Özellikli Hasta Gruplarında Üriner Sistem Taş Hastalığı Tanı ve Tedavisi

Yazarlar

Ahmet Murat Bayraktar
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-8698

Özet

Gebelik, atnalı böbrek, ektopik böbrek ve üriner diversiyon gibi özel hasta gruplarında üriner sistem taş hastalığının (ÜSTH) tanı ve tedavisi, yapısal ve fizyolojik değişiklikler nedeniyle standart yaklaşımların dışına çıkılmasını gerektirmektedir. Gebelikte radyasyon riski sebebiyle tanı için ultrasonografi ilk sırada, MRG ise ikinci seçenek olarak tercih edilirken; konservatif tedaviye dirençli olgularda üreteroskopik lazer litotripsi veya stent uygulamalarına başvurulmaktadır. En sık görülen renal füzyon anomalisi olan atnalı böbreklerde, üreterin yüksek girişi gibi anatomik varyasyonlar üriner staza ve taş oluşumuna yol açmakta, tedavisinde ise ESWL, PNL ve RIRC yöntemleri kullanılmaktadır. Genellikle pelviste yerleşen ektopik böbreklerde taş tedavisi vasküler ve yapısal farklılıklar nedeniyle oldukça zorlayıcı olup; ESWL ve RIRC’nin yanı sıra laparoskopi yardımlı PNL ile %100’e yakın başarı sağlayan laparoskopik piyelolitotomi tercih edilmektedir. Radikal sistektomi gibi operasyonlar sonrası uygulanan üriner diversiyonlu hastalarda ise değişen anatomi, staz ve metabolik süreçler taş riskini artırmakta, tedavisinde üst üriner sistem taşlarında ESWL ön plana çıkarken, büyük taşlarda ultrasonografi eşliğinde perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) ve endoskopik yöntemler başarıyla uygulanmaktadır. Nüks riski yüksek olan bu hastaların takibinde düzenli irrigasyon ve metabolik değerlendirme kritik önem taşımaktadır.

Pregnancy, horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney, and urinary diversion represent special patient groups where the diagnosis and treatment of urinary system stone disease (USSD) require deviating from standard approaches due to structural and physiological alterations. Due to radiation risks during pregnancy, ultrasonography is the primary choice for diagnosis, and MRI is the second option, whereas ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy or stent applications are performed in cases resistant to conservative management. In horseshoe kidneys, which are the most common renal fusion anomaly, anatomical variations such as high insertion of the ureter lead to urinary stasis and stone formation, and ESWL, PCNL, and RIRS methods are utilized for their treatment. Stone treatment in ectopic kidneys, which are generally located in the pelvis, is highly challenging due to vascular and structural variations; hence, along with ESWL and RIRS, laparoscopy-assisted PCNL and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, providing nearly 100% success, are preferred. In patients with urinary diversion performed after operations like radical cystectomy, altered anatomy, stasis, and metabolic processes increase the risk of stone formation, where ESWL stands out for upper urinary tract stones, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under ultrasound guidance as well as endoscopic methods are successfully applied for large stones. Regular irrigation and metabolic evaluation are of critical importance during the follow-up of these patients with a high risk of recurrence.

Referanslar

Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík A, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis.European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis/chapter/guidelines [Accessed 15th March 2022].

Somani BK, Dellis A, Liatsikos E, et al. Review on diagnosis and management of urolithiasis in pregnancy: an ESUT practical guide for urologists. World Journal of Urology. 2017;35(11): 1637–1649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2037-1.

Swartz MA, Lydon-Rochelle MT, Simon D, et al. Admission for nephrolithiasis in pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;109(5): 1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000259941.90919.c0.

Dai JC, Nicholson TM, Chang HC, et al. Nephrolithiasis in Pregnancy: Treating for Two. Urology.2021;151:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.097.

Ross AE, Handa S, Lingeman JE, et al. Kidney stones during pregnancy: an investigation into stone composition. UrologicalResearch.2008;36(2):99–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-008-0138-4.

Charalambous S, Fotas A, Rizk DEE. Urolithiasis in pregnancy. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction.2009;20(9):1133–1136.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0920-z.

Elwagdy S, Ghoneim S, Moussa S, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) methods in the evaluation of calcular and non-calcular ureteric obstructive uropathy. World Journal of Urology. 2008;26(3): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0241-8.

MacNeily AE, Goldenberg SL, Allen GJ,et al. Sonographic visualization of the ureter in pregnancy. The JournalofUrology.1991;146(2):298–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37775-3.

Srirangam SJ, Hickerton B, Van Cleynenbreugel B. Management of urinary calculi in pregnancy: a review. Journal of Endourology. 2008;22(5): 867–875. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0086.

Watterson JD, Girvan AR, Beiko DT, et al. Ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: an emerging definitive management strategy for symptomatic ureteral calculi in pregnancy. Urology. 2002;60(3): 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01751-x.

Tan YK, Cha DY, Gupta M. Management of stones in abnormal situations. The Urologic Clinics of North America. 2013;40(1): 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2012.10.001.

Alan J. Wein, Louis R. Kavoussi, Alan W. [eds.]. Campbell Walsh Urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016.

Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Handa SE, et al. The presence of horseshoe kidney does not affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology. 2008;22(6): 1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0051.

Raj GV, Auge BK, Weizer AZ, et al. Percutaneous management of calculi within horseshoe kidneys. The Journal of Urology. 2003;170(1):48–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000067620.60404.2d.

Atis G, Resorlu B, Gurbuz C, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with horseshoe kidneys. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(1): 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0534-7.

Wu J, Shen J. The safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal lithiasis in pelvic ectopic kidney: an exploratory pilot study. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2021;10(4): 1734–1742. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-77.

Talic RF. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy monotherapy in renal pelvic ectopia. Urology. 1996;48(6): 857–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00316-0.

Fayad ASE. Retrograde holmium:YAG laser disintegration of stones in pelvic ectopic kidneys: would it minimize the risk of surgery? Journal of Endourology. 2008;22(5): 919–922. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0289.

Bozkurt OF, Tepeler A, Sninsky B, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of kidney stone within pelvic ectopic kidney. Urology. 2014;84(6): 1285–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.041.

Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Watkins SL, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ectopic kidneys: Over, around, or through. Urology.2006;67(3):513–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.056.

Gross AJ, Fisher M. Management of stones in patients with anomalously sited kidneys. Current Opinion in Urology. 2006;16(2):100–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mou.0000193380.16480.e1.

Goel R, Yadav R, Gupta NP, Aron M. Laparoscopic assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in ectopic kidneys: two different techniques. International Urology and Nephrology. 2006;38(1): 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-3611-9.

Elbahnasy AM, Elbendary MA, Radwan MA, et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in selected patients with ectopic pelvic kidney: a feasible minimally invasive treatment option. Journal of Endourology. 2011;25(6): 985–989. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0521.

El-Assmy A, El-Nahas AR, Mohsen T, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi in patients with cystectomy and urinary diversion. Urology. 2005;66(3): 510–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.008.

el-Nahas AR, Eraky I, el-Assmy AM, et al. Percutaneous treatment of large upper tract stones after urinary diversion. Urology.2006;68(3):500–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.065.

Wolf JS, Stoller ML. Management of upper tract calculi in patients with tubularized urinary diversions. The Journal of Urology. 1991;145(2): 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38311-8.

Madersbacher S, Schmidt J, Eberle JM, et al. Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion. The Journal of Urology. 2003;169(3):985–990. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000051462.45388.14.

Matlaga BR, Shah OD, Zagoria RJ, et al. Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. The Journal of Urology. 2003;170(1):45–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000065288.83961.e3.

Hensle TW, Bingham J, Lam J, et al. Preventing reservoir calculi after augmentation cystoplasty and continent urinary diversion: the influence of an irrigation protocol. BJU international. 2004;93(4):585–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04664.x.

Gelecek

10 Mayıs 2022

Lisans

Lisans