Ortodontide Yapay Zeka ve Dijital Tedaviler
Özet
Yapay zeka (YZ) ve dijital teknolojiler, veri analitiği ve üç boyutlu görüntüleme kabiliyetleriyle ortodontik teşhis ve tedavilerde devrim yaratmaktadır. Makinelerin binlerce vaka ile eğitilmesi sayesinde klinisyenlere insan hatalarını en aza indiren son derece doğru karar destek mekanizmaları sunulmaktadır. Bu entegrasyon; lateral sefalometrik analizler, ortodontik ark tellerini bükmek için geliştirilen hassas robotik sistemler ve CBCT görüntülerinde otomatik landmark belirleyen makine öğrenimi modelleri gibi geniş bir yelpazeyi kapsar. Tedavi planlamasında özellikle diş çekimi gerekliliğinin %92-94 gibi yüksek doğruluk oranlarıyla öngörülmesi ve mini vida uygulamaları için cerrahi rehberlerin (guide) tasarlanması başarıyı artırmaktadır. Ortognatik cerrahi süreçlerinde CAD/CAM destekli splint üretimi ve dinamik sanal simülasyonlar multidisipliner diyaloğu kolaylaştırırken; dudak damak yarıklı vakalarda gelişim riskinin saptanmasından konuşma analizine kadar kritik çözümler üretilmektedir. Obstrüktif uyku apnesi teşhisinde ise hava akımı aerodinamiği modellemeleriyle polisomnografi ihtiyacı azaltılmaktadır. Sonuç olarak dijitalleşme klinisyenlerin iş verimliliğini üst seviyeye çıkarsa da, sağlıkla ilgili nihai kararlar her zaman hekimlerin sorumluluğunda kalmaya devam edecektir.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies are revolutionizing orthodontic diagnosis and treatment through their data analytics and three-dimensional imaging capabilities. Training machines with thousands of cases provides clinicians with highly accurate decision-support mechanisms that minimize human errors. This integration covers a wide range, including lateral cephalometric analyses, precise robotic systems developed for bending orthodontic archwires, and machine learning models that automatically identify landmarks on CBCT images. In treatment planning, success is enhanced particularly by predicting the necessity of tooth extraction with high accuracy rates of 92-94% and designing surgical guides for miniscrew applications. In orthognathic surgery processes, CAD/CAM-assisted splint manufacturing and dynamic virtual simulations facilitate multidisciplinary dialogue, while critical solutions are generated for cleft lip and palate cases, ranging from detecting development risks to speech analysis. In obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis, airflow aerodynamics modeling reduces the need for polysomnography. Consequently, although digitalization elevates clinicians' work efficiency to the highest level, final healthcare decisions will always remain the responsibility of the clinicians.
Referanslar
Kaplan A, Haenlein M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Bus Horiz 2019;62(1):15–25.
Bouletreau P, Makaremi M, Ibrahim B, et al. Artificial Intelligence: Applications in orthognathic surgery. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;120(4):347-354. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.001
Chalmers EV, McIntyre GT, Wang W, et al. Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(5):568-577. doi:10.1597/15-036
Woodsend B, Koufoudaki E, Lin P, et al. Development of intra-oral automated landmark recognition (ALR) for dental and occlusal outcome measurements. Eur J Orthod. 2022;44(1):43-50. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjab012
Jyothikiran H, Shanthara JR, Subbiah P, et al. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics--past present and future. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2014;25(1):21-26.
Monill-González A, Rovira-Calatayud L, d'Oliveira NG, et al. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: Where are we now? A scoping review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24 Suppl 2:6-15. doi:10.1111/ocr.12517
Nayyar N, Ojcius DM, Dugoni AA. The Role of Medicine and Technology in Shaping the Future of Oral Health. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2020;48(3):127-130.
Schwendicke F, Golla T, Dreher M, et al. Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: A scoping review. J Dent. 2019;91:103226. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103226
Buschang PH, Asiri SN. The present, past and future of orthodontic research. In Seminars in Orthodontics. 2019;25:326-338.
Kunz F, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Zeman F, et al. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: Evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network. Künstliche Intelligenz in der Kieferorthopädie: Evaluierung einer vollständig automatisierten Fernröntgenseitenanalyse unter Anwendung eines individualisierten convolutional neural network“. J Orofac Orthop. 2020;81(1):52-68. doi:10.1007/s00056-019-00203-8
Bichu YM, Hansa I, Bichu AY, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review. Prog Orthod. 2021;22(1):18. Published 2021 Jul 5. doi:10.1186/s40510-021-00361-9
Vaid NR. Digital technologies in orthodontics–An update. Seminars in Orthodontics 2018;24(4):373-375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2018.10.001
Ghafari JG. “Medically necessary” orthodontic care: challenges and applications. Seminars in Orthodontics 2016;22(3):167-176.
Tarraf NE, Ali DM. Present and the future of digital orthodontics. Seminars in Orthodontics 2018;24(4):376-385.
Machoy ME, Szyszka-Sommerfeld L, Vegh A, et al. The ways of using machine learning in dentistry. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020;29(3):375-384. doi:10.17219/acem/115083
Khanagar SB, Al-Ehaideb A, Maganur PC, et al. Developments, application, and performance of artificial intelligence in dentistry–A systematic review. Journal of dental sciences, 2021;16(1):508-522.
Jia F, Lei Y, Lin J, et al. Deep neural networks: A promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2016;72:303-315.
Xie X, Wang L, Wang A. Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(2):262-266. doi:10.2319/111608-588.1
Jung SK, Kim TW. New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149(1):127-133. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.030
Thanathornwong B. Bayesian-Based Decision Support System for Assessing the Needs for Orthodontic Treatment. Healthc Inform Res. 2018;24(1):22-28. doi:10.4258/hir.2018.24.1.22
Li P, Kong D, Tang T, et al. Orthodontic Treatment Planning based on Artificial Neural Networks. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2037. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-38439-w
Rigelsford J. Robotic bending of orthodontic archwires. Ind. Robot. 2004;31:331–335.
Alford TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, et al. Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile™ method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(3):383-388. doi:10.2319/071810-413.1
Gilbert A. An in-office wire-bending robot for lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod. 2011;45(4):230-236.
Du H, Jia Y, Zhang Y, et al. Trajectory planning of archwire bending robot. China Mech. Eng. 2010;21:1605–1608.
Zhang Y, Wei C, Jiang J, et al. Motion Planning for Archwire Bending Robot in Orthodontic Treatments. Int. J. Control. Autom. 2014;7:287–298.
Ahmad P, Alam MK, Aldajani A, et al. Dental Robotics: A Disruptive Technology. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(10):3308. doi:10.3390/s21103308
Ngan P, Hornbrook R, Weaver B. Early timely management of ectopically erupting maxillary canines. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:152–163.
Bedoya MM, Park JH. A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(12):1485-1493. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0099
Al-Khateeb S, Abu Alhaija ES, Rwaite A, et al. Dental arch parameters of the displacement and nondisplacement sides in subjects with unilateral palatal canine ectopia. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(2):259-265. doi:10.2319/031612-229.1
Yan B, Sun Z, Fields H, et al. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(4):527-534. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.021
Chen S, Wang L, Li G, et al. Machine learning in orthodontics: Introducing a 3D auto-segmentation and auto-landmark finder of CBCT images to assess maxillary constriction in unilateral impacted canine patients. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(1):77-84. doi:10.2319/012919-59.1
Wang L, Gao Y, Shi F, et al. Automated segmentation of dental CBCT image with prior-guided sequential random forests. Med Phys. 2016;43(1):336-346. doi:10.1118/1.4938267
Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, et al. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;10(11):1737-1752. doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1173-6
Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, et al. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod. 2000;70(5):387-392. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0387:COLIIT>2.0.CO;2
Chen YH, Chang HH, Chen YJ, et al. Root contact during insertion of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage increases the failure rate: an animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):99-106. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01418.x
Motoyoshi M, Ueno S, Okazaki K, et al. Bone stress for a mini-implant close to the roots of adjacent teeth--3D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(4):363-368. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.011
D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, et al. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(3):321-335. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00275.x.
Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(10):1156-1162. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01748.x
Bae MJ, Kim JY, Park JT, et al. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(6):893-901. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.018
Su MC, Chang HT. A new model of self-organizing neural networks and its application in data projection. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2001;12(1):153-158. doi:10.1109/72.896805
Yamamoto Y, Nikiforuk PN. A new supervised learning algorithm for multilayered and interconnected neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2000;11(1):36-46. doi:10.1109/72.822508
Choi HI, Jung SK, Baek SH, et al. Artificial Intelligent Model With Neural Network Machine Learning for the Diagnosis of Orthognathic Surgery [published correction appears in J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jun;31(4):1156]. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(7):1986-1989.
Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(5):611-618. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008
Nishimoto S, Sotsuka Y, Kawai K, et al. Personal Computer-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection With Deep Learning, Using Cephalograms on the Internet. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(1):91-95. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004901
Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, et al. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(4):e678-e688. Published 2012 Jul 1. doi:10.4317/medoral.17721
Tanikawa C, Yamashiro T. Development of novel artificial intelligence systems to predict facial morphology after orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment in Japanese patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15853. Published 2021 Aug 4. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95002-w
Hennessy J, Al-Awadhi EA. Clear aligners generations and orthodontic tooth movement. J Orthod. 2016;43(1):68-76. doi:10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000004
Pagani R, Signorino F, Poli PP, et al. The Use of Invisalign® System in the Management of the Orthodontic Treatment before and after Class III Surgical Approach. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016:9231219. doi:10.1155/2016/9231219
Faber J, Miranda L, Faber C et al. Surgery-first orthognathic surgery with computer assisted three-dimensional planning. In: Seminars in Orthodontics. WB Saunders, 2018. p. 430-442.
José Viñas M, Pie de Hierro V, M Ustrell-Torrent J. Superimposition of 3D digital models: A case report. Int Orthod. 2018;16(2):304-313. doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.017
Ganzer N, Feldmann I, Liv P, et al. A novel method for superimposition and measurements on maxillary digital 3D models-studies on validity and reliability. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40(1):45-51. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjx029
Roisin L-C, Bre´zulier D, Sorel O. Controˆle a` distance en orthodontie: fondements et description de la solution Dental MonitoringTM. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 2016;50(3):303–313.
Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34(6):369-375. doi:10.1259/dmfr/17102411
Mossey PA, Clark JD, Gray D. Preliminary investigation of a modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system for assessment of maxillary arch constriction in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25(3):251-257. doi:10.1093/ejo/25.3.251
Chaudhari PK, Dhingra K, Zere E. Digital Presurgical Infant Orthopedics in COVID-19 Crisis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58(10):1331-1334. doi:10.1177/1055665620980230
Shanbhag G, Pandey S, Mehta N, et al. A Virtual Noninvasive Way of Constructing a Nasoalveolar Molding Plate for Cleft Babies, Using Intraoral Scanners, CAD, and Prosthetic Milling. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(2):263-266. doi:10.1177/1055665619886476
Batra P, Gribel BF, Abhinav BA, et al. OrthoAligner "NAM": A Case Series of Presurgical Infant Orthopedics (PSIO) Using Clear Aligners. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(5):646-655. doi:10.1177/1055665619889807
Dhillon H, Chaudhari PK, Dhingra K, et al. Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cleft Care: A Scoping Review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:676490. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.676490
Agarwal S, Hallac RR, Mishra R, et al. Image based detection of craniofacial abnormalities using feature extraction by classical convolutional neural network. In: 2018 IEEE 8th International Conference on Computational Advances in Bio and Medical Sciences (ICCABS). Las Vegas, NV 2018;1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICCABS.2018. 8541948
Zhang Y, Pei Y, Chen S, et al. Volumetric registration based cleft volume estimation of alveolar cleft grafting procedures. In: 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). Iowa City, IA 2020;99-103. doi: 10.1109/ISBI45749.2020. 9098407
Schiebl J, Bauer FX, Grill F, et al. RapidNAM: Algorithm for the Semi-Automated Generation of Nasoalveolar Molding Device Designs for the Presurgical Treatment of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020;67(5):1263-1271. doi:10.1109/TBME.2019.2934907
Wutiwiwatchai C, Chootrakool P, Kasuriya S, et al. Naso-articulometry speech database for cleft-palate speech assessment. In: 2018 Oriental COCOSDA - International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments. Miyazaki 2018;32-36. doi: 10.1109/ICSDA.2018.8693008
Bocklet T, Riedhammer K, Eysholdt U, et al. Automatic phoneme analysis in children with Cleft Lip and Palate. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Vancouver, BC 2013;7572-7576. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6639135
Li Y, Cheng J, Mei H, et al. CLPNet: cleft lip and palate surgery support with deep learning. In: 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2019;3666–3672. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857799
Lin G, Kim PJ, Baek SH, et al. Early Prediction of the Need for Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Machine Learning and Longitudinal Lateral Cephalometric Analysis Data. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):616-620. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006943
Liu WT, Wu HT, Juang JN, et al. Prediction of the severity of obstructive sleep apnea by anthropometric features via support vector machine. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176991. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176991
Kim T, Kim JW, Lee K. Detection of sleep disordered breathing severity using acoustic biomarker and machine learning techniques. Biomed Eng Online 17: 16, 2018.
Urtnasan E, Park JU, Lee S, et al. Optimal classifier for detection of obstructive sleep apnea using a heartbeat signal. Int J FUZZY Log Intell Syst 2017;17:76-81 doi:10.5391/IJFIS.2017.17.2.76.
Yeom SH, Na JS, Jung HD, et al. Computational analysis of airflow dynamics for predicting collapsible sites in the upper airways: machine learning approach. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019;127(4):959-973.
