Üriner Sistem Taş Hastalığında Tanısal Değerlendirme
Özet
Üriner sistem taş hastalığında tanısal değerlendirme; hastanın tıbbi geçmişi, fiziki muayenesi, laboratuvar testleri ve çeşitli görüntüleme yöntemlerinin entegrasyonunu içeren kapsamlı bir süreçtir. Tanı aşaması, taş oluşumuna zemin hazırlayabilecek ek hastalıkların, beslenme alışkanlıklarının ve ilaç kullanımlarının sorgulandığı hasta hikâyesi ile başlar; bunu kostovertebral açı hassasiyeti gibi bulguların incelendiği fizik muayene takip eder. Laboratuvar çalışmalarında rutin idrar analizi, idrar pH'sı, kan biyokimyası ve enfeksiyon şüphesinde idrar kültürü uygulanırken, yüksek nüks riski taşıyan vakalarda 24 saatlik idrar ve taş analizine başvurulur. Görüntüleme yöntemlerinde ultrasonografi (USG); düşük maliyeti, radyasyonsuz ve invaziv olmayan yapısı nedeniyle özellikle gebelerde, çocuklarda ve takip hastalarında ilk seçenek olarak öne çıksa da üreter görünürlüğünde yetersiz kalabilmektedir. Günümüzde akut yan ağrısıyla başvuran hastalarda en yüksek sensitivite ve spesifiteye sahip altın standart yöntem kontrastsız bilgisayarlı tomografidir (BT). BT; taşın tam yeri, boyutu ve yoğunluğunun yanı sıra çevre dokulardaki patolojileri de net bir şekilde ortaya koyarak en uygun tedavi modalitesinin seçilmesine yardımcı olur. Son olarak üriner taşlar; anatomik yerleşimlerine, boyutlarına, radyoopasite özelliklerine, enfeksiyöz, non-enfeksiyöz veya genetik kökenli etiyolojik faktörlerine göre sınıflandırılarak kişiye özel tedavi protokolleri şekillendirilir.
Diagnostic evaluation in urinary system stone disease is a comprehensive process involving the integration of patient medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and various imaging modalities. The diagnostic phase begins with the patient's history, where comorbidities, dietary habits, and drug uses that may predispose to stone formation are questioned, followed by a physical examination evaluating findings such as costovertebral angle tenderness. In laboratory studies, routine urinalysis, urine pH, blood biochemistry, and urine culture in case of suspected infection are performed, while 24-hour urine and stone analysis are utilized in patients with a high risk of recurrence. Among imaging methods, ultrasonography (USG) stands out as the first choice, especially in pregnant women, children, and follow-up patients due to its low cost, radiation-free, and non-invasive nature, although it remains insufficient for ureter visualization. Today, non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard method with the highest sensitivity and specificity in patients presenting with acute flank pain. CT clearly demonstrates the exact location, size, and density of the stone, as well as pathologies in surrounding tissues, helping to select the most appropriate treatment modality. Finally, urinary stones are classified according to their anatomical locations, sizes, radiopacity characteristics, and infectious, non-infectious, or genetic etiological factors to shape personalized treatment protocols.
Referanslar
Pearle, M.S., et al., Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol, 2014. 192(2): p. 316-24.
Wimpissinger, F., et al., The silence of the stones: asymptomatic ureteral calculi. J Urol, 2007. 178(4 Pt 1): p. 1341-4; discussion 1344.
Fulgham, P.F., Urinary Tract Imaging: Basic Principles, in Campbell-Walsh Urology 10th edition. 2012. p. 105-139.
Jackman, S.V., et al., Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol, 2000. 164(2): p. 308-10.
Haddad, M.C., et al., Renal colic: diagnosis and outcome. Radiology, 1992. 184(1): p. 83-8.
Brisbane, W., M.R. Bailey, and M.D. Sorensen, An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol, 2016. 13(11): p. 654-662.
Johnston, R., et al., Comparison of kidney-ureter-bladder abdominal radiography and computed tomography scout films for identifying renal calculi. BJU Int, 2009. 104(5): p. 670-3.
Mitterberger, M., et al., Sonographic detection of renal and ureteral stones. Value of the twinkling sign. Int Braz J Urol, 2009. 35(5): p. 532-9; discussion 540-1.
Ray, A.A., et al., Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology, 2010. 76(2): p. 295-300.
Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík A, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis.European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis/chapter/guidelines [Accessed 15th March 2022].
Wu, D.S. and M.L. Stoller, Indinavir urolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol, 2000. 10(6): p. 557-61.
El-Nahas, A.R., et al., A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol, 2007. 51(6): p. 1688-93; discussion 1693-4.
Patel, T., et al., Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol, 2009. 23(9): p. 1383-5.
Smith, R.C., et al., Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996. 166(1): p. 97-101.
Moore, C.L., et al., Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus. J Urol, 2019. 202(3): p. 475-483.
Rodger, F., G. Roditi, and O.M. Aboumarzouk, Diagnostic Accuracy of Low and Ultra-Low Dose CT for Identification of Urinary Tract Stones: A Systematic Review. Urol Int, 2018. 100(4): p. 375-385.
Xiang, H., et al., Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2017. 61(5): p. 582-590.
Lin, W.C., et al., Value of automated coronal reformations from 64-section multidetector row computerized tomography in the diagnosis of urinary stone disease. J Urol, 2007. 178(3 Pt 1): p. 907-11; discussion 911.
Metser, U., et al., Assessment of urinary tract calculi with 64-MDCT: The axial versus coronal plane. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009. 192(6): p. 1509-13.
Zheng, X., et al., Dual-energy computed tomography for characterizing urinary calcified calculi and uric acid calculi: A meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol, 2016. 85(10): p. 1843-1848.
Potenta, S.E., et al., CT Urography for Evaluation of the Ureter. Radiographics, 2015. 35(3): p. 709-26.
Fulgham, P.F., et al., Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol, 2013. 189(4): p. 1203-13.
Committee Opinion No. 723: Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation. Obstet Gynecol, 2017. 130(4): p. e210-e216.
Masselli, G., et al., Stone disease in pregnancy: imaging-guided therapy. Insights Imaging, 2014. 5(6): p. 691-6.
Hoppe, B. and M.J. Kemper, Diagnostic examination of the child with urolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Pediatr Nephrol, 2010. 25(3): p. 403-13.
Kim, S.C., et al., Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res, 2007. 35(6): p. 319-24.
Wang, L., et al., Association Study of Reported Significant Loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3, 13q14.1 and 16p12.3 with Urolithiasis in Chinese Han Ethnicity. Sci Rep, 2017. 7: p. 45766.
