Ortodontide Relaps (Geri Dönüş) ve Retansiyon (Pekiştirme)
Özet
Ortodontik tedavi sonrasında elde edilen diş konumlarının korunması, periodontal dokuların yeniden şekillenmesi, oklüzal dengenin sağlanması, yaşlanma ve büyüme süreçleri gibi birçok dinamik faktörün etkisi nedeniyle tedavinin en karmaşık aşamasıdır. Tedavi bitiminde dişlerin eski hallerine dönme eğilimi olarak tanımlanan relaps (geri dönüş); periodontal liflerin elastikiyeti, nötr bölgedeki yumuşak doku basınçları ve kraniyofasiyal büyüme gibi etkenlerden kaynaklanmaktadır. Diş eti liflerinin yeni konuma uyum sağlaması için uzun zaman gerekmesi, özellikle rotasyonlu vakalarda relaps riskini artırırken; bu durum uzun süreli retansiyon veya cerrahi lif kesimiyle önlenebilmektedir. Pekiştirme (retansiyon) tedavisinde Hawley ve Essix plakları gibi hareketli apareyler ile çok telli paslanmaz çelik veya fiber takviyeli kompozit sabit koruyucular kullanılmaktadır. Sabit ve hareketli aygıtların estetik, ağız hijyeni ve kırılma direnci açısından farklı avantaj ve dezavantajları bulunmaktadır. Relaps riskinin öngörülemez doğası sebebiyle günümüzde klinisyenler, hastanın ömür boyu ya da düz dişler istendiği sürece retansiyon aygıtı kullanmasını önermekte, bu süreçte hekimin doğru apareyi seçmesi ve hastanın tedavi idamesine tam uyum sağlaması kritik önem taşımaktadır.
Following successful orthodontic treatment, maintaining corrected tooth positions represents a highly challenging phase due to unstable tooth positioning, physiological healing, soft tissue pressures, and continuous lifelong craniofacial growth. Relapse, defined as the return of original malocclusion features, is driven by factors such as periodontal and gingival fiber remodeling, soft tissue forces within the neutral zone, growth, and initial malocclusion severity. To counteract this natural tendency of teeth to return to their former positions, retention treatment utilizing either removable appliances like Hawley and Essix retainers or fixed bonded lingual retainers is routinely required. Removable retainers offer benefits like vertical tooth movement or high aesthetics but may increase plaque accumulation, whereas fixed multi-stranded wires provide reliable compliance-free retention but demand meticulous application and oral hygiene. Because post-treatment relapse remains unpredictable, modern orthodontists frequently recommend lifelong retention, necessitating a shared responsibility where the clinician provides optimal motivation and the patient strictly adheres to the prescribed retainer wear to guarantee long-term stability.
Referanslar
Case CS. Principles of retention in orthodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003 Oct;124(4):352–361. DOI: 10.1016/S0889- 5406(03)00541-9.
Angle EA. Treatment of malocclusion of teeth, 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White Manufacturing Co.; 1907.
Hawley CA. A removable retainer. Int J Orthod 1919;2:291–298. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-348X(19)80039 - 6.
Littlewood SJ, Russell JS, Spencer RS. Why do orthodontic cases relapse? Orthodontic Update 2009;2:43–49.
Melrose C, Millet DT. Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;113:507–514.
Edwards JG. A surgical procedure to eliminate rotational relapse. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 35−46.
Edwards JG. A long-term prospective evaluation of the circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy in alleviating orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 93: 380−387.
Behrents RG, Harris EF, Vaden JL, Williams RA, Kemp DH. Relapse of orthodontic treatment results: growth as an etiological factor. J Charles H Tweed Int Found 1989; 17: 65−80.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence Guidance on the Extraction of Wisdom Teeth. http:// www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/ wisdomteethguidance.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2009.
Ng CST, Wong WKR, Hagg U. Orthodontic treatment of anterior open bite.
Int J Paediatr Dent, 18(2):78-83,2008.
Denison TF, Kokich VG, Shapiro, PA. Stability of maxillary surgery in openbite versus nonopenbite malocclusions. Angle Orthod , 59(1):5-10,1989.
Lopez-Gavito G, Wallen TR, Little RM, Joondeph DR. Anterior open-bite malocclusion: a longitudinal 10-year postretention evaluation of orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod, 87(3):175-186, 1985.
Francisconi MF, Janson G, Freitas KMS, de Oliveira RCG, de Freitas MR, Henriques JFC. Overjet, overbite, and anterior crowding relapses in extraction and nonextraction patients, and their correlations.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146(1), 67-72, 2014.
Yoshizumi J, Sueishi K. Post-treatment Stability in Angle Class III Cases. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll, 57(1), 29-35, 2016.
Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention 9 years in retrospect: part II. Angle Orthod, 1980.
Reitan K. Tissue rearrangement during retention of orthodontically rotated teeth. Angle Orthod 1959; 29: 105–113.
Moss JP.The soft tissue enviroment of teeth and jaws: an experimental and clinical study: Part 1. Br J Orthod 1980; 7: 127–137.
Moss JP.The soft tissue enviroment of teeth and jaws: experimental malocclusion: Parts 2 and 3.
Horrowitz SL, Hixon EH. Physiological recovery following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 1–4.
Melrose C, Millett D.Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 113: 507–514.
Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KW, Huang GJ. Orthodontics E-Book: Current Principles and Techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016.
Pratt, M. C., Kluemper, G. T., & Lindstrom, A. F. (2011). Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 140(2), 196–201.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.035
Wan, J., Wang, T., Pei, X., Wan, Q., Feng, W., & Chen, J. (2017). Speech effects of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers by acoustic analysis: A single-center randomized controlled trial. The Angle Orthodontist, 87(2), 286–292. doi:10.2319/012716-76.1
Sauget E, Covell Jr DA, Boero RP, Lieber WS. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers. Angle Orthod, 67(3):223– 30, 1997. 86. Kesling HD. The philosophy of the tooth positioning appliance. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 31: 297-304, 1945.
Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KW, Huang GJ. Orthodontics E-Book: Current Principles and Techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016.
88. Bennett CJ. Orthodontic Management of Uncrowded Class II Division One Malocclusion in Children. Mosby Elsevier , 2006.
Needham R, Waring DT, Smith J, Malik OH. The invisible Hawley retainer. J Orthod 2015;42:333-41.
Kumar AG, Bansal A. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study. Aust Orthod J 2011;27:52-6.
Chang CS, Al-Awadi S, Ready D, Noar J. An assessment of the effectiveness of mechanical and chemical cleaning of Essix orthodontic retainer. J Orthod 2014;41:110-7.
Sheridan JJ, Armbruster P, Moskowitz E, Nguyen P. Avoiding demineralization and bite alteration from full-coverage plastic appliances. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:444-8.
Ioannidou-Marathiotou I. Thermoplastic retention appliances. A controversial clinical reality. Hellenic Orthod Rev 2011;14:15-27.
Manzon, L., Fratto, G., Rossi, E., & Buccheri, A. (2018). Periodontal health and compliance: A comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 153(6), 852–860.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.025
Hichens L, Rowland H, Williams A, Hollinghurst S, Ewing P, Clark S, et al. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29:372-8.
.Gardner GD, Dunn WJ, Taloumis L. Wear comparison of thermo- plastic materials used for orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod Den-tofacial Orthop 2003;124:294-7.
Al Groosh D, Roudsari GB, Moles DR, Ready D, Noar JH, Pratten J. The prevalence of opportunistic pathogens associated with intrao- ral implants. Lett Appl Microbiol 2011;52:501-5.
Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. Journal of Dental Research. 1955;34(6):849-53.
Knierim R. Invisible lower cuspid to cuspid retainer. The AngleOrthodontist.1973;43(2):218-20.
.Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1965;51(12):901-12.
Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1977;71(4):440-8.
.Årtun J, Zachrisson B. Improving the handling properties of a composite resin for direct bonding. American Journal of Orthodontics.1982;81(4):269-
Zachrisson B. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982;15:247-55.
Durbin DD. Relapse and the need for permanent fixed retention. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2001;35(12):723-7.
Butler J, Dowling P. Orthodontic bonded retainers. Journal of the Irish Dental Association. 2005;51(1):29-32
Renkema AM, Sips ETH, Bronkhorst E, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in the Netherlands. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;31(4):432-7.
Cerny R, Lloyd D. Dentists' opinions on orthodontic retention appliances. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2008;42(7):415-9.
Wong P, Freer T. Patients'attitudes towards compliance with retainer wear. Australian Orthodontic Journal. 2005;21(1):45-53.
Moskowitz EM, Kaner C.Predictable retention for the periodontally compromised patient. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2004;38(1):14-6.
Degirmenci Z, Ozsoy OP. Retention after fixed orthodontic treat- ment. Cumhur Dent J 2009; 12: 83-90.
Årtun J. Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long-term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 112-8.
Zachrisson BJ. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 re-tainer. J Clin Orthod 1995; 29: 39-48.
Anjli P, Sandler J. First Aid for Orthodontic Retainers. Dent Update 2010;37:627–630. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2010.37.9.627.
Patel A, Farhad, B, et al. Bonded Orthodontic Retainers. Ortho Update 2013;6:70–77. DOI: 10.12968/ortu.2013.6.3.70.
Green JIJ. Dental materials: the multi- stranded wire retainer BDJ Team, 2015;1: 15054.
Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108: 207−213.
Zachrisson BU. Multistranded wire bonded retainers: from start to success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 724−727.
Meade MJ, Millett DT. Vacuum-formed retainers: an overview. Dent Update 2015; 42: 24−34.
Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG, Sheridan JJ. Orthodontic retention and stability: a clinical perspective. J Clin Orthod 2007; 41: 125−132.
Lee KD, Mills CM. Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 502−506.
Rose E, Frucht S, Jonas IE. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon- reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 579−583.
Salehi P, Zarif Najafi H, Roeinpeikar SM. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Prog Orthod 2013; 14: 25.
Foek DL, Ozcan M, Krebs E, Sandham A. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 381−390.
Lodha S, Kumar S, Mehta S. Technique tips – Active lingual retainer. Dent Update 2014; 41: 473.
Kravitz ND, Grauer D, Schumacher P, Jo YM. Memotain: a CAD/CAM nickel- titanium lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151: 812−815.
Amundsen OC, Wisth PJ. Clinical pearl: LingLock − the flossable fixed retainer. J Orthod 2005; 32: 241−243.
Moskowitz EM, Park MB, Maestre ME. Direct bonding of Ortho Flextech lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod 2004; 38: 554−556.
Pandis N, Fleming PS, Kloukos D, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Survival of bonded lingual retainers with chemical or photo polymerization over a 2-year period: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 169−175
Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 501−509.
Abudiak H, Shelton A, Spencer RJ, Burns L, Littlewood SJ. A complication with orthodontic fixed retainers: a case report. Ortho Update 2011; 4: 112−117.
Waring DT, Cappelli R. The Manchester positioner − dual retention made easy. J Orthod 2009; 36: 111−114.
Edwards JG. A long term prospective evaluation of the circum- ferential supracrestal fiberotomy in alleviating orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:380–387.
Redlich M, Rahamim E, Gaft A, Shoshan S. The response of supraalveolar gingival collagen to orthodontic rotation move- ment in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:247–255.
Edwards, J.G.: A long-term prospective evaluation of the cir- cumferential supracrestal fiberotomy in alleviating orthodontic relapse, Am. J. Orthod. 93:380-387, 1988.
Reitan, K.: Tissue rearrangement during retention of orthodon- tically rotated teeth, Angle Orthod. 29:105-113, 1959.
Reitan, K.: Clinical and histologic observations on tooth move- ment during and after orthodontic treatment, Am. J. Orthod. 53:721-745, 1967.
Reitan, K.: Principles of retention and avoidance of posttreat- ment relapse, Am. J. Orthod. 55:776-790, 1969.
Edman Tynelius G, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E. Evalua- tion of orthodontic retention capacity after one year of reten- tion - a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 542–7
Edwards JG. A study of the periodontium during orthodontic rotation of teeth. Am J Orthod, 54:441-461, 1968.
Meade, M. J., & Millett, D. T. (2020). Orthodontic Bonded Retainers: a Narrative Review. Dental Update, 47(5), 421–432.doi:10.12968/denu.2020.47.5.421
