Hücre Ayırma Stratejileri
Özet
Heterojen biyolojik yapılardaki farklı hücre tiplerinin ayrılması, moleküler hücre biyolojisinde, tanı ve tedavi alanlarında kritik öneme sahiptir. Geleneksel hücre ayırma stratejileri akış sitometrisinden köken almakta olup, hücre dışı yüzey antijenlerini hedefleyen floresans ve manyetik temelli etiketleme sistemlerine dayanır. 1950'lerde Coulter sayacı ile temelleri atılan bu konvansiyonel sistemler, yüksek verimlilik ve hızlı sonuç sağlama gibi avantajlara sahip olsalar da yüksek maliyet, karmaşık cihaz yapıları, uzmanlık gereksinimi, fazla reaktif tüketimi ve etiketlerin hücre davranışını manipüle etme riski gibi kısıtlılıklar barındırır. Bu dezavantajların üstesinden gelmek adına, iki binli yıllardan itibaren dış etiketlere ihtiyaç duymayan "çip üstündeki laboratuvar" (lab-on-chip) gibi güncel mikroakışkan teknolojileri geliştirilmiştir. Etiketsiz hücre ayırma stratejileri; hücre boyutu, şekli, yoğunluğu, elektrik iletkenliği ve elektriksel geçirgenliği gibi intrinsik fiziksel özellikleri kullanarak mikro-ölçekli filtreler, hidrodinamik filtrasyon, deterministik lateral yer değiştirme, akustoforez ve dielektroforez gibi yöntemlerle manipülasyon sağlar. Silikon veya polimer esaslı malzemelerden mikrofabrikasyon teknikleriyle üretilen bu taşınabilir sistemler; daha az örnek tüketimiyle ekonomik avantaj sunmanın yanı sıra yüksek performans, gerçek zamanlı veri eldesi ve in vivo klinik kullanım potansiyeli taşımaktadır.
In cells sorting methods, conventional approaches rely on flow cytometry, using fluorescence- and magnetic-based labeling systems that target extracellular structures like surface antigens. These traditional systems, originating from the Coulter counter in the 1950s, offer high efficiency and rapid data acquisition but face limitations including complex instrumentation, high costs, user expertise training requirements, large sample volumes, and the risk of labels altering cell behavior. To overcome these issues, advanced microfluidic technologies like "lab-on-chip" devices have emerged since the early 2000s, eliminating external tags. These label-free strategies leverage cells' intrinsic physical biological properties—such as size, shape, density, electrical conductivity, and permittivity—employing micro-scale filters, hydrodynamic filtration, deterministic lateral displacement, acoustophoresis, and dielectrophoresis. Fabricated from silicon or polymer substrates via microfabrication, these portable devices optimize performance, enable automation, reduce reagent consumption, allow real-time data acquisition, and offer biocompatible potential for in vivo clinical applications.
Referanslar
Krens SF, Heisenberg CP. Cell sorting in development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2011;95:189-213. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385065-2.00006-2. PMID: 21501752.
Maes E, Cools N, Willems H, Baggerman G. FACS-BasedProteomicsEnablesProfiling of Proteins in Rare Cell Populations. Int J MolSci. 2020;21(18):6557. Published 2020 Sep 8. doi:10.3390/ijms21186557
Shen MJ, Olsthoorn RCL, Zeng Y, Bakkum T, Kros A, Boyle AL. Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting Using Coiled-CoilPeptides: An AlternativeStrategyforIsolatingCellswith High EfficiencyandSpecificity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(10):11621-11630. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c22185
Don M. The Coulter Principle: Foundation of an Industry. JALA: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation. 2003;8(6):72-81. doi:10.1016/s1535-5535(03)00023-6
Vembadi A, Menachery A, Qasaimeh MA. Cell Cytometry: Review and Perspective on Biotechnological Advances. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:147. Published 2019 Jun 18. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00147.
Maciorowski Z, Chattopadhyay PK, Jain P. Basic Multicolor Flow Cytometry. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2017 Apr 3;117:5.4.1-5.4.38. doi: 10.1002/cpim.26. PMID: 28369683.
McKinnon KM. Flow Cytometry: An Overview. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2018;120:5.1.1-5.1.11. Published 2018 Feb 21. doi:10.1002/cpim.40
Borlido L, Azevedo AM, Roque AC, Aires-Barros MR. Magnetic separations in biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv. 2013 Dec;31(8):1374-85. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 6. PMID: 23747736.
Pan J, Wan J. Methodological comparison of FACS and MACS isolation of enriched microglia and astrocytes from mouse brain. J Immunol Methods. 2020 Nov;486:112834. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2020.112834. Epub 2020 Aug 15. PMID: 32810482.
Schulte TH, Bardell RL, Weigl BH. Microfluidic technologies in clinical diagnostics. Clin Chim Acta. 2002 Jul;321(1-2):1-10. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00093-1. PMID: 12031585.
Jayamohan H, Sant HJ, Gale BK. Applications of microfluidics for molecular diagnostics. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;949:305-334. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-134-9_20.
Minteer, Shelley. (2006). Microfluidic Techniques: Reviews and Protocols.
Velve-Casquillas G, Le Berre M, Piel M, Tran PT. Microfluidic tools for cell biological research. Nano Today. 2010;5(1):28-47. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2009.12.001.
Hou, X., Zhang, Y., Santiago, Gd. et al. Interplay between materials and microfluidics. Nat Rev Mater 2, 17016 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.16.
Nielsen JB, Hanson RL, Almughamsi HM, Pang C, Fish TR, Woolley AT. Microfluidics: Innovations in Materials and Their Fabrication and Functionalization. Anal Chem. 2020;92(1):150-168. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04986.
Squires, Todd & Quake, Stephen. (2005). Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Reviews of Modern Physics. 77. 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.977.
Merrin J. Frontiers in Microfluidics, a Teaching Resource Review. Bioengineering (Basel). 2019;6(4):109. Published 2019 Dec 3. doi:10.3390/bioengineering6040109.
Ji HM, Samper V, Chen Y, Heng CK, Lim TM, Yobas L. Silicon-based microfilters for whole blood cell separation. Biomed Microdevices. 2008 Apr;10(2):251-7. doi: 10.1007/s10544-007-9131-x. PMID: 17914675.
Rawal S, Ao Z, Datar RH, Agarwal A. Microfilter-Based Capture and Release of Viable Circulating Tumor Cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1634:93-105. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7144-2_7. PMID: 28819843.
Yang S, Undar A, Zahn JD. A microfluidic device for continuous, real time blood plasma separation. Lab Chip. 2006 Jul;6(7):871-80. doi: 10.1039/b516401j. Epub 2006 Apr 19. PMID: 16804591.
Yoon K, Jung HW, Chun MS. Two-phase flow in microfluidic-chip design of hydrodynamic filtration for cell particle sorting. Electrophoresis. 2020 Jun;41(10-11):1002-1010. doi: 10.1002/elps.201900394. Epub 2020 Mar 9. PMID: 32097495.
McGrath J, Jimenez M, Bridle H. Deterministic lateral displacement for particle separation: a review. Lab Chip. 2014 Nov 7;14(21):4139-58. doi: 10.1039/c4lc00939h. PMID: 25212386.
Hochstetter A, Vernekar R, Austin RH, Becker H, Beech JP, Fedosov DA, Gompper G, Kim SC, Smith JT, Stolovitzky G, Tegenfeldt JO, Wunsch BH, Zeming KK, Krüger T, Inglis DW. Deterministic Lateral Displacement: Challenges and Perspectives. ACS Nano. 2020 Sep 22;14(9):10784-10795. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c05186. Epub 2020 Aug 26. PMID: 32844655.
Dual J, Hahn P, Leibacher I, Möller D, Schwarz T, Wang J. Acoustofluidics 19: ultrasonic microrobotics in cavities: devices and numerical simulation. Lab Chip. 2012 Oct 21;12(20):4010-21. doi: 10.1039/c2lc40733g. PMID: 22971740.
Nilsson A, Petersson F, Jönsson H, Laurell T. Acoustic control of suspended particles in micro fluidic chips. Lab Chip. 2004 Apr;4(2):131-5. doi: 10.1039/b313493h. Epub 2004 Feb 9. PMID: 15052353.
Alshareef M, Metrakos N, Juarez Perez E, et al. Separation of tumor cells with dielectrophoresis-based microfluidic chip. Biomicrofluidics. 2013;7(1):11803. Published 2013 Jan 9. doi:10.1063/1.4774312.
Chan JY, Ahmad Kayani AB, Md Ali MA, et al. Dielectrophoresis-based microfluidic platforms for cancer diagnostics. Biomicrofluidics. 2018;12(1):011503. Published 2018 Feb 23. doi:10.1063/1.5010158
