Düşük Doz Radyasyonun Etkileri
Özet
Radyasyonun tıp alanındaki teşhis ve tedavi uygulamalarında geniş yer bulması, insan sağlığı üzerindeki etkilerinin derinlemesine incelenmesini zorunlu kılmıştır. Düşük doz radyasyonun etkileri üzerine yapılan araştırmalar, iyonize radyasyonun moleküler düzeyde hem direkt hem de indirekt mekanizmalarla DNA hasarına yol açabileceğini, özellikle aktif bölünen hematopoetik ve lenfoid sistem hücrelerinin bu etkilere karşı en hassas yapılar olduğunu göstermektedir. Hücre düzeyindeki biyolojik yanıtlar; belirli bir eşik değeri olan deterministik etkiler ve kanser oluşumu gibi bir eşik değeri bulunmayan stokastik etkiler olarak ikiye ayrılmaktadır. Akut maruziyetler ciddi radyasyon sendromlarına yol açarken, kronik maruziyetler tıp çalışanları ve toplum için belirlenen katı doz sınırları çerçevesinde izlenmektedir. Düşük doz radyasyonun etkilerine dair en dikkat çekici tartışmalardan biri, yüksek dozda zararlı olan bir ajanın düşük dozlarda koruyucu veya faydalı etkiler gösterebileceğini savunan "hormesis" teorisidir. Çalışmalar, düşük dozların hücresel onarım mekanizmalarını uyararak adaptif yanıtlar üretebileceğini ve radyoterapi alanının uzağındaki tümörlerin gerilemesini sağlayan "abskopal etki" gibi immünolojik süreçleri tetikleyebileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ancak, düşük doz radyasyonun kümülatif kanser riskleri tam olarak netleşmediğinden, gereksiz tanısal tetkiklerden kaçınılması ve güvenlik protokollerine harfiyen uyulması hayati önem taşımaktadır.
The widespread adoption of radiation in diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures has necessitated an exhaustive evaluation of its long-term effects on human health. Research on low-dose radiation reveals that ionizing radiation induces molecular damage through direct and indirect mechanisms, causing DNA strand breaks, with actively dividing cells like hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues exhibiting the highest radiosensitivity. Biological consequences are categorized into deterministic effects, which possess a specific dose threshold, and stochastic effects, such as carcinogenesis, which lack a definitive threshold but increase in probability with higher exposure. While acute high-dose exposures manifest as acute radiation syndrome, chronic low-dose occupational exposures among healthcare workers are strictly monitored under established dose limits. A pivotal concept in this domain is "hormesis," which posits that low-dose radiation can stimulate cellular defense and DNA repair mechanisms, potentially yielding protective or beneficial health outcomes contrary to the linear no-threshold model. Furthermore, low-dose exposure can trigger complex immunological pathways, including the "abskopal effect," where non-irradiated distant tumors undergo regression. Nevertheless, because the precise carcinogenic risks of cumulative low-dose exposures remain uncertain, prioritizing radiation safety, minimizing superfluous diagnostic examinations, and strictly adhering to protective protocols remain imperative.
Referanslar
Bolus NE. Basic review of radiation biology and terminology. J Nucl Med Technol. 2001 Jun;29(2):67-73; test 76-7.
Gökharman FD, Aydın S, Koşar PN. Radyasyon güvenliğinde mesleki olarak bilmemiz gerekenler. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Derg. 2016;7(2):35–40.
Kaya A. İyonize radyasyonun biyolojik etkileri. Dicle Med J. 2002;29(3):65–75.)
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee for Review and Evaluation of the Medical Use Program of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; Gottfried KLD, Penn G, editors. Radiation In Medicine: A Need For Regulatory Reform. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1996. G, History of Radiation Regulation in Medicine. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232703
Selzer E, Hebar A. Basic principles of molecular effects of irradiation. Wien Med Wonchenschr 2012;162:47-54.
Yeyin N. Radyasyonun biyolojik etkileri. Nucl Med Semin.2015;3:139–143
Daşdağ S. İyonlaştırıcı radyasyonlar ve kanser. Dicle Med J. 2010;37(2):177–85.
Dönmez S. Radyasyon tespiti ve ölçümü. Nucl Med Semin. 2017; 3:172–7
Gökoğlan E, Ekinci M, Özgenç E. et al. Radyasyon ve İnsan Sağlığı Üzerindeki Etkileri. Anatolian Clinic the Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;25 (3): 289-294
Socol Y. Reconsidering health consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Dose Response. 2015;13(1). doi:10.2203/doseresponse.14-040.Socol
Küçük J. Çernobil kazası, konjenital anomaliler ve diğer üreme sonuçları. Pediatrik ve Perinatal Epidemiyoloj.1993; 7(2): 121–51.
Bozbıyık A, Özdemir Ç, Hancı H. Radyasyon yaralanmaları ve korunma yöntemleri. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Derg.2002;11(7):272–4.
Dauer LT, Brooks AL, Hoel DG et al. Review and evaluation of updated research on the health effects associated with low-dose ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Jul;140(2):103-36.
Vaiserman A, Koliada A, Zabuga O et al. Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues. Dose Response. 2018;16(3):1559325818796331.
Cohen BL. Dose-response relationship for radiation carcinogenesis in the low-dose region. Int Arch Occup Environ Health.1994;66(2):71-7
Szumiel I.Radiation hormesis: autophagy and other cellular mechanisms. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012;88(9):619-628.
BEIR (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation) VII Phase 2 Report. Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2006
Tubiana M, Aurengo A. Dose–effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionising radiation: the Joint Report of the Academie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Academie Nationale de Medecine. Int J Low Radiat. 2006;2: 135-153.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2016 Report to the General Assembly, With Scientific Annexes. New York, NY: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2017
Azzam EI, Colangelo NW, Domogauer JD et al. Is ionizing radiation harmful at any exposure? An echo that continues to vibrate. Health Phys. 2016;110(3):249-251
Calabrese EJ, Bachmann KA, Bailer AJ, et al. Biological stress response terminology: integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose– response framework. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222(1):122-128.
Feinendegen LE, Pollycove M, Neumann RD. Whole-body responses to low-level radiation exposure: new concepts in mammalian radiobiology. Exp Hematol. 2007;35(4 suppl 1):37-46.
Kaushik N, Kim MJ, Kim RK, et al. Low-dose radiation decreases tumor progression via the inhibition of the JAK1/STAT3 signaling axis in breast cancer cell lines. Sci Rep. 2017;27;7(1):1-9.
Scott BR, Belinsky SA, Leng S et al. Radiation-stimulated epigenetic reprogramming of adaptiveresponse genes in the lung: an evolutionary gift for mounting adaptive protection against lung cancer. Dose Response. 2009; 7(2):104-131
Merrifield M, Kovalchuk O. Epigenetics in radiation biology: a new research frontier. Front Genet. 2013;4:40.
Kadhim M, Salomaa S, Wright E, et al. Non-targeted effects of ionising radiation—implications for low dose risk. Mutat Res. 2013;752(2):84-98.
Sacks B, Meyerson G, Siegel JA. Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors). Biol Theory. 2016;11: 69-101.
Calabrese EJ. Biphasic dose responses in biology, toxicology and medicine: accounting for their generalizability and quantitative features. Environ Pollut. 2013;182:452-460
Tang FR, Loke WK, Khoo BC. Low-dose or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation-induced bioeffects in animal models. J Radiat Res. 2017;58(2):165-182.
Matanoski GM, Sternberg A, Elliott EA. Does radiation exposure produce a protective effect among radiologists? Health Phys.1987;52(5):637-643.
Abuodeh Y, Venkat P, Kim S. Systematic review of case reports on the abscopal effect. Curr Probl Cancer. 2016;40(1):25-37.
Imaoka T, Nishimura M, Lizuka D et al. Radiation-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rodent models:what’s different from chemical carcinogenesis? J Radiat Res. 2009; 50:281–93
Abbott A. Researchers pin down risks of low-dose radiation. Nature. 2015; 523:17–8.
Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D et al. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2006;44(4):245-51.
Dublin LI, Spigelman M. Mortality of medical specialists, 1938– 1942. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 1948;137(17):1519-1524.
Yoshinaga S, Mabuchi K, Sigurdson AJ. Cancer risks among radiologists and radiologic technologists: review of epidemiologic studies. Radiology. 2004;233(2):313-321.
Doll R, Berrington A, Darby SC. Low mortality of British radiologists. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(935):1057-1058.
Berrington A, Darby SC, Weiss HA et al. 100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes, 1897–1997. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(882):507-519.
Cameron JR. Radiation increased the longevity of British radiologists. Br J Radiol. 2002;75(895):637-639.
Preston DL, Kitahara CM, Freedman DM, et al. Breast cancer risk and protracted low-to-moderate dose occupational radiation exposure in the US Radiologic Technologists Cohort, 1983–2008. Br J Cancer. 2016;115(9):1105-1112.
Hauptmann M, Mohan AK, Doody MM et al. Mortality from diseases of the circulatory system in radiologic technologists in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(3): 239-248.
Johnson KJ, Alexander BH, Doody MM, et al. Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(3):545-550.
Tubiana M. Computed tomography and radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):850-853
Liu SZ. Cancer control related to stimulation of immunity by low-dose radiation. Dose Response. 2006;5(1):39-47.
Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE. Low-dose radioimmuno-therapy of cancer. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008;27(2):169-175
Ootsuyama A, Okazaki R, Norimura T. Effect of extended exposure to low-dose radiation on autoimmune diseases of immunologically suppressed MRL/MpTn-gld/gld mice. J Radiat Res. 2003;44(3):243-247.
Doss M. Low dose radiation adaptive protection to control neurodegenerative diseases. Dose Response. 2013;12(2):277-287.
Ron E. Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys. 2003;85(1):47-59.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. 2000 Report, Volume 2: Annex G. Biological effects at low radiation doses. New York, NY: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2000.
Toma` P, Cannata` V, Genovese E et al. Radiation exposure in diagnostic imaging: wisdom and prudence,but still a lot to understand. Radiol Med. 2017;122(3):215-220
Siegel JA, Pennington CW, Sacks B. Subjecting radiologic imaging to the linear no-threshold hypothesis: a non sequitur of nontrivial proportion. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(1):1-6.
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9840):499-505
Walsh L, Shore R, Auvinen A et al. Risks from CT scans—what do recent studies tell us? J Radiol Prot. 2014;34(1): E1-E5
Normile D. Epidemic of fear. Science. 2016;351(6277):1022-1023.
Miller AB, Howe GR, Sherman GJ. Mortality from breast cancer after irradiation during fluoroscopic examinations in patients being treated for tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(19): 1285-1289
Ronckers CM, Land CE, Miller JS et al. Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders.Radiat Res. 2010;174(1):83-90.
Boice JD Jr, Preston D, Davis FG et al. Frequent chest X-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis patients in Massachusetts. Radiat Res. 1991;125(2):214-222.
Gomes M, Matias A, Macedo F. Risks to the fetus from diagnosticimaging during pregnancy: review and proposal of a clinicalprotocol. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(13):1916-1929.
Rakıcı SY. Kanser Tedavisinde İmmunoterapi ve Radyoterapi. Rize Tıp Dergisi. 2021;1 (1):16-27.
