Afazide Sendrom Yaklaşımı ve Kognitif Yaklaşımlar
Özet
Nöro-görüntüleme alanındaki son teknolojik gelişmeler, dilin işlevsel nöro-anatomisinin daha iyi anlaşılmasını sağlayarak afazi terapisinde kortikal beyin uyarımı gibi yenilikçi yöntemlerin önünü açmıştır. Günümüzde afazi yalnızca bir dil bozukluğu olarak değil, aynı zamanda dikkat, bellek ve yürütücü işlevler gibi alanları da etkileyen karmaşık bir bilişsel süreç bozulması olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu doğrultuda afazi hastalarının değerlendirilmesi ve rehabilitasyon süreçlerinde sadece dil testlerine bağlı kalmak yetersiz görülmekte, hastaların standart nöro-psikolojik ve sözel olmayan yeteneklerinin de sürece dahil edilmesi tedavi başarısını doğrudan etkilemektedir. Tarihsel süreçte afazi araştırmalarında kognitif yaklaşımların yanı sıra, semptomların düzenli birlikteliğini inceleyen sendromik yaklaşım da kritik bir rol oynamıştır. Bu kapsamda geliştirilen klasik modeller, Broca alanı (motor merkez) ve Wernicke alanı (işitsel merkez) gibi kortikal bölgelerin yanı sıra alt parietal lob gibi yapıların dildeki adlandırma ve anlama süreçlerindeki rollerini tanımlamıştır. Sonuç olarak, afazinin doğru teşhisi ve maksimum terapötik fayda sağlanması için dil ve konuşma terapisinin, bilişsel teoriler ve çok disiplinli nöro-psikolojik değerlendirmelerle desteklenmesi esastır.
Recent technological advances in neuroimaging have provided a better understanding of the functional neuroanatomy of language, paving the way for innovative methods such as cortical brain stimulation in aphasia therapy. Today, aphasia is accepted not merely as a language impairment but as a complex cognitive disruption affecting areas such as attention, memory, and executive functions. Accordingly, relying solely on language assessments in the evaluation and rehabilitation of patients with aphasia is deemed insufficient; incorporating their standard neuropsychological and non-verbal abilities directly influences treatment success. Historically, alongside cognitive approaches, the syndromic approach examining the regular co-occurrence of symptoms has played a critical role in aphasia research. Classic models developed within this scope have defined the roles of cortical regions such as Broca's area (motor center) and Wernicke's area (auditory center), as well as structures like the inferior parietal lobule, in naming and comprehension processes. Consequently, for accurate diagnosis and maximum therapeutic benefit in aphasia, it is essential to support speech and language therapy with cognitive theories and multidisciplinary neuropsychological evaluations.
Referanslar
Au, R., Albert, M. L., & Obler, L. K. (1988). The relation of aphasia to dementia. Aphasiology, 2(2), 161-173.
Bayles, K. A. (2001). Understanding the neuropsychological syndrome of dementia. Seminars in Speech and Language,
Beeson, P. M., Bayles, K. A., Rubens, A. B., & Kaszniak, A. W. (1993). Memory impairment and executive control in individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. Brain and language, 45(2), 253-275.
Broca, P. (1861). Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d’une observation d’aphémie (perte de la parole). Bulletin et Memoires de la Societe anatomique de Paris, 6, 330-357.
Brown, J. W. (2013). The life of the mind. Psychology Press.
Caplan, D. (1987). Neurolinguistics and linguistic aphasiology: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and language, 3(4), 572-582.
Code, C. (1987). Language, aphasia and the right hemisphere.
Code, C. (1989). The characteristics of aphasia. CRC Press.
Code, C., & Ball, M. J. (1988). Apraxia of speech: the case for a cognitive phonetics. Theoretical Linguistics and Disordered Language. London: Croom Helm, 152-167.
Coltheart, M. (2001). Assumptions and methods in cognitive neuropsychology. The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind, 3-21.
Damasio, A. (1981). The nature of aphasia: Signs and syndromes. Acquired aphasia, 51-65.
El Hachioui, H., Visch-Brink, E. G., Lingsma, H. F., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M. W., Dippel, D. W., Koudstaal, P. J., & Middelkoop, H. A. (2014). Nonlinguistic cognitive impairment in poststroke aphasia: a prospective study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28(3), 273-281.
Fillingham, J. K., Hodgson, C., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2003). The application of errorless learning to aphasic disorders: A review of theory and practice. Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 13(3), 337-363.
Fonseca, J., Ferreira, J. J., & Martins, I. P. (2017). Cognitive performance in aphasia due to stroke: a systematic review. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 16(2), 127-139.
Fridriksson, J., Fillmore, P., Guo, D., & Rorden, C. (2015). Chronic Broca's aphasia is caused by damage to Broca's and Wernicke's areas. Cerebral Cortex, 25(12), 4689-4696.
Fund, C., & Baker, B. R. Rosenbek, J., LaPointe, L, & Wertz, R.(1989) Aphasia: a clinical approach, Austin, Texas: Pro. ed. Schuell, H., Jenkins, J., & Jimenez-Pabon, E.(1964). Aphasia in adults: Diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. New York: Hoeber Medical Division, Harper & Row Publishers. Steele, R., M. Weinrich, M. Kleczewska, G. Carlson, and R Wertz (1987). Evaluating perfor.
Geschwind, N. (1965). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Brain, 88(3), 585-585.
Gonçalves, A. P. B., Mello, C., Pereira, A. H., Ferré, P., Fonseca, R. P., & Joanette, Y. (2018). Executive functions assessment in patients with language impairment a systematic review. Dementia & neuropsychologia, 12, 272-283.
Goodglass, H. (1976). Agrammatism. Studies in neurolinguistics, 1, 237-260.
Heeschen, C., & Kolk, H. (1988). Agrammatism and paragrammatism. Aphasiology, 2(3-4), 299-302.
Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2002). Cognition and aphasia: a discussion and a study. Journal of communication disorders, 35(2), 171-186.
Helm-Estabrooks, N., & Albert, M. L. (1991). Manual of aphasia therapy. Austin, Tex.: PRO-ED.
Jackson, J. H. (1958). In J. Taylor (Ed.): Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson. London: Staples.
Jacquemot, C., Dupoux, E., Decouche, O., & Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C. (2006). Misperception in sentences but not in words: Speech perception and the phonological buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(6), 949-971.
Kauhanen, M.-L., Korpelainen, J. T., Hiltunen, P., Määttä, R., Mononen, H., Brusin, E., Sotaniemi, K. A., & Myllylä, V. (2000). Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 10(6), 455-461.
Lecours, A., Nespoulous, J., & Pioger, D. (1987). Jacques Lordat or the birth of cognitive neuropsychology. Motor and sensory processes of language, 1-16.
Lichtheim, L. (1885). On aphasia. Brain, 7, 433-484.
Luria, A. (1970). Traumatic aphasia. Mouton. The Hague.
Luria, A. R. (2012). Higher cortical functions in man. Springer Science & Business Media.
Marinelli, C. V., Spaccavento, S., Craca, A., Marangolo, P., & Angelelli, P. (2017). Different cognitive profiles of patients with severe aphasia. Behavioural neurology, 2017.
Markashova, E., Skvortsov, A., Baulina, M., Kovyazina, M., & Varako, N. (2021). Meeting in the middle: Luria’s approach and cognitive approach to spoken language impairment in aphasia. Papeles del Psicologo, 42(2), 1-6.
Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1966). Syntactic and semantic errors in paralexia. Neuropsychologia, 4(2), 169-176.
Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2(3), 175-199.
McNeil, M. R. (1981). Auditory comprehension in aphasia: a language deficit or reduced efficiency of processes supporting language? Clinical aphasiology: Proceedings of the conference 1981,
McNeil, M. R., & Kimelman, M. D. (1986). Toward an integrative information-processing structure of auditory comprehension and processing in adult aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language,
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology appleton-century-crofts. New York, 351.
Peach, R. K. (2017). Cognitive approaches to aphasia treatment: application of the cognition of language to aphasia intervention. Seminars in speech and language,
Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage, 62(2), 816-847.
Price, C. J., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Graham, K. S., Biggio, N., Mechelli, A., Patterson, K., & Noppeney, U. (2003). Normal and pathological reading: converging data from lesion and imaging studies. Neuroimage, 20, S30-S41.
Robinson, R. G., & Benson, D. F. (1981). Depression in aphasic patients: frequency, severity, and clinical-pathological correlations. Brain and Language, 14(2), 282-291.
Rubens, A. (1983). The localization of lesions in transcortical aphasia. Localization in neuropsychology.
Schumacher, R., Halai, A. D., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2019). Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia. Brain, 142(10), 3202-3216.
Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, H. E., Almaghyuli, A., Noonan, K. A., Barak, O., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Jefferies, E. (2018). The contribution of executive control to semantic cognition: Convergent evidence from semantic aphasia and executive dysfunction. Journal of neuropsychology, 12(2), 312-340.
Vallila-Rohter, S., & Kiran, S. (2013). Non-linguistic learning and aphasia: Evidence from a paired associate and feedback-based task. Neuropsychologia, 51(1), 79-90.
Wernicke, C. (1970). The aphasic symptom-complex: a psychological study on an anatomical basis. Archives of Neurology, 22(3), 280-282.
