Tünel Kavite Hazırlığı ve Restorasyonlarının Başarısı Hakkında Detaylı İnceleme
Özet
Tünel kavite preparasyonu, proksimal çürüklerin tedavisinde marjinal sırtı koruyarak dişin bütünlüğünü ve kırılma direncini korumayı amaçlayan minimal invaziv ve konservatif bir yaklaşımdır. Geleneksel kutu veya slot preparasyonlarına alternatif olarak geliştirilen bu yöntem, özellikle çiğneme kuvvetlerine karşı yapısal direncin sürdürülmesinde önemli bir rol oynar. Araştırmalar, preparasyon sonrasında bırakılan okluzo-gingival marjinal sırt kalınlığının kritik bir sınır olduğunu ve 2.5 mm kalınlığın dişin sağlam bir diş kadar güçlü kalmasını sağladığını göstermektedir. Klinik başarıda restoratif materyal seçimi de belirleyici bir etkendir; kompozit rezinler, geleneksel olarak tercih edilen ancak oklüzal yüklemlere karşı zayıf kalan cam iyonomer simanlara kıyasla daha üstün mekanik mukavemet ve marjinal adaptasyon sunmaktadır. Son yıllarda bulk-fill akışkan kompozitlerin kullanımı büzülme stresini azaltarak in vivo başarıyı artırmıştır. Ancak tünel tekniği hekimler için oldukça hassas ve zorlayıcıdır; kısıtlı görüş açısı nedeniyle çürüğün yetersiz uzaklaştırılması, tekrarlayan çürük riskini ve pulpa hasarı olasılığını artırabilir. Bu nedenle, dijital radyografi, dental loop ve mantar uçlu frez gibi modern ekipmanların kullanımı ile doğru vaka seçimi, restorasyonun uzun dönemli başarısını optimize etmede kritik öneme sahiptir.
Tunnel cavity preparation is a minimally invasive and conservative approach in treating proximal caries that aims to maintain the tooth's integrity and fracture resistance by preserving the marginal ridge. Developed as an alternative to traditional box or slot preparations, this method plays a significant role in maintaining structural resistance against occlusal forces. Research indicates that the remaining occluso-gingival marginal ridge thickness after preparation is a critical threshold, and a thickness of 2.5 mm ensures the tooth remains as strong as an intact tooth. The choice of restorative material is also a decisive factor in clinical success; composite resins offer superior mechanical strength and marginal adaptation compared to glass ionomer cements, which are traditionally preferred but remain weak against occlusal loads. In recent years, the use of bulk-fill flowable composites has increased in vivo success by reducing shrinkage stress. However, the tunnel technique is highly sensitive and challenging for clinicians; limited visibility can lead to incomplete caries removal, increasing the risk of recurrent caries and pulpal damage. Therefore, accurate case selection along with the utilization of modern equipment such as digital radiography, dental loops, and mushroom-shaped burs is critical to optimizing the long-term success of the restoration.
Referanslar
Cardoso M, Coelho A, Lima R, et al. Efficacy and Patient's Acceptance of Alternative Methods for Caries Removal-a Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 23;9(11):3407. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113407.
Lai WK, Lu YC, Hsieh CR, et al. Developing Lactic Acid Bacteria as an Oral Healthy Food. Life (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;11(4):268. doi: 10.3390/life11040268.
Chu CH, Lo EC, You DS. Clinical diagnosis of fissure caries with conventional and laser-induced fluorescence techniques. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 May;25(3):355-62. doi: 10.1007/s10103-009-0655-6.
Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry: rationale of cavity design. Oper Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):92-9.
Osborne JW, Summitt JB. Extension for prevention: is it relevant today? Am J Dent. 1998 Aug;11(4):189-96.
Ritter AV, Boushell LW WR. (2018). Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier.
Zarow M, Vadini M, Chojnacka-Brozek A, et al. Effect of Fiber Posts on Stress Distribution of Endodontically Treated Upper Premolars: Finite Element Analysis. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Aug 29;10(9):1708. doi: 10.3390/nano10091708.
Valian A, Moravej-Salehi E, Geramy A, et al. Effect of Extension and Type of Composite-Restored Class II Cavities on Biomechanical Properties of Teeth: A Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Feb;12(2):140-50.
Campaner LM, Silveira MPM, de Andrade GS, et al. Influence of Polymeric Restorative Materials on the Stress Distribution in Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;13(5):758. doi: 10.3390/polym13050758.
Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, et al. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group. Int Dent J. 2012 Oct;62(5):223-43. doi: 10.1111/idj.12007.
Zieniewska I, Maciejczyk M, Zalewska A. The Effect of Selected Dental Materials Used in Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics, Surgery, and Orthodontics as Well as during the Periodontal Treatment on the Redox Balance in the Oral Cavity. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 18;21(24):9684. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249684.
Mackenzie L, Banerjee A. Minimally invasive direct restorations: a practical guide. Br Dent J. 2017 Aug 11;223(3):163-171. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.661.
Chu CH, Mei ML, Cheung C, et al. Restoring proximal caries lesions conservatively with tunnel restorations. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013 Jul 30;5:43-50. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S48567.
Chu CH, Mei ML, Nalliah RP. A survey of practices of tunnel preparation among dentists who attended the 100th FDI Annual World Dental Congress. J Investig Clin Dent. 2015 Feb;6(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12081.
Ebert J, Frankenberger R, Petschelt A. A novel approach for filling tunnel-prepared teeth with composites of two different consistencies: a case presentation. Quintessence Int. 2012 Feb;43(2):93-6.
Knight GM. The tunnel restoration--nine years of clinical experience using capsulated glass ionomer cements. Case report. Aust Dent J. 1992 Aug;37(4):245-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb04738.x.
McComb D. Systematic review of conservative operative caries management strategies. J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):1154-61.
Nicolaisen S, von der Fehr FR, Lunder N, et al.Performance of tunnel restorations at 3-6 years. J Dent. 2000 Aug;28(6):383-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00024-5.
Papa J, Wilson PR, Tyas MJ. Tunnel restorations: a review. J Esthet Dent. 1992;4 Suppl:4-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00708.x.
Wiegand A, Attin T. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations. Dent Mater. 2007 Dec;23(12):1461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.12.004.
Ratledge DK, Kidd EA, Treasure ET. The tunnel restoration. Br Dent J. 2002 Nov 9;193(9):501-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801609.
Preusse PJ, Winter J, Amend S, et al. Class II resin composite restorations-tunnel vs. box-only in vitro and in vivo. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Feb;25(2):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03649-y.
Palamara JE, Palamara D, Messer HH. Strains in the marginal ridge during occlusal loading. Aust Dent J. 2002 Sep;47(3):218-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00332.x.
Covey D, Schulein TM, Kohout FJ. Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Feb;118(2):199-202. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0226.
Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki B, Oskoui SS, et al. The effect of marginal ridge thickness on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated, composite restored maxillary premolars. Oper Dent. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):285-90. doi: 10.2341/06-83.
Chalmers JM. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 2. Strategies for addressing restorative challenges in older patients. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006 Jun;72(5):435-40.
Ji W, Chen Z, Frencken JE. Strength of tunnel-restored teeth with different materials and marginal ridge height. Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1363-70. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.007.
Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Efficacy of tunnel restorations in the removal of caries. Quintessence Int. 1993 Oct;24(10):715-9.
Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH, et al. Tunnel restorations versus class II restorations for small proximal lesions: a comparison of tooth strengths. Quintessence Int. 1993 Feb;24(2):93-8.
Strand GV, Tveit AB, Gjerdet NR, et al. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations. Int Dent J. 1995 Apr;45(2):117-23.
Strand GV, Tveit AB, Eide GE. Cavity design and dimensions of tunnel preparations versus composite resin Class-II preparations. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995 Aug;53(4):217-21. doi: 10.3109/00016359509005975.
Kinomoto Y, Inoue Y, Ebisu S. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Dent. 2004 Aug;17(4):253-6.
Pilebro CE, van Dijken JW. Analysis of factors affecting failure of glass cermet tunnel restorations in a multi-center study. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 Jun;5(2):96-101. doi: 10.1007/s007840100106.
Hörsted-Bindslev P, Heyde-Petersen B, Simonsen P, et al. Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):233-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0011-6.
Holst A, Brännström M. Restoration of small proximal dentin lesions with the tunnel technique. A 3-year clinical study performed in Public Dental Service clinics. Swed Dent J. 1998;22(4):143-8.
Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Heft MW, et al. Restorative treatment thresholds for interproximal primary caries based on radiographic images: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Gen Dent. 2009 Nov-Dec;57(6):654-63
Sundberg H, Mejàre I, Espelid I, et al. Swedish dentists' decisions on preparation techniques and restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000 Jun;58(3):135-41. doi: 10.1080/000163500429271.
Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Espelid I. Changes in the treatment concept for approximal caries from 1983 to 2009 in Norway. Caries Res. 2011;45(2):113-20. doi: 10.1159/000324810.
Kielbassa AM, Ulrich I, Werth VD, et al.External and internal resin infiltration of natural proximal subsurface caries lesions: A valuable enhancement of the internal tunnel restoration. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(5):357-368. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a37799.
Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study. Swed Dent J. 1998;22(1-2):1-7.
Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: a long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. J Dent. 1995 Aug;23(4):213-5. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)91185-p.
Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth. Swed Dent J. 1993;17(5):173-82.
Wang Y, Yang PS. [Clinical evaluation of tunnel-restoration]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2003 Feb;12(1):7-8. Chinese.
Jones SE. The theory and practice of internal 'tunnel' restorations: a review of the literature and observations on clinical performance over eight years in practice. Prim Dent Care. 1999 Jul;6(3):93-100. PMID: 11819878.
Strand GV, Nordbø H, Leirskar J, et al. Tunnel restorations placed in routine practice and observed for 24 to 54 months. Quintessence Int. 2000 Jul-Aug;31(7):453-60.
Chu CH, King NM, Lee AM, et al. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements. Quintessence Int. 1996 Jul;27(7):493-501.
Chalker SA, Lumley PJ. An in vitro assessment of cavity margin finishing and marginal adaptation of tunnel restorations. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1993 Jun;1(4):151-6.
Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012 Aug;14(5):407-31. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28390.
Fasbinder DJ, Davis RD, Burgess JO. Marginal ridge strength in Class II tunnel restorations. Am J Dent. 1991 Apr;4(2):77-82.
Chu CH, Yeung CY, Lo EC. Monitoring patient satisfaction with university dental services under two fee-paying systems. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;29(5):390-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290509.x.
Chu CH, Chow TW. Esthetic designs of removable partial dentures. Gen Dent. 2003 Jul-Aug;51(4):322-4.
Pyk N, Mejàre I. Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate. Acta Odontol Scand. 1999 Aug;57(4):195-200. doi: 10.1080/000163599428779.
Kaisarly D, Meierhofer D, El Gezawi M, et al. Effects of flowable liners on the shrinkage vectors of bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Aug;25(8):4927-4940. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03801-2.
Moazzami SM, Sarabi N, Hajizadeh H, et al. Efficacy of four lining materials in sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):256-63. doi: 10.2341/11-495-L.
Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Pelka M, et al. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 1999 Dec;3(4):208-15. doi: 10.1007/s007840050103.
Strand GV, Tveit AB, Espelid I. Variations among operators in the performance of tunnel preparations in vitro. Scand J Dent Res. 1994 Jun;102(3):151-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01171.x.
