İntestinal Adezyonlar
Özet
İntestinal adezyonlar, karın içi organlar veya periton arasında oluşan fibröz bantlardır ve en sık geçirilmiş operasyonlar nedeniyle gelişirler. Bu durum ince barsak obstrüksiyonlarının %85'inden sorumlu olup kadın infertilitesi ve kronik ağrı gibi ciddi morbiditelere yol açar. Fizyolojik süreçte peritondaki hasar sonrası oluşan fibrin jel matriksinin, yetersiz fibrinoliz nedeniyle kalıcı hale gelmesiyle adezyonlar şekillenir. Tanı koymak, semptomların özgül olmaması ve kesin bir görüntüleme testinin bulunmaması nedeniyle zordur; ancak BT, strangulasyon tespiti ve cerrahi gerekliliğini belirlemede en değerli yöntemdir. Önleme aşamasında titiz cerrahi teknik, laparoskopik yaklaşımlar ve bariyer ürünlerin (Seprafilm, İnterceed vb.) kullanımı kritik öneme sahiptir. Tedavide ise peritonit veya iskemi bulgusu yoksa ilk seçenek %70 başarı oranıyla nazogastrik dekompresyon ve sıvı desteğini içeren konservatif izlemdir; 72 saatte iyileşme sağlanamazsa cerrahi müdahale gereklidir. Minimal invaziv cerrahinin yaygınlaşması adezyon riskini azaltsa da bu karmaşık problemin tamamen çözümü için daha fazla prospektif çalışmaya ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.
Intestinal adhesions are fibrous bands forming between intra-abdominal organs or the peritoneum, most commonly developing due to previous surgeries. This condition accounts for 85% of small bowel obstructions and causes significant morbidity, including female infertility and chronic pain. In the physiological process, the fibrin gel matrix formed after peritoneal damage becomes permanent due to insufficient fibrinolysis, leading to adhesions. Diagnosis is challenging due to non-specific symptoms and the lack of a definitive imaging test; however, CT is the most valuable method for detecting strangulation and predicting the need for surgery. In the prevention phase, meticulous surgical technique, laparoscopic approaches, and the use of barrier products (such as Seprafilm or Interceed) are of critical importance. Regarding treatment, if there are no signs of peritonitis or ischemia, the first-line option is conservative management, including nasogastric decompression and fluid support, which has a 70% success rate; surgical intervention is required if improvement is not achieved within 72 hours. Although the widespread use of minimally invasive surgery reduces the risk, more prospective studies are needed to fully resolve this complex clinical problem.
Referanslar
Tabibian N, Swehli E, Boyd A, et al. Abdominal adhesions: A practical review of an often overlooked entity. [Online] Annals of Medicine and Surgery. Elsevier Ltd; 2017. p. 9–13. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.021
Hassanabad AF, Zarzycki AN, Jeon K, et al. Post-operative adhesions: A comprehensive review of mechanisms. Biomedicines. MDPI AG; 2021;9(8). doi:10.3390/biomedicines9080867
Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, et al. Peritoneal Adhesions : Etiology , Pathophysiology , and. Digestive Surgery. 2001;14233: 260–273.
Diamond MP, Freeman ML. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Human Reproduction Update. 2001;7(6): 567–576. doi:10.1093/humupd/7.6.567
Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions - How big is the problem? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1990;72(1): 60–63.
Ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C, et al. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;383(9911): 48–59. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61687-6
Connor DBO, Winter DC. The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction : a review of over 2 , 000 cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26: 12–17. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1885-9
A. Hirschelmann, Wallwiener CW, Wallwiener M, et al. Is Patient Education About Adhesions a Requirement in Abdominopelvic Surgery ? Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2012;72: 299–304.
Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ, et al. Obtaining informed consent: patient awareness of adhesions. adhesion news and vievws. 2003;(4): 10–12.
Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ, et al. Postoperative Adhesions: Ten-Year Follow-Up of 12,584 Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(6): 822–829.
Fortin CN, Saed GM, Diamond MP. Predisposing factors to post-operative adhesion development. Human Reproduction Update. 2014;21(4): 536–551. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv021
Mutsaers SE, Wilkosz S. Structure and function of mesothelial cells. Cancer treatment and research. 2007;134: 1–19.
Diamond MP, El-Hammady E, Wang R, et al. Regulation of expression of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 by dichloroacetic acid in human fibroblasts from normal peritoneum and adhesions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;190(4): 926–933. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.009
Lorenz EPM, Zuhlke H V, Lange R, et al. 1 . 4 Pathophysiology and Classification of Adhesions. 1997;
Maglinte DD, Reyes BL, Harmon BH, et al. Reliability and role of plain film radiography and CT in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1996;167: 1451-1455. 1996;167(1451): 1455.
Daneshmand S, CG H, SC. S. The utility and reliability of computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Am Surg. 1999;65(10):922–6. 99AD;65(10): 922–926.
Ceresoli M, Coccolini F, Catena F, et al. Water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic value. American Journal of Surgery. Elsevier Inc; 2016;211(6): 1114–1125. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.06.012
Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnüriger B, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction. British Journal of Surgery. 2010;97(4): 470–478. doi:10.1002/bjs.7019
Sarr MG, Bannon MP. Prospective, observational validation of a multivariate small-bowel obstruction model to predict the need for operative intervention. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011;212(6): 1068–1076. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.023
Baghdadi YMK, Morris DS, Choudhry AJ, et al. Validation of the anatomic severity score developed by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma in small bowel obstruction. Journal of Surgical Research. Elsevier Inc; 2016;204(2): 428–434. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.076
Hefny AF, Corr P, Abu-Zidan FM. The role of ultrasound in the management of intestinal obstruction. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock. 2012;5(1): 84–86. doi:10.4103/0974-2700.93109
Luijendijk RW, De Lange DCD, Wauters CCAP, et al. Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Annals of Surgery. 1996;223(3): 242–248. doi:10.1097/00000658-199603000-00003
Ten Broek RPG, Wilbers J, Van Goor H. Electrocautery causes more ischemic peritoneal tissue damage than ultrasonic dissection. Surgical Endoscopy. 2011;25(6): 1827–1834. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1474-3
Burns EM, Currie A, Bottle A, et al. Minimal-access colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related admissions than open surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 2013;100(1): 152–159. doi:10.1002/bjs.8964
Krielen P, Stommel MWJ, Pargmae P, et al. Adhesion-related readmissions after open and laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study (SCAR update). www.thelancet.com. 2020.
Davey AK, Maher PJ. Surgical adhesions: A timely update, a great challenge for the future. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2007;14(1): 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.07.013
Zeng Q, Yu Z, You J, et al. Efficacy and safety of seprafilm for preventing postoperative abdominal adhesion: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Surgery. 2007;31(11): 2125–2131. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9242-9
Ergul E, Korukluoglu B. Peritoneal adhesions: Facing the enemy. International Journal of Surgery. 2008;6(3): 253–260. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.05.010
Brown CB, Luciano AA, Martin D, et al. Adept (icodextrin 4% solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertility and Sterility. 2007;88(5): 1413–1426. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.084
Fevang BT, Jensen D, Svanes K, et al. Early operation or conservative management of patients with small bowel obstruction? European Journal of Surgery. 2002;168(8–9): 475–481. doi:10.1080/110241502321116488
Jeppesen M, Tolstrup MB, Gögenur I. Chronic Pain, Quality of Life, and Functional Impairment After Surgery Due to Small Bowel Obstruction. World Journal of Surgery. 2016;40(9): 2091–2097. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3616-9
Ten Broek RPG, Strik C, Issa Y, et al. Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2013;258(1): 98–106. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969
ten Broek RPG, Krielen P, Di Saverio S, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2018;13(1). doi:10.1186/s13017-018-0185-2
Keenan JE, Turley RS, McCoy CC, et al. Trials of nonoperative management exceeding 3 days are associated with increased morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for uncomplicated adhesive small bowel obstruction. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2014;76(6): 1367–1372. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000246
Sajid MS, Khawaja AH, Sains P, et al. A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction. [Online] American Journal of Surgery. Elsevier Ltd; 2016. 138–150 p. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.030
Farinella E, Cirocchi R, La Mura F, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2009;4(1): 1–9. doi:10.1186/1749-7922-4-3