Diyabetik Ayakta Minör Cerrahiler

Özet

Diyabetes Mellitus, kapiller dolaşımı ve sinir sistemini etkileyerek ayaklarda duyu kaybı, deformite ve iyileşmeyen ülserlere yol açan küresel bir sağlık sorunudur. Diyabetik ayak yaraları (DAY), yüksek tedavi maliyetleri, hastanede uzun kalış süreleri ve non-travmatik alt ekstremite amputasyonlarının en önemli nedenleri arasında yer almaktadır. Etkin bir yara yönetimi için glike hemoglobin (HbA1c) seviyelerinin hastanın klinik durumuna göre optimize edilmesi ve enfeksiyon kontrolü amacıyla doku biyopsisi veya küretaj ile bakteriyolojik inceleme yapılması kritik önem taşır. Tedavinin temel taşını, etkilenen uzvun yükünün bireysel boşaltma bandajları veya ortezlerle hafifletilmesi ile cansız dokuların cerrahi olarak tamamen uzaklaştırılması (radikal debridman) oluşturur. Klasik cerrahi debridmana ek olarak; larva tedavisi, enzimatik, ultrasonik, basınçlı su ve negatif basınçlı yara tedavisi (NBT) gibi yenilikçi minör cerrahi yöntemler süreci desteklemektedir. İskemik olgularda acil revaskülarizasyon ve anjiyo cerrahi konsültasyonu gerekirken, osteomiyelit varlığında kemik rezeksiyonu ve uzun süreli antibiyotik tedavisi uygulanır. Multidisipliner bir yaklaşım, sürekli podiatrik bakım, hastanın eğitimi ve özel ortopedik ayakkabı kullanımı, yaraların tekrarlamasını ve amputasyon riskini önlemede hayati bir rol oynamaktadır.

Diabetic Mellitus is a global health issue that affects capillary circulation and the nervous system, leading to sensory loss, deformities, and non-healing ulcers in the feet. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are major causes of high treatment costs, prolonged hospitalizations, and non-traumatic lower extremity amputations. For effective wound management, optimizing glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels based on the patient's clinical status and performing bacteriological examination via tissue biopsy or curettage for infection control are critical. The cornerstone of treatment includes offloading the affected limb using individual pressure-relief bandages or orthoses, combined with the complete surgical removal of non-viable tissues (radical debridement). In addition to conventional surgical debridement, innovative minor surgical methods such as maggot-larva therapy, enzymatic, ultrasonic, hydrosurgery, and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) support the process. Ischemic cases require urgent revascularization and angiosurgical consultation, while bone resection and prolonged antibiotic therapy are applied in the presence of osteomyelitis. A multidisciplinary approach, continuous podiatric care, patient education, and the use of specialized orthopedic footwear play a vital role in preventing recurrence and amputation risks.

Referanslar

Bansal V, Kalita J, Misra UK. Diabetic neuropathy. Postgrad Med J 2006;82(964):95–100.

Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Stensel V, et al. A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer. The Seattle Diabetic Foot Study. Diabetes Care 1999;22(7):1036-42.

Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA 2005;293(2):217–28.

Pinzur, MS., & Schiff, AP. Deformity and clinical outcomes following operative correction of Charcot foot: a new classification with implications for treatment. Foot & ankle international. 2018;39(3):265-270.

Tiaka EK, Papanas N, Manolakis AC, et al. The role of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Angiology 2012;63(4):302-314. CrossRef

Arıcan Ö ve Şaşmaz S. Diyabetik Hastalarda Ayak Bakımı. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2004; 24(5):541-546

Ortegon MM, Redekop WK, Niessen LW. Cost-Effectiveness of Prevention and Treatment of the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:901-907

Arslan M. Diyabetik Ayak Sorunları ve Güncel Tedavisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Endocrin 2003; 1(3)

Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140-149.

Armstrong DG. An overview of foot infections in diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Sep; 13 (9): 951-7.

Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJ, Armstrong DG, Deery HG, Embil JM, Joseph WS, Karchmer AW, Pinzur MS, Senneville E. 2012 infectious diseases American association clinic for diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot application guide infections. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013 January-February; 103 (1): 2-7.

Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Aleksandrov AA, et al. Algorithms of Specialized Medical Care for Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Diabetes mellitus. 2011;14(3):2-72.

Cavanagh PR, Bus SA. Drain and cure diabetic foot to prevent ulcer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jan; 127 Special Issue 1: 248-256.

Lavery LA, Higgins KR, La Fontaine J, et al. Random clinical study to compare total contact casts, healing sandals, and tear reducer removable boot for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2014 Feb;21. doi: 10.1111 / iwj.12213. [Prepress epub]

World Association of Wound Healing Associations (WUWHS) “Local management of the diabetic foot ulcers”. Place the document Florence: Wounds international. 2016

Sun X, Jiang K, Chen J, et al. Systematic review of maggot debri-dement therapy for chronically infected wounds and ulcers. Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;25:32.

Kawabata T, Mitsui H, Yokota M, et al. Induction of antibacteri-al activity in larvae of the blowfly Lucilia sericata by an infected environment. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2010;24(4):375-381, .

Rogers AA, Burnett S, Moore JC, et al. Involvement of proteolytic enzymes, plasminogen activators, and matrix metal-loproteinases levels in the pathology of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 1995;3:273-283.

Stanisic MM, Provo BJ, Larson DL, et al. Wound debridement with 25 kHz ultrasound Adv Skin Wound Care 2005;18:484-490.

Hong CC, Nather A, Lee JK, et al. Hydro-surgery is Effective for Debridement of Diabetic Foot Wounds. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2014 Aug;43(8):395-359.

Bahr S, Mustafi N, Hattig P, et al. Clinical efficacy of a new monofilament fibre-containing wound debride-ment product. J Wound Care. 2011;20:242-253.

Trial C, Brancati A, Marnet O, et al. Coblati-on technology for surgical wound debridement: principle, experimental data, and technical data. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2012 Dec;11(4):286-292.

Zhang J, Hu ZC, Chen D, et al. Effectiveness and safety of negative-pressure wound therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 2014 Jul [cited 2014 Aug 1];134(1):141-151.

Snyder RJ, Kirsner RS, Warriner RA 3rd, et al. Consensus Recommendations for advancing standard care for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Ostomy Wound Management. 2010 April; 56 (4):1-24.

Gordon KA, Lebrun EA, Tomic-Canic M, et al. The role of surgical debridement in healing diabetic foot ulcers. Skinned. 2012 January-February;10(1):24-6.

Sumpio BE, Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, et al. Vascular Surgery Association; American Podiatric Medical Association. The management of the diabetic foot of the interdisciplinary team approach: Society for Vascular Surgery and the Society for the Society and the American Podiatric Medical Association J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010 July-August;100(4): 309-311.

Wukich DK, Armstrong DG, Attinger CE, et al. Inpatient management diabetic foot diseases: a clinical guide. Diabetes care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2862-2871.

Edwards J, Stapley S. Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database SistiRev. 2010(1). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003556.pub2

López-de-Andrés A, Martínez-Huedo MA, Carrasco-Garrido P, et al. Trends in lower limb amputations in people with and without diabetes in Spain, 2001-2008. Diabetes care. 2011;34(7): 1570-1576. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0077

Monteiro-Soares M1, Martins-Mendes D, Vaz-Carneiro A, et al. Classification systems for lower limb amputation prediction in active persons diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014 Feb12. doi: 10.1002 / dmrr.2535. [Prepress epub]

Naghi J, Yalvac EA, Pourdjabbar A, et al. New developments in the clinical use of drug-coated balloon catheters in peripheral arterial disease. Medical devices (Auckland, NZ). 2016 Jun 28;9:161-74. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S86473.

Percival SL, Hill KE, Williams DW, et al. A review of scientific evidence for biofilms in Wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(5): 647-657.

Peters EJ, Lipsky BA. Diagnosis and management of diabetic ambulatory infection. Mid Clin North Am. 2013;97(5): 911-946.

Bakker K, Apelqvist J, Schaper NC. Practical guidelines for management and prevention diabetic foot 2011. Diab Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(1): 225-231.

Barshes NR, Sigireddi M, Wrobel JS, et al. The System of Care for the Diabetic Foot: Objectives, Outcomes and Opportunities. Diabetic Foot & Ankle. 2013;4

Schaper NC, Apelqvist J, Bakker K. Reducing lower leg amputations in diabetes: challenge for patients, healthcare providers and the healthcare system. Diabetology. 2012 July; 55(7):1869-1872.

Dorresteijn JA, Kriegsman DM, Assendelft WJ, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 16;2014(12). doi: 10.1002/14651858.

Feinglass J, Shively VP, Martin GJ, et al. How Can lower limb amputations be "Prevented"? Factors promoting a qualitative study of the patient's perceptions. Disabled Rehabil. 2012;34:2158-2165.

Sayfalar

283-295

Gelecek

13 Haziran 2022

Lisans

Lisans