Estetik Yüz Analizi
Özet
İnsanlık tarihi boyunca güzellik kavramı matematiksel, geometrik oranlar ve evrensel ilkelerle açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Fasiyal güzelliğin değerlendirilmesinde simetri, gençlik, cinsel dimorfizm ve ortalamalık gibi ögeler öne çıksa da hastanın yaşı, ırkı, cinsiyeti ve kişisel arzuları estetik cerrahinin nihai hedefi olan hasta memnuniyetini doğrudan etkiler. Yüz analizi geleneksel olarak yüzün yatay üçte bire ve dikey beşte bire bölünmesiyle iskelet dengesizliklerinin saptanmasıyla başlar; ancak bu neoklasik Yunan kuralları farklı etnik popülasyonlar arasında belirgin çeşitlilik gösterir. Klinik prosedürlerde bir kılavuz görevi üstlenen 1.618 değerindeki altın oran (phi), estetik cerrahi ve ortodonti gibi alanlarda sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Yüzün en çekici ve belirgin yapıları olan göz, kaş, burun, dudak, yanak ve çene bölgelerinin her biri kendine has ideal oranlara ve yaşlanma dinamiklerine sahiptir. Örneğin, pozitif kantal eğime sahip gözler, belirli geometrik metotlarla projeksiyonu hesaplanan burun yapısı ve dikeyde 1:1.6 oranına sahip dolgun dudaklar estetik standartları oluşturur. Sonuç olarak, estetik fasiyal analizde kullanılan bu standartlar cerrahi birer dayatma değil, her hastanın kendi etnik kökeni ve kültürel eğilimlerine uygun, doğal görünümlü ve dengeli bir yüz yapısı elde etmesini sağlayan esnek kılavuzlardır.
Throughout human history, the concept of beauty has been attempted to be explained through mathematical, geometric proportions, and universal principles. Although elements such as symmetry, youth, sexual dimorphism, and averageness stand out in the evaluation of facial beauty, the patient's age, race, gender, and personal desires directly impact patient satisfaction, which is the ultimate goal of aesthetic surgery. Facial analysis traditionally begins with the detection of skeletal imbalances by dividing the face into horizontal thirds and vertical fifths; however, these neoclassical Greek canons show significant variation among different ethnic populations. The golden ratio (phi) with a value of 1.618, which serves as a guide in clinical procedures, is frequently utilized in fields such as aesthetic surgery and orthodontics. The eyes, eyebrows, nose, lips, cheeks, and chin, which are the most attractive and prominent structures of the face, each possess their own unique ideal proportions and aging dynamics. For instance, eyes with a positive canthal tilt, a nose structure whose projection is calculated by specific geometric methods, and full lips with a 1:1.6 vertical ratio constitute the aesthetic standards. In conclusion, these standards used in aesthetic facial analysis are not surgical mandates but rather flexible guidelines that enable each patient to achieve a natural-looking, balanced facial structure consistent with their own ethnic background and cultural trends.
Referanslar
Prokopakis EP, Vlastos IM, Picavet VA, et al. The golden ratio in facial symmetry. Rhinology. 2013;51(1): 18-21.
Heppt WJ, Vent J. The facial profile in the context of facialaesthetics. Facial Plast Surg. 2015;31: 421-30.
Bueller H. Ideal Facial Relationships and Goals. Facial Plast Surg. 2018;34(5):458-65.
Thomas JR, Dixon TK. A global perspective of beauty in a multicultural world. Jama Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (01) 7-8.
Harrar H, Myers S, Ghanem A. Art or Science?An Evidence-Based Approach to Human Facial Beauty a Quantitative Analysis Towards an ınformed Clinical Aesthetic Practice. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42(1):137-46.
Sim RST, Smith JD, Chan ASY. Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000; 2 (02) 113-120.
Torsello F, Mirigliani L, D'Alessio R, et al. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models. Prog Orthod 2010; 11 (01) 13-19.
Aksoy A. Estetik fasiyal analiz. Erişir F, Tuna Yalçınozan E, editörler. Fasiyal Plastik Cerrahi. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2021. p.1-8.
Kaya KS, Türk B, Cankaya M, et al. Assessment of facial analysis measurements by goldenproportion. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;85: 494-501
Holland E. Marquardt's Phi mask: pitfalls of relying on fashion models and the golden ratio to describe a beautiful face. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32 (02) 200-208.
Packiriswamy V, Kumar P, Rao M. Identification of facial shapeby applying golden ratio to the facial measurements: an inter-racial study in malaysian population. N Am J med Sci. 2012;4:624-9.
Shahbazi Z, Ardalani H, Maleki M. Aesthetics of Numerical Proportions in Human Cosmetic Surgery. World J Plast Surg. 2019;8(1):78-84.
Milutinovic J, Zelic K, Nedeljkovic N. Evaluation of facial beauty using anthropometric proportions. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014: 428250.
Branham G, Holds JB. Brow/Upper lid anatomy, aging and aesthetic analysis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23 (02) 117-127.
Pepper JP, Moyer JS. Upper blepharoplasty: the aesthetic ideal. Clin Plast Surg 2013; 40 (01) 133-138.
Lam SM, Karam AM. Supratarsal crease creation in the Asian upper eyelid. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2010; 18 (01) 43-47.
Yalçınkaya E, Cingi C, Söken H, et al. Aesthetic analysis of the ideal eyebrow shape and position. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273(3):305–310.
Griffin GR, Kim JC. Ideal female brow aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg 2013; 40 (01) 147-155.
Glass LRD, Lira J, Enkhbold E, et al. The lateral brow: position in relation to age, gender, and ethnicity. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 30 (04) 295-300.
Levesque AY, Torre JI. Midface anatomy, aging, and aesthetic analysis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2015; 23 (02) 129-136.
Mendelson BC, Jacobson SR. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek: facial layers, spaces, and the midcheek segments. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (03) 395-404.
Naini FB, Donaldson ANA, McDonald F, et al. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician and layperson. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41 (07) 839-846.
