Afazide Davranışsal Değerlendirme
Özet
İnme geçiren bireylerin neredeyse yarısını etkileyen afazi, beyin hasarı olan hastalarda yaygın olarak görülen kalıcı bir dil bozukluğudur. Afaziden etkilenen bireylerde dil kazanımını en üst düzeye çıkarmak amacıyla, klinik stabilizasyonun ardından olabildiğince erken dönemde doğru, eksiksiz ve etkin bir davranışsal değerlendirme ile müdahale sürecine başlanması elzemdir. Literatürde afazi değerlendirmesi; kısa bir inceleme sunan tarama testleri ve detaylı analiz imkanı veren kapsamlı değerlendirmeler olmak üzere iki ana bağlamda ele alınmaktadır. Kapsamlı değerlendirme süreci; hastanın detaylı anamnezini, kendi kendini değerlendirmesini, oral motor becerilerini, dil ve konuşma testlerini, nöropsikolojik durumunu, kişisel ve çevresel faktörlerini içeren çok katmanlı bir yapıya sahiptir. Bu süreçte uzmanlar, klinik amaca göre formal ve informal değerlendirme araçlarından birlikte faydalanmalıdır. İnformal değerlendirmeler hastanın kültürel geçmişine ve ilgi alanlarına göre uyarlanabilir yapısıyla terapötik değer taşırken, standartlaştırılmış formal testler tanı, sınıflandırma ve objektif veri toplama açısından normatif veriler sağlar. Sonuç olarak dil ve konuşma terapistinin doğru tutumu, multidisipliner çalışmaya inanması ve birey odaklı yaklaşımı tedavinin başarısını belirleyen temel unsurlardır.
Aphasia, which affects nearly half of stroke survivors, is a common and persistent language disorder observed in patients with brain damage. In order to maximize language recovery in individuals affected by aphasia, it is essential to initiate an accurate, complete, and effective behavioral assessment and intervention process as early as possible following clinical stabilization. In the literature, aphasia assessment is addressed within two main contexts: screening tests that offer a brief evaluation, and comprehensive assessments that allow for detailed analysis. The comprehensive assessment process has a multi-layered structure involving the patient's detailed case history, self-assessment, oral motor skills, speech and language tests, neuropsychological status, as well as personal and environmental factors. During this process, specialists must utilize both formal and informal assessment tools based on the clinical objective. While informal assessments carry therapeutic value due to their adaptable nature tailored to the patient's cultural background and interests, standardized formal tests provide normative data for diagnosis, classification, and objective data collection. Consequently, the correct attitude of the speech and language therapist, their belief in multidisciplinary teamwork, and a person-centered approach are the fundamental elements that determine the success of the treatment.
Referanslar
Amita -Cahana, D., Albert, M.L. (2015). Redefining Recovery from Aphasia. Redefining Recovery from Aphasia (ss: 255-263). Birinci Basım. Oxford Press: New York.
Angeleri, F., Angeleri, V. A., Foschi, N., Giaquinto, S., Nolfe, G. (1993). The influence of depression, social activity, and family stress on functional outcome after stroke. Stroke, 24, 1478-1483.
Armstrong, E., Bryant, L., Ferguson, A., Simmons- Mackie, N., (2016). Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. In I. Papathanasiou and P. Coppens (ed), Approaches to assessment and treatment of everyday talk in aphasia (ss: . 269–285), Birinci Baskı. Jones & Bartlett Learning: Burlington, MA.
ASHA(nd) Aphasia Overview. 1-16. Erişim: Eylül 20, 2020 Adres: https://www.asha.org/PRPPr_ntTemplate.aspx?folder_d=8589934663
Atamaz, F., Yağız On, A., Durmaz, B. (2007). Ege Aphasia Test: Description of the test and performance in normal subjects. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 53:5-10.
Bruce, C., Edmonson, A. (2010). Letting the CAT out of the bag: a review of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Commentary on Howard, Swinburn, and Porter, ‘Putting the CAT out: What the Comprehensive Aphasia Test has to offer us’. Aphasiology, 24, 79–93.
Can, H., İrkeç, C., Karakaş, S.(2009). Severity of dementia depends on the rating scale: comparison of mini mental state examination and eisberg Global Deterioration Scale, Klinik Psikiyatri, 12(1): 5-20.
Can, H., Karakaş, S.(2005). Alzheimer tipi demans ve birinci basamakta nöropsikolojik değerlendirme. Sted Dergisi, 14 (2) : 22.
Chapey, R. (2004). Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 37-119.
Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., Turkstra, L., (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4), 223– 241.
Dickey, L., Kagan, A., Lindsay, M. P., Fang, J., Rowland, A., Black, S. (2010). Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 196–202.
Dokur, U. (2013). Başkent Afazi Testinin (BAT) Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliliği Pilot Çalışması, Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara, 2013.
Ekinci Soylu, A., Cangöz, B. (2018). Adaptation and Norm Determination Study of the Boston Naming Test for Healthy Turkish Elderly. Arch Neuropsychiatry, 55:341−348.
Enderby, P. M., Wood, V. A., Wade, D. T., Hewer, R. L. (1986). The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. International rehabilitation medicine, 8(4), 166-170.
Engelter, S.T., Gostynski, M., Papa, S., Frei, M., Born, C., Ajdac Gross, Lyrer, P. A. (2006). Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: Incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke, 37, 1379–1384.
Fastenau, P.S., Denburg, N.L., Mauer, B.A.(1998). Parallel short forms for the Boston Naming Test: psychometric properties and norms for older adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 20:828–834.
Foster, A., Worrall, L., Rose, M., O’Halloran, R. (2016) ‘I do the best I can’: an in-depth exploration of the aphasia management pathway in the acute hospital setting. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38, 1765–1779.
Frattali, C. (1992). Functional assessment of communication: merging public policy with clinical views. Aphasiology, 6(1), 63– 83.
Fries, B. E., Mehr, D. R., Schneider, D., Foley, W. J., Burke, R. (1993). Mental dysfunction and resource use in nursing homes. Medical Care, 31, 898-920.
Gialanella, B., Prometti, P. (2009). Rehabilitation length of stay in patients suffering from aphasia after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil, 16(6):437–444.
Hachioui, H.E., Visch-Brink, E.G., Lonneke, M. L. ve diğ. (2017). Screening tests for aphasia in patients with stroke: a systematic Review. J Neurol, 264:211–220.
Hallowell, B. (2017). Best Practices in Assessment. Aphasia and Other Acquired Neurogenic Language Disorders: A Guide for Clinical Excellence (ss: 259-261). Birinci Basım. Plural Publishing: San Diego.
Heron, M. (2019). Deaths: leading causes for 2017. Natioanl Vital Statistiscs Reports, 68:6. 1-77.
Hersh, D., Wood, P., Armstrong, E., (2017). Informal aphasia assessment, interaction and the development of the therapeutic relationship in the early period after stroke. Aphasiology. 32(8):1-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1381878
Hersh, D., Worrall, L., Howe, T., Sheratt, S., Davidson, B. (2012). Smarter goal setting in aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology, 26, 220–233.
Howard, D., Swinburn, K., Porter, G. (2010). Putting the CAT out: What the comprehensive aphasia test has to offer. Aphasiology, 24 (1), 56–74
Jefferson, A. L., Wong, S., Gracer, T. S., Ozonoff, A., Green, R. C. ve Stern, R. A. (2007). Geriatric performance on an abbreviated version of the Boston Naming Test. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(3), 215-223.
Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology 12:816–830.
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Karakaş, S. (1996). Nöropsikoloji bilimi: Tanımı, faaliyet alanları, ülkemizdeki durumu. Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 2: 21-26.
Karakaş S, Bekçi B. (2003). Zihin/davranış ile beden/organizma ilişkilerini ele alan bilim dallarının doğuşu ve gelişimi. NeuroQuantology, 2: 232-265.
Kwa, V., Limburg, M., Haan, R. (1996). The role of cognitive impairment in the quality of live after ischaemic stroke. J Neurol, 243:599–604.
Lichtenbert, P. A., Gibbons, T. A. (1993). Geriatric rehabilitation and the older adult family caregiver: Stages of carcgiving. Neurmehabilitation, 2, 62-71.
Maviş, İ., Colay, K., Topbaş, S. ve Tanrıdağ, O. (2007). Gülhane Afazi Testi-2 (GAT-2)’nin standardizasyon ve geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi, 13(2), 89-98.
Miller, N., Willmes, K., Bleser, R. (2000). The psychometric properties of the English language version of the Aachen Aphasia Test (EAAT). Aphasiology, 14: 7, 683-722.
Murray, L., Coppens, P. (2013). Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. İçinde: Papathanasiou I, Coppens P Patagus C (Ed). Formal and informal assessment of aphasia (ss: 67-87). Jones& Bartlett Learning, Burlington.
Nouwens, F., Visch-Brink E.G., Van de Sandt-Koenderman M.M., Dippel D.W., Koudstaal P.J., Lau L.M. (2015). Optimal timing of speech and language therapy for aphasia after stroke: more evidence needed. Expert Rev Neurother, 15:885–893.
Robinson, R. G., Bolla-Wilson, K., Kaplan, E., I'ipsey, J. R., Price, T. R. (1986). Depression influences intellectual impairment in stroke patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148,541-547.
Robinson, R. G., Starr, L. B., Kubos, K. L., Price, T. R. (1983). A two-year longitudinal study of poststroke mood disorders: Findings during the initial evaluation. Stroke, 14, 736-741.
Shewan, C.M., Kertesz, A. (1980). Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45(3), 308-324.
Sinanovic, O. (2010). Neuropsychology of acute stroke. Psychiatr Danub.;22(2):278-81.
Spreen, O., Risser, A. (2003). Assessment of Aphasia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115. 242-244.
Stern, R. A. (1996). Asessment of mood states in neurodegenerative disease: Methodological issues and diagnostic recommendations. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry,1, 315-324.
Stern, R.A. (1999). Assessment of mood states in aphasia. Seminars In Speech And Language, 20:1. 33-50.
Thomson, J., Gee, M., Sage, K., Walkers, T. (2018). What ‘form’ does informal assessment take? A scoping review of the informal assessment literature for aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord, 1–16. Doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12382
Toğram, B., Maviş, İ. (2012). Validity, reliability and standardization study of the language assessment test for aphasia. Turk J Neurol., 18(3): 96-103.
Türkyılmaz, M. D., & Belgin, E. (2012). Reliability, validity, and adaptation of Computerized Revised Token Test in normal subjects. Journal Of Internatıonal Advanced Otology , 8, 103-112.
Vogel, A., Maruff, P., Morgan, A. (2010). Evaluation of communication assessment practices during the acute stages post stroke. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 1183– 1188.
Wade, D.T., Hewer, R.L., David, R.M., Enderby, P.M. (1986). Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 49(1):11–16.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification for functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland.
