Kanser Hastalarında Beden Algısı: Kozmetik ve Estetik Sorunlarla Baş Etme
Özet
Kanser, bireylerde bedensel rahatsızlıkların yanı sıra psikososyal ve ruhsal alanlarda da kronik sorunlara yol açan ciddi bir hastalıktır. Kemoterapi, radyoterapi ve cerrahi gibi tedavi yöntemlerinin neden olduğu fiziksel ve kozmetik değişiklikler; hastalarda estetik kaygılara, olumsuz beden algısına ve benlik saygısının düşmesine zemin hazırlamaktadır. Özellikle saç dökülmesi, mastektomi ve jinekolojik operasyonlar gibi durumlar kadınsı kimlik algısını, cinsel işlevleri ve partner ilişkilerini doğrudan olumsuz etkilemektedir. Profilaktik cerrahi kararları kanser endişesini azaltsa da, vücut bütünlüğünün bozulması nedeniyle psikolojik sıkıntılara yol açabilmektedir. Baş, boyun ve mesane kanserlerindeki kalıcı değişiklikler ile inkontinans gibi komplikasyonlar da hastaları sosyal ve duygusal izolasyona sürüklemektedir. Bu nedenle, ruh sağlığı profesyonellerinin tedavi sürecine erken dahil olması ve hastaların kozmetik sorunlarla baş etme stratejilerini desteklemesi, yaşam kalitesini artırmak açısından kritik bir öneme sahiptir.
Cancer is a serious disease that causes chronic psychosocial and emotional problems in individuals alongside physical discomfort. Physical and cosmetic changes caused by treatment methods such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery lead to aesthetic concerns, negative body image, and decreased self-esteem in patients. Particularly, conditions like hair loss, mastectomy, and gynecological operations directly and adversely affect the perception of feminine identity, sexual functions, and partner relationships. Although prophylactic surgery decisions reduce cancer anxiety, they can cause psychological distress due to the disruption of bodily integrity. Permanent changes in head, neck, and bladder cancers, as well as complications like incontinence, also drive patients into social and emotional isolation. Therefore, the early involvement of mental health professionals in the treatment process and their support for patients' coping strategies with cosmetic problems are of critical importance for improving the quality of life.
Referanslar
Kroman N, Jensen MB, Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen HT, Andersen PK, Melbye M. Factors influencing the effect of age on prognosis in breast cancer: Population based study. BMJ. 2000;320:4748.
Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3322-30.
Weber CS, Fliege H, Arck PC, Kreuzer KA, Rose M, Klapp BF. Patients with haematological malignancies show a restricted body focusing on function and emotion. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2005;14:155-65.
Kutanis Özen R. Tunç T. Hemşirelerde benlik saygısı ile durumluk ve sürekli kaygı arasındaki ilişki: bir üniversite hastane- si örneği. “İş, Güç” Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi 2013;15:1-15.
Üstündağ MF, Özcan H, Yazla E, Kıvrak Y, Aydın EF, Yılmaz M. Anxiety and depression symptoms, self-esteem and body image among patients with gynecological cancers: a cross- sectional study. Kafkas J Med Sci 2017;7:214-9.
Kurt E, Özdilli K, Yorulmaz H. Romatoid artritli hastalarda beden imajı ve benlik saygısı. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 2013;50:202-8.
Parvan K, Tabrizi FJ, Rahmani A, Ghojazadeh M, Azadi A, Golchin M. The relationship between hope and self-esteem in patients with leukemia. Journal of Caring Sciences 2015;4:217- 23.
Guerra-Tapia A, Gonzalez-Guerra E. Hair cosmetics: dyes. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2014;105:833-9
Ateş S, Olgun N. Kemoterapiye bağlı alopesi ve yaşam kalitesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi 2014;67- 80.
Seda Pehlivan S, Doğan D, Kahraman BN, Özkalemkaş Ö. Akut Lösemi Hastalarında Alopesinin Beden İmajı ve Benlik Saygısına Etkisi Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2019;45:2:173-178. DOI: 10.32708/uutfd.558864
Geihman G, Zimmermann C, Deckert A, et al. Depression and hopelessness in patients with acute leukemia: the psychological impact of an acute and life-threatening disorder. Psychooncology 2016;25:979-89.
Tuncay T. Kanserle Başetmede Destek Grupları. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet 2010; 21.1: 59-71.
Reis N. Jinekolojik kanser ve tedavisinin kadın cinsel sağlığına etkileri. C. Ü. Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Derg 2003;7:35–40. http://eskidergi.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/makale/629.pdf
Steentjes L, Siesling S, Drummond FJ, van Manen JG, Sharp L, Gavin A. Factors associated with current and severe physical side- effects after prostate cancer treatment: What men report. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018;27:e12589. [CrossRef ]
Abbott-Anderson K, Kwekkeboom KL. A systematic review of sexual concerns reported by gynecological cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(3):477–489.
Persson E, Severinsson E, Hellstrom AL. Spouses’ perceptions of and reactions to living with a partner who has undergone surgery for rectal cancer resulting in a stoma. Cancer Nurs. 2004 Jan–Feb;27(1):85–90.
Urbaniec OA, Collins K, Denson LA, Whitford HS. Gynecological cancer survivors: assessment of psychological distress and unmet supportive care needs. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2011;29(5):534551.
Bifulco G, De Rosa N, Tornesello ML, Piccoli R, Bertrando A, Lavitola G, . . . Nappi C. Quality of life, lifestyle behavior and employment experience: A comparison between young and midlife survivors of gynecology early stage cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(3):444–451.
Sprangers MAG, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, te Velde A. Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:361–9. [CrossRef ]
Carter J, Lacchetti C, Andersen BL, Barton DL, Bolte S, Damast S, et al. Interventions to address sexual problems in people with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline adaptation of Cancer Care Ontario guideline. J Clin Oncol 2017;36:492–511. [CrossRef]
Kocaman Yıldırım N, Kaçmaz N, Özkan M. İleri evre kanser hastalarının karşılanmamış bakım gereksinimleri. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Derg 2013;4:153–8. [CrossRef ]
Geiger AM, Nekhlyudov L, Herrinton LJ, et al. Quality of life after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):686–694.
Bresser PJ, Seynaeve C, Van Gool AR, et al. The course of distress in women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer due to an (identified) genetic susceptibility who opt for prophylactic mastectomy and/or salpingo-oophorectomy. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jan;43(1):95–103.
van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Lodder LN, et al. Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3867–3874.
Madalinska JB, Hollenstein J, Bleiker E, et al. Quality-of-life effects of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy versus gynecologic screening among women at increased risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):6890–6898.
Altschuler A, Nekhlyudov L, Rosnick SJ, et al. Positive, negative and disparate-women’s differing long term psychosocial experiences of bilateral or contralatreral prophylactic mastectomy. Breast Journal. 2008;14:25–32.
Rolnick SJ, Altschuler A, Nekhlyudov, et al. What women wish they knew before prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Nurs. 2007;30:285–291.
Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM, Rodin GM, Gullane PJ. Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support. Head Neck. 2003;25:103112.
Kinahan KE, Sharp LK, Seidel K, Leisenring W, Didwania A, Lacouture ME, et al. Scarring, disfigurement, and quality of life in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(20):2466–2474.
Steentjes L, Siesling S, Drummond FJ, van Manen JG, Sharp L, Gavin A. Factors associated with current and severe physical side-effects after prostate cancer treatment: What men report. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018;27:e12589. [CrossRef ]
Olsson C, Sandin-Bojö AK, Bjuresäter K, Larsson M. Changes in sexuality, body image and health related quality of life in patients treated for hematologic malignancies: A longitudinal study. Sex Disabil 2016;34:367–88. [CrossRef ]
Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 2005;92:1124–32. [CrossRef ]
