Ortodontide Kemik Yaşı Tespiti
Özet
Büyüme-gelişim (matürasyon) ve kemik yaşı tayini; ortodontide teşhis, tedavi planlaması ve tedavi zamanlamasının belirlenmesinde kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Kronolojik yaş, bireysel biyolojik gelişimle her zaman paralel gitmediğinden tek başına yetersiz kalmakta ve bu nedenle biyolojik gelişimi yansıtan kemik ve diş yaşları gibi parametreler esas alınmaktadır. Diş hekimliğinde kemik yaşı; aktif iskeletsel büyümeden faydalanılan fonksiyonel ortodontik apareylerin zamanlamasında, implant uygulamaları öncesinde, ortognatik cerrahi ve dental travma vakalarının değerlendirilmesinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. İskeletsel olgunlaşmanın saptanmasında el-bilek radyografileri standart bir yöntem olarak kabul edilmekte ve bu alanda Greulich-Pyle, Tanner-Whitehouse, Björk ile Fishman yöntemleri öne çıkmaktadır. Ayrıca, dental panoramik radyografiler üzerinden Nolla ve Demirjian yöntemleriyle diş gelişim evreleri incelenmekte ve kemik yaşı ile uyumu değerlendirilmektedir. Son yıllarda ise lateral sefalometrik radyografiler üzerinden değerlendirilen servikal vertebral matürasyon yöntemi, ilave bir radyasyon dozu gerektirmemesi ve el-bilek grafileri kadar güvenilir olması nedeniyle önemli bir klinik avantaj sunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak ortodontide doğru tanı ve etkin tedavi için matürasyon aşamalarının doğru yorumlanması ve hastaya en uygun düşük radyasyonlu yöntemin seçilmesi gerekmektedir.
Growth-development (maturation) and bone age determination play a critical role in diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment timing in orthodontics. Since chronological age does not always parallel individual biological development, it remains insufficient on its own, and parameters reflecting biological development, such as bone and dental age, are taken as a basis. Bone age is widely utilized in dentistry for timing functional orthodontic appliances that benefit from active skeletal growth, pre-implant planning, orthognathic surgery, and dental trauma assessments. Hand-wrist radiography is accepted as the standard method for determining skeletal maturation, with the Greulich-Pyle, Tanner-Whitehouse, Björk, and Fishman methods being prominent. Additionally, dental development stages are analyzed using the Nolla and Demirjian methods via panoramic radiographs to evaluate their compatibility with bone age. In recent years, the cervical vertebral maturation method, evaluated through lateral cephalometric radiographs, offers an important clinical advantage by eliminating the need for additional radiation and being as reliable as hand-wrist films. Consequently, accurate interpretation of maturation stages and selecting the most appropriate, low-radiation method are required for precise diagnosis and effective treatment in orthodontics.
Referanslar
Abdel-Kader HM. The reliability of dental x-ray film in assessment of MP3 stages of the pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:427-429.
Patel PS, Chaudhary AR, Dudhia BB, Bhatia PV, Soni NC, Jani YV. Accuracy of two dental and one skeletal age estimation methods in 6-16 year old Gujarati children. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(1):18.
Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:88-112.
Yadav V, Loomba A, Autar R. A comparative evaluation of dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators in North-Indian children. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2017;8(1):26.
Krailassiri S, Anuwongnukroh N, Dechkunakorn S. Relationships between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators in Thai individuals. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(2):155-166.
Bala M, Pathak A, Jain RL. Assessment of skeletal age using MP3 and hand-wrist radiographs and its correlation with dental and chronological ages in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28:95-99.
Haiter-Neto F, Kurita LM, Menezes AV, Casanova MS. Skeletal age assessment: a comparison of 3 methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:5-20.
Hegde DY, Baliga S, Yeluri R, Munshi AK. Digital radiograph of the middle phalanx of the third finger (MP3) region as a tool for skeletal maturity assessment. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23:447-453.
Gilsanz V, Ratib O. Hand bone age: a digital atlas of skeletal maturity, eBook. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2005.
Gupta M, Divyashree R, Abhilash P, A Bijle MN, Murali K. Correlation between chronological age, dental age and skeletal age among monozygoyic and dizygotic twins. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5:16-22.
Shilpa PH, Sunil RS, Sapna K, Kumar NC. Estimation and comparison of dental, skeletal and chronologic age in Bangalore south school going children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013;2:63-68.
Kiran S, Sharma VP, Tandon P, Tikku T, Verma S, Srivastava K. Toestablish the validity of dental age assessment using Nolla’s method on comparing with skeletal age assessed by hand-wrist radiographs. J Orthod Res. 2013;1:11-15.
Uysal T, Sari Z, Ramoglu SI, Basciftci FA. Relationships between dental and skeletal maturity in Turkish subjects. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:657-664.
Şahin Sağlam AM, Gazilerli U. The relationship between dental and skeletal maturity. J Orofac Orthop. 2002;63:454-462.
Basaran G, Ozer T, Hamamci N. Cervical vertebral and dental maturity in Turkish subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:13-20.
Alkhal HA, Wong RW, Rabie AB. Correlation between chronological age, cervical vertebral maturation and Fishman’s skeletal maturity indicators in Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:591-596.
Hägg U, Taranger J. Skeletal stages of the hand and wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38:187-200.
Hägg U, Taranger J. Maturation indicators and pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod. 1982:82:299-309.
Ruf S, Pancherz H.When is the ideal period for Herbst therapy-early or late? Semin Orthod. 2003;9:47-56.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Vangelisti A, Defraia E. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:75-82.
Franchi L, Pavoni C, Faltin K Jr, McNamara JA Jr, Cozza P. Longterm skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:334-340.
Joshi VV, Iyengar AR, Nagesh KS, Gupta J. Comparative study between cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist maturation for the assessment of skeletal age. Rev Clín Pesq Odontol. 2010;6:207-213.
Mendes YB, Bergmann JR, Pellissari MF, Hilgenberg SP, Coelho U. Analysis of skeletal maturation in patients aged 13 to 20 years bymeans of hand wrist radiographs. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010;15:74-79.
Tsukiboshi M. Treatment procedures for delayed replantation. Bryn Grisham, ed. Treatment planning for traumatized teeth. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 2012. p.178-185.
Brown T, Barrett MJ, Grave KC. Facial growth and skeletal maturation at adolescence. Dan Dent J. 1971;75:1121-1122.
Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:58-61.
Sulieman MA. An overview of tooth-bleaching techniques: Chemistry, safety and efficacy. Periodontol 2000. 2008;48:148-169.
Greulich WW. The rationale of assessing the developmental status of children from roentgenograms of the hand and wrist. Child Dev. 1950;21:33-44.
Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic Atlas Of Skeletal Development Of the Hand And Wrist : Stanford University Press; 2 edition; 1959.
Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Healy MJR. A new system for estimating skeletal maturity from the hand and wrist with standards derived from a study of 2600 healthy British children. Part II. The scoring system. Paris, France: International Child Centre; 1962.
Tanner J, Oshman D, Bahhage F, Healy M. Tanner Whitehouse bone age reference values for North American children. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1997;131(5): 34-40.
Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein NH, Cameron N. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 Method). 3rd ed. London: W.B. Saunders, 2001.
Björk A, S. Helm; Prediction of the Age of Maximum Puberal Growth in Body Height. Angle Orthod. 1967;37(2):134-143.
Kök H, İzgi MS. Kemik yaşı ve maturasyon tespiti. Selcuk Dent J. 2020;7:124-133.
Nolla CM. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child. 1960;27:254-266.
Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner J. A new system of dental age assessment. Human Biology. 1973:211-227.
Ruel W, Bench RS. Growth of the cervical vertebrae as related to tongue, face, and denture behavior. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1963; 49(3):183-214.
Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1975;67(4):458-459.
Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:58-66.
Baccettı T, Franchı L, Mc Namara Ja. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:316-323.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):119-129.
Akkan N. Kemik yaşı saptanmasında kullanılan Greuclich-Pyle ve Tanner-Whitehouse metodlarının karşılaştırılması. İ.Ü.Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Diş ve Çene Ortopedisi. 1982;16(1):1-9.
Kaplan A, Yılmaz H. Kemik Yaşı Tayininde Kullanılan Greulich-Pyle ve Tanner-Whitehouse Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması. The Bulletin of Legal Medicine. 2020;25(1):7-16.
Koc A, Karaoglanoglu M, Erdogan M, Kosecik M, Cesur Y. Assessment of bone ages: Is the Greulich-Pyle method sufficient for Turkish boys? Pediatr Int. 2001;43:662-665.
Büken B, Şafak A, Büken E, Yazıcı B, Erkol Z, Erzengin ÖU. Is the Tanner and Whitehouse (TW3) method sufficiently reliable for forensic age determination of Turkish children? Turk J Med Sci. 2010;40(5):797-805.
Güngör OE, Çelikoğlu M, Kale B, Güngör AY, Sarı Zafer. The reliability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas when applied to a Southern Turkish population. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(2):251-254.
Kamal AT, Shaikh A, Fida M. Assessment of skeletal maturity using the calcification stages of permanent mandibular teeth. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018;23(4):1-8.
Haghnegahdar A, Pakshir H, Ghanbari I. Correlation between Skeletal Age and Metacarpal Bones and Metacarpophalangeal Joints Dimensions. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2019;20(3):159-164.
Buken B, Safak AA, Yazici B, Buken E, Mayda AS. Is the assessment of bone age by the Greulich-Pyle method reliable at forensic age estimation for Turkish children? Forensic Sci Int. 2007;173:146-153.
Rozylo-Kalinowska I, Raczka AK, Kalinowski P. Relationship between dental age according to Demirjian and cervical vertebrae maturity in Polish children. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(1):75-83.
Rohmetra A, Jaiswal A, Ishita, Gupta N, Kulsrestha R. Evaluation of relationship between chronological age cervical vertebrae maturation index method and canine calcification stages for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in orthodontic patients. International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry. 2018;4(4):214-221
Doğan FB, Akgünlü F. Kronolojik, Dental ve Iskeletsel Yaş Arasındaki Korelasyonun Değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Dental J. 2019;6(4):420-424.
