Kromozomal Mikroarray ve Tıpta Kullanımı

Yazarlar

Özet

Kromozomal mikroarray (KMA) tekniği, bütün kromozomlar boyunca dağılmış moleküler belirteçleri kullanarak submikroskobik delesyon, duplikasyon ve dengesiz yeniden düzenlenmeleri belirleyen üstün bir moleküler karyotipleme metodudur. Geleneksel G bantlama yöntemi ancak 5-10 Mb büyüklüğündeki anomalileri saptayabilirken, KMA kilobaz aralığındaki kopya sayısı varyasyonlarını (CNV) başarıyla tespit eder. Günümüzde prenatal ve postnatal genetik tanıda yaygınlaşan bu teknoloji, özellikle aCGH ve SNP array olmak üzere iki temel yaklaşımla uygulanmaktadır. KMA; otizm spektrum bozukluğu, gelişme geriliği, entelektüel yetersizlik, çoklu konjenital anomaliler ve ultrasonografide yapısal anomali saptanan fetuslar için kılavuzlarda birinci basamak klinik test olarak önerilmektedir. Yapılan geniş kapsamlı prenatal çalışmalar, USG anomalisi olan fetuslarda KMA’nın patojenik bulguları saptama oranını %6-7 artırdığını göstermektedir. Postnatal dönemde ise geleneksel yöntemlerin %3-5 olan başarı oranına karşılık, KMA nörogelişimsel bozukluğu olan çocukların %15-20'sinde etiyolojiyi aydınlatabilmektedir. Hücre kültürüne ihtiyaç duymadan doğrudan DNA'dan hızlı sonuç veren bu yöntem, dengeli kromozomal translokasyonları ve nokta mutasyonlarını ise saptayamamaktadır.

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) technique is an advanced molecular karyotyping method that detects submicroscopic deletions, duplications, and unbalanced rearrangements using molecular markers distributed across all chromosomes. While conventional G-banding can only capture anomalies of 5-10 Mb in size, CMA successfully identifies copy number variations (CNVs) in the kilobase range. Increasingly integrated into prenatal and postnatal genetic diagnosis, this technology is utilized through two main platforms: aCGH and SNP array. CMA is recommended as a first-tier clinical test in guidelines for children with autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, intellectual disability, multiple congenital anomalies, and fetuses presenting with structural abnormalities on ultrasonography. Comprehensive prenatal studies demonstrate that CMA increases the detection rate of pathogenic findings by 6-7% in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Postnatally, whereas traditional methods yield a success rate of only 3-5%, CMA elucidates the etiology in 15-20% of children with neurodevelopmental disorders. This method provides rapid results directly from isolated DNA without requiring cell culture; however, it cannot detect balanced chromosomal translocations and point mutations.

Referanslar

Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med; 2020;22(2):245-57. doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8.

Faucett WA, Savage M. Chromosomal microarray testing. JAAPA; 2012;25(1):65-6. doi:10.1097/01720610-201201000-00016.

Levy B, Wapner R. Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis. Fertil Steril; 2018;109(2):201-12. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.005.

Marcinkowska-Swojak M, Uszczynska B, Figlerowicz M, et al. An MLPA-based strategy for discrete CNV genotyping: CNV-miRNAs as an example. Human mutation; 2013;34(5):763-73. doi:10.1002/humu.22288.

McCarroll SA, Altshuler DM. Copy-number variation and association studies of human disease. Nature genetics; 2007;39(7 Suppl):S37-42. doi:10.1038/ng2080.

Kharbanda M, Tolmie J, Joss S. How to use... microarray comparative genomic hybridisation to investigate developmental disorders. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed; 2015;100(1):24-9. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-306022.

Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med; 2012;367(23):2175-84. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1203382.

Srebniak MI, Diderich KE, Joosten M, et al. Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs. Eur J Hum Genet; 2016;24(5):645-51. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.193.

Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, et al. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies. Prenat Diagn; 2012;32(10):976-85. doi:10.1002/pd.3945.

Callaway JL, Shaffer LG, Chitty LS, et al. The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn; 2013;33(12):1119-23. doi:10.1002/pd.4209.

Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013;41(6):610-20. doi:10.1002/uog.12464.

Committee on G, the Society for Maternal-Fetal M. Committee Opinion No.682: Microarrays and Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: The Use of Advanced Genetic Diagnostic Tools in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol; 2016;128(6):e262-e8. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001817.

Donnelly JC, Platt LD, Rebarber A, et al. Association of copy number variants with specific ultrasonographically detected fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol; 2014;124(1):83-90. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000336.

Sukenik-Halevy R, Sukenik S, Koifman A, et al. Clinical aspects of prenatally detected congenital heart malformations and the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis. Prenat Diagn; 2016;36(13):1185-91. doi:10.1002/pd.4954.

Ropers HH. Genetics of early onset cognitive impairment. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2010;11:161-87. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141640.

Hochstenbach R, Buizer-Voskamp JE, Vorstman JA, et al. Genome arrays for the detection of copy number variations in idiopathic mental retardation, idiopathic generalized epilepsy and neuropsychiatric disorders: lessons for diagnostic workflow and research. Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011;135(3-4):174-202. doi:10.1159/000332928.

Miles JH. Autism spectrum disorders--a genetics review. Genet Med; 2011;13(4):278-94. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181ff67ba.

Itsara A, Wu H, Smith JD, et al. De novo rates and selection of large copy number variation. Genome Res; 2010;20(11):1469-81. doi:10.1101/gr.107680.110.

Rosenfeld JA, Coe BP, Eichler EE, et al. Estimates of penetrance for recurrent pathogenic copy-number variations. Genet Med; 2013;15(6):478-81. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.164.

Demir Eksi D, Shen Y, Erman M, et al. Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MULLERIAN aplasia. Mol Cytogenet; 2018;11:13. doi:10.1186/s13039-018-0359-3.

Demir Eksi D YE, Akin Y, Usta MF, Basar MM, Kahraman S, Erman M, Alper OM. Copy Number Variation Analysis in Turkish Patients with Congenital Bilateral Absence of Vas Deferens. Acta Medica Alanya; 2021;5(2):181-9.

Cheroki C, Krepischi-Santos AC, Szuhai K, et al. Genomic imbalances associated with mullerian aplasia. J Med Genet; 2008;45(4):228-32. doi:10.1136/jmg.2007.051839.

Coulter ME, Miller DT, Harris DJ, et al. Chromosomal microarray testing influences medical management. Genet Med; 2011;13(9):770-6. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821dd54a.

Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet; 2010;86(5):749-64. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006.

Manning M, Hudgins L, Professional P, et al. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med; 2010;12(11):742-5. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f8baad.

Kaminsky EB, Kaul V, Paschall J, et al. An evidence-based approach to establish the functional and clinical significance of copy number variants in intellectual and developmental disabilities. Genet Med; 2011;13(9):777-84. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31822c79f9.

Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, et al. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med; 2011;13(7):680-5. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182217a3a.

Gelecek

28 Mart 2022

Lisans

Lisans