Sanal Kolonoskopi
Özet
Sanal kolonoskopi (BT kolonoskopi), kolorektal kanser ve polip taramasında kullanılan, minimal invaziv ve bilgisayarlı tomografi tabanlı bir görüntüleme yöntemidir. Konvansiyonel kolonoskopiye alternatif olarak geliştirilen bu teknik, 1 cm ve üzerindeki poliplerin saptanmasında %93 duyarlılık ve %97 seçicilik gibi yüksek bir başarı oranına sahiptir. Özellikle tam tamamlanamayan kolonoskopilerde, anestezi riskinin olduğu durumlarda veya hasta tercihine bağlı olarak tamamlayıcı veya birincil tarama testi olarak tercih edilmektedir. Yöntemin en büyük avantajları arasında sedasyon gerektirmemesi, perforasyon riskinin düşük olması ve kolon dışı yapıların da değerlendirilebilmesi yer alırken; radyasyon maruziyeti ve işlem sırasında biyopsi yapılamaması temel dezavantajlarıdır. Tetkik öncesinde barsak temizliği ve feçes işaretleme yöntemleri uygulanmakta, çekim sonrası 2 ve 3 boyutlu endolüminal görüntüler iş istasyonlarında uzmanlarca değerlendirilmektedir. Feçes, rektal kateterler ve yetersiz distansiyon gibi yanıltıcı durumlar tanıda zorluk çıkarabilse de gelişen teknoloji ile sanal kolonoskopinin gelecekte kolorektal kanser tanısında daha geniş yer bulması beklenmektedir.
Virtual colonoscopy (CT colonography) is a minimally invasive, computed tomography-based imaging method used for colorectal cancer and polyp screening. Developed as an alternative to conventional colonoscopy, this technique has a high success rate for detecting polyps 1 cm and larger, with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97%. It is preferred as a complementary or primary screening test, particularly in cases of incomplete colonoscopy, when anesthesia risk exists, or based on patient preference. The primary advantages of the method include the lack of sedation requirement, low risk of perforation, and the ability to evaluate extra-colonic structures simultaneously; however, radiation exposure and the inability to perform biopsies during the procedure are its main disadvantages. Before the examination, bowel preparation and fecal tagging methods are applied, and after imaging, 2D and 3D endoluminal images are evaluated by specialists at workstations. Although pitfalls such as feces, rectal catheters, and insufficient distension can pose diagnostic challenges, virtual colonoscopy is expected to play a larger role in colorectal cancer diagnosis in the near future with advancing technology.
Referanslar
Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:250–281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457
Day DW, Morson BC. The adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Major Probl Pathol 1978; 10: 58-71.
Morson BC. The evolution of colorectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1984; 35: 425-431.doi:10.1016/ S0009-9260(84)80033-1.
Toribara NW, Sleisenger MH. Screening for colorectal cancer.N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 861-867.doi:10.1056/NEJM199503303321306.
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Diaz B. The national polyp study: temporal sequence of evolving colorectal cancer from the normal colon. Gastrointest Endosc 1987; 33:167.
Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36:2251-2270.
Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 525-532.doi: 10.1056/NEJM198809013190901.
Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005; 365: 305-311.doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17784-8.
Vining DJ, Gelfland DW, Bechthold RE, et al. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality (abst) AJR 1994; 162(suppl):104.
Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011;259:393–405. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101887
Mang TCP, Lefere P. International implementation. In: Dachman AH, Laghi A, editors. Atlas of Virtual Colonoscopy. New York: Springer, 2010: 9-48.
Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, metaanalysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005;237:893-904.doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373050176.
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570-1595.doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002.
McFarland EG, Fletcher JG, Pickhardt P, et al. Colon Cancer Committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009. J Am Coll Radiol 2009; 6: 756-772.e4.
McFarland EG, Levin B, Lieberman DA, et al. Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology. Radiology 2008;248:717-20.doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483080842.
Neerincx M, Terhaar sive Droste JS, Mulder CJ, et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 730-735. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255523.
Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, et al. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 561-564.
Finan PJ, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. Synchronous and early metachronous carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Br J Surg.1987;74:945-7.
Iafrate F, Hassan C, Zullo A, et al. CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation alter incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1385-95. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0892-2.
Hanly P, Skally M, Fenlon H, et al. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28: 415-423. doi: 10.1017/ S0266462312000542.
Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2006; 239: 313-316. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392052002.
Boone D, Halligan S, Taylor SA. Evidence review and status update on computed tomography colonography. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011; 13: 486-494.doi: 10.1007/ s11894-011-0217-5.
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim KP, Yee J. CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010;20(2):279–291.doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.003.
Cha EY, Park SH, Lee SS, et al. CT colonography after metallic stent placement for acute malignant colonic obstruction. Radiology 2010; 254: 774-782. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090842.
Coccetta M, Migliaccio C, La Mura F, et al. Virtual colonoscopy in stenosing colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Innov Res 2009; 3: 11.DOI: 10.1186/1750-1164-3-11.
Ota Y, Matsui T, Ono H, et al. Value of virtual computed tomographic colonography for Crohn’s colitis: comparison with endoscopy and barium enema. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28: 778-783.doi: 10.1007/s00261-003-0023-0.
Macari M, Lavell M, Pedrosa I. Effect of different preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 2001; 218:274-277. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01ja31274.
Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, et al. Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125:304-310. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00885-0.
Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ. Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges: update 2002. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:502-524. doi: 10.1007/s003300101116.
McFarland EG. Reader strategies for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:275-283. doi: 10.1007/s00261-001-0169-6.
Geenen RW, Hussain SM, Cademartiri F, et al. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection. Radiographics. 2004 ;24:e18. doi: 10.1148/rg.e18
Morrin MM, Farrel RJ, Kruskal JB, et al. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 2000;217:765-771.doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00nv42765
Tomandl BF, Hastreiter P, Rezk-Salama C, et al. Local and remote visualization techniques for interactive direct volume rendering in neuroradiology. RadioGraphics 2001; 21:1561-1572. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.6.g01nv241561.
Vos F, Serlie I, Van Gelder R, et al. A review of technical advances in virtual colonoscopy. Medinfo 2001; 10:938-942.
Ricci ZJ, Mazzariol FS, Kobi M, et al. CT Colonography: Improving Interpretive Skill by Avoiding Pitfalls. Radiographics. 2020;40:98-119. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020190078. Epub 2019 Dec 6. Erratum in: Radiographics. 2020;40:608.
Bortz J. Potential pitfalls in the anorectal region during CT colonography: a discussion and pictorial overview of common pitfalls. S Afr J Radiol 2017;21:a1108.
Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, et al. Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. RadioGraphics 2007;27:431–454. doi.org/10.1148/rg.272065081.
