Pankreas Boyun ve Kuyruk Tümörlerinde Cerrahi Tedavi
Özet
Bu yazı, pankreas gövde ve kuyruk tümörlerinde uygulanan cerrahi yöntemleri, özellikle distal pankreatektomi prosedürlerini kapsamlı bir şekilde ele almaktadır. Pankreasın anatomik yapısı ve damarsal beslenmesiyle başlayan metin, distal pankreas tümörlerinin genellikle geç evrede teşhis edildiğini ve düşük rezektabilite oranlarına sahip olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Cerrahi teknikler arasında klasik distal pankreatektominin yanı sıra, çölyak aks tutulumu olan vakalarda uygulanan "Modifiye Appleby Operasyonu" (DP-CAR) detaylandırılmıştır. Bu yöntemin R0 rezeksiyon şansını artırdığı ve yaşam kalitesini iyileştirdiği belirtilmektedir. Ayrıca, dalak koruyucu yaklaşımlar olan Warshaw ve Kimura prosedürleri karşılaştırılmış; Kimura yönteminin teknik zorluğuna rağmen dalak fonksiyonlarını korumadaki avantajlarına değinilmiştir. Güncel teknolojik gelişmeler ışığında laparoskopik ve robotik cerrahinin açık cerrahiye göre daha az komplikasyon ve daha hızlı iyileşme gibi faydalar sağladığı, ancak ileri evre vakalarda açık cerrahinin halen standart olduğu ifade edilmiştir. Son olarak, ameliyat sonrası beslenme, antibiyotik ve enzim tedavisi gibi klinik yönetim stratejileri ile cerrahi endikasyonlar özetlenmiştir.
This article comprehensively covers surgical methods for pancreatic body and tail tumors, specifically focusing on distal pancreatectomy procedures. Starting with the anatomical structure and vascular supply of the pancreas, the text emphasizes that distal pancreatic tumors are often diagnosed at late stages and have low resectability rates. Among surgical techniques, besides classical distal pancreatectomy, the "Modified Appleby Operation" (DP-CAR), applied in cases with celiac axis involvement, is detailed. It is stated that this method increases the chance of R0 resection and improves quality of life. Furthermore, spleen-preserving approaches such as the Warshaw and Kimura procedures are compared, highlighting the advantages of the Kimura method in preserving splenic functions despite its technical difficulty. In light of current technological developments, it is noted that laparoscopic and robotic surgeries provide benefits like fewer complications and faster recovery compared to open surgery; however, open surgery remains the standard for advanced cases. Finally, clinical management strategies such as postoperative nutrition, antibiotic, and enzymatic therapy, along with surgical indications, are summarized.
Referanslar
Yamamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Ban D, et al. Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer? Surgery. 2012;151:61–99.
Appleby LH. The coeliac axis in the expansion of the operation for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1953;6(4):704–7.
Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Tomikawa M, et al. Stomachpreserving distal pancreatectomy with combined resection of the celiac artery: radical procedure for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(6):743–9
Hirano S, Kondo S, Hara T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2007;246(1):46–51.
Greer J, Zureikat AH. Robotic distal pancreatectomy combined with celiac axis resection. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:145.
Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017;15(8):1028–61.
Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, Laheru DA, et al. Recent progress in pancreatic cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(5):318–48.
Nakamura T, Hirano S, Noji T, et al. Distal Pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac Axis resection (modified Appleby procedure) for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: a single center review of 80 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:969–75.
Van Hilst J, Strating EA, de Rooij T, Daams F, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Klaase JM, Luyer M, Dijkgraaf MG, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer G and Collaborators Lt. Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial). Br J Surg. 2019;106(7):910–21.
Van Hilst J, Korrel M, de Rooij T, Lof S, Busch OR, Groot Koerkamp B, Kooby DA, van Dieren S, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG, Group Ds. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(5):719–27
Yang DJ, Xiong JJ, Lu HM, Wei Y, Zhang L, Lu S, Hu WM. The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1159
Gianpaolo B, Alessandro Z, Valerio DC. Spleenpreserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of splenic artery and vein: a cautionary note. World J Surg. 2007;31(7):1530. author reply 1531.
Govil S, Imrie CW. Value of splenic preservation during distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 1999;86(7):895.
Hutchins RR, et al. Long-term results of distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis in 90 patients. Ann Surg. 2002;236(5):612–8.
Jain G, Chakravartty S, Patel AG. Spleenpreserving distal pancreatectomy with and without splenic vessel ligation: a systematic review. HPB. 2013;15(6):403–10.
Partelli S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with preservation or ligation of the splenic artery and vein. The Surgeon. 2015;14(2):109–18.)
Warshaw AL. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 1988;123(5): 550–3.
Kimura W, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;120(10):885.
Soreide K, Olsen F, Nymo LS, et al. A nationwide cohort study of resection rates and short-term outcomes in open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(6):669–78.
Soreide K, Nymo LS, Kleive D, et al. Variation in use of open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and associated outcome metrics in a universal health care system. Pancreatology. 2019;19:880–7.
Zhao W, Liu C, Li S, Geng D, Feng Y, Sun M. Safety and effcacy for robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Oncol. 2018;27(3):468–78.
Parisi A, Coratti F, Cirocchi R, Grassi V, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy with or without preservation of spleen: a technical note. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:295.
Elabbasy F, et al. Minimally invasive spleenpreserving distal pancreatectomy: does splenic vessel preservation have better postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2015;14(4):346–53.
Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:408–10.
