Epİdemİyolojİde Gözlemsel Çalışmaların Meta-Analİzlerİ (MOOSE)
Özet
Meta-analizler, aynı araştırma sorusuna yönelik yapılmış farklı çalışmaların bulgularını istatistiksel yöntemlerle birleştirerek en güçlü bilimsel kanıtı sunan araştırmalardır. Sağlık bilimleri başta olmak üzere pek çok alanda kullanılan bu yöntem, literatürdeki çelişkili sonuçları ortak bir paydada buluşturarak karar vericilere güvenilir rehberlik sağlar. MOOSE rehberi, özellikle gözlemsel çalışmaların meta-analizlerinde şeffaflığı ve kaliteyi artırmak amacıyla geliştirilmiş, altı ana başlık altında 34 maddeden oluşan kapsamlı bir raporlama standardıdır. Bu rehberin kullanımı, literatür taramasından bulguların sunumuna kadar tüm süreçlerin eksiksiz ve tekrarlanabilir şekilde raporlanmasını sağlayarak bilimsel yayınların niteliğini yükseltir.
Meta-analyses are research methods that provide the strongest scientific evidence by combining findings from different studies on the same research question using statistical techniques. Used extensively in health sciences and other fields, this approach offers reliable guidance to decision-makers by synthesizing conflicting results in the literature into a common conclusion. The MOOSE guideline is a comprehensive reporting standard consisting of 34 items under six main headings, specifically developed to enhance transparency and quality in meta-analyses of observational studies. Utilizing this guideline ensures that all processes, from literature search to the presentation of findings, are reported completely and reproducibly, thereby improving the quality of scientific publications.
Referanslar
Crowther M, Lim W, Crowther MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2010;116(17):3140-6.
Haidich A-B. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia. 2010;14(Suppl 1):29.
Lee YH. An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians. The Korean journal of internal medicine. 2018;33(2):277.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 1996.
Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine. Jama. 2008;300(15):1814-6.
Group GW. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Bmj. 2004;328(7454):1490.
Elamin MB, Montori VM. The hierarchy of evidence: from unsystematic clinical observations to systematic reviews. Neurology: Springer; 2012. p. 11-24.
Bakioğlu A, Özcan Ş. Meta-analiz: Nobel; 2016.
Garg AX, Hackam D, Tonelli M. Systematic review and meta-analysis: when one study is just not enough. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2008;3(1):253-60.
Açıkel C. Meta-analiz ve Kanıta Dayalı Tıp'taki Yeri. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bulteni. 2009;19(2).
Stanley TD, Doucouliagos H, Giles M, Heckemeyer JH, Johnston RJ, Laroche P, et al. Meta‐analysis of economics research reporting guidelines. Journal of economic surveys. 2013;27(2):390-4.
Saglam M, Yuksel I. Program değerlendirmede meta-analiz ve meta-değerlendirme. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2007(18).
Kuru SA. Meta- Analiz. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. (42):215-29.
Golub RM, Fontanarosa PB. Researchers, readers, and reporting guidelines: writing between the lines. Jama. 2015;313(16):1625-6.
Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, Verhoog S, Bohlius J, Bramer W, et al. A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. European journal of epidemiology. 2020;35(1):49-60.
Johansen M, Thomsen SF. Guidelines for reporting medical research: a critical appraisal. International scholarly research notices. 2016;2016.
Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. Journal of family medicine and primary care. 2013;2(1):9.
Vandenbroucke JP. Strega, Strobe, Stard, Squire, Moose, Prisma, Gnosis, Trend, Orion, Coreq, Quorom, Remark… and Consort: for whom does the guideline toll? Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2009;62(6):594-6.
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Jama. 2000;283(15):2008-12.
McCulloch M. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: An illustrated step-by-step guide. The National medical journal of India. 2004;17(2).
Aviña‐Zubieta JA, Choi HK, Sadatsafavi M, Etminan M, Esdaile JM, Lacaille D. Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta‐analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Care & Research. 2008;59(12):1690-7.
Ahn E, Kang H. Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2018;71(2):103.
Olmos M, Antelo M, Vazquez H, Smecuol E, Maurino E, Bai J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on the prevalence of fractures in coeliac disease. Digestive and liver disease. 2008;40(1):46-53.
Fumery M, Xiaocang C, Dauchet L, Gower-Rousseau C, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Colombel J-F. Thromboembolic events and cardiovascular mortality in inflammatory bowel diseases: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis. 2014;8(6):469-79.
http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. [
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled clinical trials. 1996;17(1):1-12.
Corona G, Giagulli VA, Maseroli E, Vignozzi L, Aversa A, Zitzmann M, et al. Testosterone supplementation and body composition: results from a meta-analysis study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(3):R99-R116.
Young G, Albisetti M, Bonduel M, Brandao L, Chan A, Friedrichs F, et al. Impact of inherited thrombophilia on venous thromboembolism in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Circulation. 2008;118(13):1373-82.
https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman. [Erişim tarihi: 03.12.2021]
https://www.meta-analysis.com/. [Erişim tarihi: 03.12.2021]
Schwarzer G. meta: An R package for meta-analysis. R news. 2007;7(3):40-5.
Rosato V, Temple NJ, La Vecchia C, Castellan G, Tavani A, Guercio V. Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. European journal of nutrition. 2019;58(1):173-91.
Haghighatdoost F, Bellissimo N, de Zepetnek JOT, Rouhani MH. Association of vegetarian diet with inflammatory biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Public health nutrition. 2017;20(15):2713-21.
Kunadian V, Zaman A, Qiu W. Revascularization among patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: a meta‐analysis of observational studies. European journal of heart failure. 2011;13(7):773-84.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in medicine. 2002;21(11):1539-58.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj. 2003;327(7414):557-60.
Undela K, Srikanth V, Bansal D. Statin use and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2012;135(1):261-9.
Meltem S, Orhan F. Kanıt Piramidi Açısından En Önemli Araştirma Yöntemi: Meta-Analiz. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi.6(8):70-88.
Thompson SG, Higgins JP. How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Statistics in medicine. 2002;21(11):1559-73.
Komócsi A, Vorobcsuk A, Faludi R, Pintér T, Lenkey Z, Költő G, et al. The impact of cardiopulmonary manifestations on the mortality of SSc: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Rheumatology. 2012;51(6):1027-36.
Hatipoglu H. Sistematik derleme ve meta analiz. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Bilişim Dergisi. 2021;2(1):7-10.
Bax L, Ikeda N, Fukui N, Yaju Y, Tsuruta H, Moons KG. More than numbers: the power of graphs in meta-analysis. American journal of epidemiology. 2009;169(2):249-55.
Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis: Russell Sage Foundation; 2019.
Page MJ, Sterne JA, Higgins JP, Egger M. Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review. Research Synthesis Methods. 2021;12(2):248-59.
Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. An illustrated guide to the methods of meta‐analysis. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2001;7(2):135-48.
Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Jama. 2006;295(6):676-80.
Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994:1088-101.
Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and risk of cancer: an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Cancer medicine. 2015;4(12):1933-47.
Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel‐plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455-63.
Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L, Moreno SG. Assessing publication bias in meta‐analyses in the presence of between‐study heterogeneity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). 2010;173(3):575-91.
Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, Jones DR, Lambert PC, Thompson JR, Abrams KR. Evidence‐based sample size calculations based upon updated meta‐analysis. Statistics in medicine. 2007;26(12):2479-500.
Karlstad O, Starup Linde J, Vestergaard P, Hjellvik V, T Bazelier M, K Schmidt M, et al. Use of insulin and insulin analogs and risk of cancer—systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Current drug safety. 2013;8(5):333-48.
