Güncel Kavite Dezenfeksiyon Maddeleri Ve Yöntemleri
Özet
Çağdaş diş hekimliğinde doku kaybını en aza indiren konservatif yaklaşımlar, mekanik temizliğin kavitelerde bakterileri tamamen yok etmede yetersiz kalması nedeniyle restorasyon öncesi antibakteriyel kavite dezenfektanlarının kullanımını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Bu amaçla klorheksidin diglukonat (CHX), sodyum hipoklorit (NaOCl), hidrojen peroksit (H2O2), benzalkonyum klorür, iyodin, florür, ozon gibi kimyasal maddelerin yanı sıra lazer, fotodinamik terapi (PDT), propolis ve aloe vera gibi güncel yöntem ve ajanlar kullanılmaktadır. En yaygın dezenfektanlardan olan %2'lik CHX ve NaOCl geniş spektrumlu antibakteriyel etki gösterirken, adeziv sistemlerin diş dokusuna bağlanma dayanımı üzerinde çelişkili veya olumsuz etkiler oluşturabilmektedir. Benzalkonyum klorür, H2O2 ve iyodin solüsyonları hücre duvarı ile bileşenlerini hedef alarak güçlü bakterisid etki sağlarken, florür ise sakkarolitik mikroorganizmaların metabolizmasını engelleyip yeniden mineralizasyon avantajı sunmaktadır. Alternatif non-invaziv yöntemlerden ozon gazı ve görünür ışık ile fotosensitörleri aktive eden PDT, karyojenik bakterileri güvenle elimine ederken bağlanma dayanımını olumsuz etkilememektedir. Lazer uygulamaları (Er:YAG, Diyot, Nd:YAG) termal ve foto-bozuşma etkileriyle derin dentindeki mikroorganizmaları yüksek oranda yok edip bağ gücünü artırabilirken; doğal birer ajan olan propolis ve aloe vera da protein sentezini ya da bakteriyel aktiviteyi engelleyerek başarılı sonuçlar vermektedir. Sonuç olarak, sekonder çürükleri ve postoperatif hassasiyeti önlemek için seçilecek dezenfektanın, antibakteriyel etkinliğinin yanında restoratif materyallerin bağlanma dayanımı ve mikrosızıntısı üzerindeki etkileri de kritik önem taşımaktadır.
Contemporary dentistry focuses on conservative approaches that minimize tissue loss; however, since mechanical preparation alone is insufficient to completely eliminate microorganisms, the use of antibacterial cavity disinfectants before restoration is highly recommended. For this purpose, chemical substances such as chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), benzalkonium chloride, iodine, and fluoride are utilized alongside modern methods and agents including ozone, photodynamic therapy (PDT), lasers, propolis, and aloe vera. While 2% CHX and NaOCl, the most common disinfectants, offer broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, they can exhibit conflicting or negative effects on the bond strength of adhesive systems to tooth structures. Benzalkonium chloride, H2O2, and iodine solutions exert strong bactericidal effects by targeting cell walls and components, whereas fluoride inhibits the metabolic activity of saccharolytic microorganisms and provides remineralization advantages. Among alternative non-invasive methods, ozone gas and PDT—which activates photosensitizers with visible light—safely eliminate cariogenic bacteria without adversely affecting microleakage or bond strength. Laser applications (Er:YAG, Diode, Nd:YAG) reduce bacterial load in deep dentin through thermal and photo-disruptive effects while potentially increasing bond strength, and natural agents like propolis and aloe vera deliver successful results by inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis and activity. Consequently, when selecting a disinfectant to prevent secondary caries and postoperative sensitivity, it is crucial to consider its compatibility with the bond strength and microleakage of restorative materials.
Referanslar
Brännström M. The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. Journal of Endodontics, 1986; 12(10): 475-481.
Anderson MH, Charbeneau GT. A comparison of digital and optical criteria for detecting carious dentin. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1985; 53(5): 643-646.
Boston D, Graver H. Histobacteriological analysis of acid red dye-stainable dentin found beneath intact amalgam restorations. Operative dentistry, 1994; 19: 65-65.
Meiers J, Kresin J. Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Operative dentistry, 1996; 21: 153-159.
Leung RL, Loesche WJ, Charbeneau GT. Effect of Dycal on bacteria in deep carious lesions. Journal of the American Dental Associatio, 1980; 100(2):193-197.
Arslan İ, Baygın Ö. Çocuk Diş Hekimliğinde Kullanilan Kavite Dezenfeksiyon Yöntemleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2019; 29(1):124-132.
Ersin NK, Uzel A, Aykut A, et al. Inhibition of cultivable bacteria by chlorhexidine treatment of dentin lesions treated with the ART technique. Caries research, 2006; 40(2):172-177.
Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2002; 133(2):229-231.
Fure S, Emilson C. Effect of chlorhexidine gel treatment supplemented with chlorhexidine varnish and resin on mutans streptococci and Actinomyces on root surfaces. Caries research, 1990; 24(4):242-247.
Gupta J, Thomas MS, Radhakrishna M et al. Effect of silver diamine fluoride-potassium iodide and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity cleansers on the bond strength and microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Journal of conservative dentistry, 2019; 22(2):201-206.
Sobral M, Garone‐Netto N, Luz M, et al. Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: a preliminary clinical trial. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2005; 32(9): 661-668.
Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L, et al. Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. Journal of dental research, 2005; 84(8):741-746.
Sharma V, Nainan MT, Shivanna V, The effect of cavity disinfectants on the sealing ability of dentin bonding system: An in vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry, 2009; 12(3):109-113.
Tülünoğlu O, Ayhan H, Ölmez A, et al. The effect of cavity disinfectants on microleakage in dentin bonding systems. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 1998; 22(4): 299-305.
Türkün M, Türkün L, Ergücü Z, et al. Is an antibacterial adhesive system more effective than cavity disinfectants? American journal of dentistry, 2006; 19(3):166-170.
Dinç G. Kavite dezenfektanlarının antibakteriyel özellikleri, bağlanma dayanımı ve mikrosızıntı üzerine etkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2012;6:66-75.
Brännström M and Nyborg H. Pulpal reaction to polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate cements used with inlays in deep cavity preparations. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1977; 94(2): 308-310.
Özel E, Yurdagüven H, Say CE, et al.Fosforik asit ve dezenfektan solüsyonların Streptococcus mutabs'a karşı antibakteriyel etkisinin saptanması. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2005; 29(4): 8-14.
Block, SS, Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. 2001: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Türkün M, Türkün L, Ates M. Antibacterial activity of cavity disinfectants. Balk J Stom, 2004; 8(3): 214-219.
Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Uses of inorganic hypochlorite (bleach) in health-care facilities. Clinical microbiology reviews, 1997; 10(4): 597-610.
Çelik Ç, Özel Y, Bağış B, et al. Effect of laser irradiation and cavity disinfectant application on the microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems. Photomedicine and laser surgery, 2010; 28(2): 267-272.
Perdigão J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, et al. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dental Materials, 2000; 16(5):311-323.
Pappas M, Burns DR, Moon PC, et al. Influence of a 3-step tooth disinfection procedure on dentin bond strength. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2005; 93(6): 545-550.
Arslan, S, Yazici, AR, Görücü, J, et al. Effects of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of a silorane-based resin composite. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2011; 12(4):279-286.
Prasansuttiporn T, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, et al. Scrubbing effect of self-etching adhesives on bond strength to NaOCl-treated dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2012; 14(2): 121-127.
van Dijken JW. The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four-year clinical evaluation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1990; 64(2): 148-152.
Cha H-S, Shin D-H, Antibacterial capacity of cavity disinfectants against Streptococcus mutans and their effects on shear bond strength of a self-etch adhesive. Dental materials journal, 2016; 35(1): 147-152.
Botelho MG, The antimicrobial activity of a dentin conditioner combined with antibacterial agents. Operative Dentistry, 2005; 30(1): 75-82.
Bocci VA. Scientific and medical aspects of ozone therapy. State of the art. Archives of medical research, 2006; 37(4): 425-435.
Holmes J, Lynch E. Evidenced based research into ozone treatment in dentistry. An overview. Ozone: the revolution in dentistry, 2004:73-115.
Baysan A, Whiley R, Lynch E. Antimicrobial effect of a novel ozone–generating device on micro–organisms associated with primary root carious lesions in vitro. Caries research, 2000; 34(6):498-501.
Baysan A, Lynch E, Effect of ozone on the oral microbiota and clinical severity of primary root caries. American journal of dentistry, 2004; 17(1):56-60.
Schmidlin PR, Zimmermann J, Bindl A. Effect of ozone on enamel and dentin bond strength. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2005; 7(1):29-32.
Magni E, Ferrari M, Papacchini F, et al. Influence of ozone application on the repair strength of silorane-based and ormocer-based composites. American journal of dentistry, 2010; 23(5): 260-264.
Cadenaro M, Delise C, Antoniolli F, et al. Enamel and dentin bond strength following gaseous ozone application. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2009; 11(4):287-292.
Karakaş SN and Küden C, Comparative Evaluation of Cavities Disinfected with Ozone Gas and Photodynamic Therapy and Restored with Two Different Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements on Microleakage and Color Change. Ozone: Science & Engineering, 2021: 1-10.
Alkhudhairy F, Vohra F, Naseem M, et al. Adhesive bond integrity of dentin conditioned by photobiomodulation and bonded to bioactive restorative material. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2019; 28: 110-113.
Kouchi Y, Ninomiya J, Yasuda H, et al. Location of Streptococcus mutans in the dentinal tubules of open infected root canals. Journal of dental research, 1980; 59(12): 2038-2046.
Lee BS, Lin YW, Chia JS, et al. Bactericidal effects of diode laser on Streptococcus mutans after irradiation through different thickness of dentin. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, 2006; 38(1): 62-69.
Maturo P, Perugia C, Docimo R. Versatility of an 810 nm diode laser in pediatric dentistry. 2013.
Pirnat S.Versatility of an 810 nm diode laser in dentistry: An overview. J Laser Health Acad, 2007; 4(2): 1-9.
Mohan PU, Uloopi K, Vinay C, et al. In vivo comparison of cavity disinfection efficacy with APF gel, Propolis, Diode Laser, and 2% chlorhexidine in primary teeth. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 2016; 7(1): 45-50.
Gutknecht N, Alt T, Slaus G, et al. A Clinical Comparison of the Bactericidal Effect of the Diode Laser and 5% Sodium Hypochlorite in Necrotic Root Canals. Journal of Oral Laser Applications, 2002; 2(3):151-157.
Yukna RA. Lasers in periodontal therapy. Today's FDA: official monthly journal of the Florida Dental Association, 2011; 23(3): 40-41.
Fried D, Ashouri N, Breunig T, et al. Mechanism of water augmentation during IR laser ablation of dental enamel. Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2002; 31(3): 186-193.
Arnabat J, Escribano C, Fenosa A, et al. Bactericidal activity of erbium, chromium: yttrium–scandium–gallium–garnet laser in root canals. Lasers in medical science, 2010; 25(6): 805-810.
Eldeniz A, Ozer F, Hadimli H, et al. Bactericidal efficacy of Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation against Enterococcus faecalis compared with NaOCl irrigation: an ex vivo pilot study. International endodontic journal, 2007; 40(2): 112-119.
Tükün M, Türkün LS, Celik EU, et al. Bactericidal effect of Er, Cr: YSGG laser on Streptococcus mutans. Dental materials journal, 2006; 25(1): 81-86.
Arslan S, Yazici AR, Görücü J, et al. Comparison of the effects of Er, Cr: YSGG laser and different cavity disinfection agents on microleakage of current adhesives. Lasers in medical science, 2012; 27(4):805-811.
Cieplik F, Buchalla W, Hellwig E, et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy as an adjunct for treatment of deep carious lesions—a systematic review. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2017; 18: 54-62.
Nagata JY, Hioka N, Kimura E, et al. Antibacterial photodynamic therapy for dental caries: evaluation of the photosensitizers used and light source properties. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2012; 9(2): 122-131.
Paschoal MA, Lin M, Santos-Pinto L, et al. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy on Streptococcus mutans using curcumin and toluidine blue activated by a novel LED device. Lasers in medical science, 2015; 30(2): 885-890.
Konopka K and Goslinski T, Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. Journal of dental research, 2007; 86(8):694-707.
Vohra F, Bukhari IA, Sheikh SA, et al. Photodynamic activation of irrigation (using different laser prototypes) on push out bond strength of fiber posts. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2020; 30: 101716.
Gursoy H, Ozcakir-Tomruk C, Tanalp J, et al. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry: a literature review. Clinical oral investigations, 2013; 17(4): 1113-1125.
Takasaki A, Mizutani K, Schwarz F. Application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in periodontal and periimplant diseases. Periodontol, 2009;51: 109–140.
Araújo NC, Fontana CR, Bagnato VS, et al. Photodynamic effects of curcumin against cariogenic pathogens. Photomedicine and laser surgery, 2012; 30(7): 393-399.
Méndez DAC, Gutierrez E, Dionísio EJ, et al. Effect of methylene blue-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on dentin caries microcosms. Lasers in medical science, 2018; 33(3):479-487.
Madani L, Sarkisians E, Kiomarsi N, et al. Effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on microleakage of class cavities restored with composite resin. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2018; 23:78-82.
Mori GG, Nunes DC, Castilho LR, et al. Propolis as storage media for avulsed teeth: microscopic and morphometric analysis in rats. Dental Traumatology, 2010; 26(1):80-85.
Verma MK, Pandey RK, Khanna R, et al. The antimicrobial effectiveness of 25% propolis extract in root canal irrigation of primary teeth. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 2014; 32(2):120-124.
Parolia A, Kundabala,M, Rao N, et al. A comparative histological analysis of human pulp following direct pulp capping with Propolis, mineral trioxide aggregate and Dycal. Australian dental journal, 2010; 55(1): 59-64.
Gebaraa E, Pustiglioni AN, De Lima L, et al. Propolis extract as an adjuvant to periodontal treatment. Oral Health Prev Dent, 2003; 1(1):29-35.
Burdock G. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food and Chemical toxicology, 1998; 36(4): 347-363.
Libério SA, Pereira ALA, Araújo MJA, et al. The potential use of propolis as a cariostatic agent and its actions on mutans group streptococci. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 2009; 125(1): 1-9.
Hegde KS, Bhat SS, Rao A, et al. Effect of Propolis on Streptococcus mutans counts: an in vivo study. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2013; 6(1): 22-25.
Awawdeh L, AL‐Beitawi M, Hammad M. Effectiveness of propolis and calcium hydroxide as a short‐term intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis: A laboratory study. Australian Endodontic Journal, 2009; 35(2): 52-58.
Ramasubramanian T, Sivakumar V, Thirumalai A. Antimicrobial activity of Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. against pathogenic microorganisms. J Bio Sci Res, 2010; 4: 251-8.
Arunkumar S, Muthuselvam M. Analysis of phytochemical constituents and antimicrobial activities of Aloe vera L. against clinical pathogens. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009; 5(5): 572-576.
Somboonwong J, Thanamittramanee, S, Jariyapongskul, A, et al., Therapeutic effects of Aloe vera on cutaneous microcirculation and wound healing in second degree burn model in rats. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 2000; 83(4):417-425.
Fani M, Kohanteb J. Inhibitory activity of Aloe vera gel on some clinically isolated cariogenic and periodontopathic bacteria. Journal of oral science, 2012; 54(1): 15-21.
Prabhakar A, Karuna Y, Yavagal C, et al. Cavity disinfection in minimally invasive dentistry-comparative evaluation of Aloe vera and propolis: A randomized clinical trial. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 2015; 6(1): 24-31.
Nouri M-R , Titley KC. Paediatrics-A Review of the Antibacterial Effect of Fluoride. Oral Health, 2003; 93(1): 8-12.
