adults. Bmj. 2018;360.
Atcherson SR, Mendel LL, Baltimore WJ, Patro C, Lee S, Pousson M, et al. The effect of conventional and transparent surgical masks on speech understanding in individuals with and without hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2017;28(1):58-67.
Laur A. Healthcare access for deaf patients–The legal and ethical perspectives. Medico-Legal Journal. 2018;86(1):36-41.
WHO. Advice on the use of masks in the contexts of COVID- 19. Published 2020. Accessed June 2020. https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-commu nity-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-con text-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak. 2020.
Scheier DB. Barriers to health care for people with hearing loss: a review of the literature. Journal of the New York State Nurses Association. 2009;40(1):4-11.
Hoffman JM, Yorkston KM, Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, Dudgeon BJ, Chan L. Effect of Communication Disability on Satisfaction With Health Care. 2005.
Chien W, Lin FR. Prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults in the United States. Archives of internal medicine. 2012;172(3):292-3.
Calandruccio L, Van Engen K, Dhar S, Bradlow AR. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker. 2010.
Bradlow AR, Bent T. The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2002;112(1):272-84.
Bradlow AR, Kraus N, Hayes E. Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities. 2003.
Branstetter BK, St. Leger J, Acton D, Stewart J, Houser D, Finneran JJ, et al. Killer whale (Orcinus orca) behavioral audiograms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2017;141(4):2387-98.
Smiljanic R, Sladen D. Acoustic and semantic enhancements for children with cochlear implants. 2013.
Rodman C, Moberly AC, Janse E, Başkent D, Tamati TN. The impact of speaking style on speech recognition in quiet and multi-talker babble in adult cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2020;147(1):101-7.
Eby TL, Arteaga AA, Spankovich C. Otologic and audiologic considerations for COVID-19. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2020;163(1):110-1.
