Periampuller Bölge Tümörlerinde Radyolojik Görüntüleme
Özet
Bu makale, ampulla Vater çevresinden köken alan ve pankreas başı, ortak safra kanalı, duodenum ile ampulla tümörlerini kapsayan periampuller bölge tümörlerinde radyolojik görüntüleme yöntemlerini ve bulgularını incelemektedir. Genellikle 60-70 yaşlarında tıkanma sarılığı ve karın ağrısı ile belirti veren bu agresif tümörlerin anatomik karmaşıklığı nedeniyle ameliyat öncesinde kesin orijinlerinin belirlenmesi oldukça zordur. Tanı ve evreleme süreçlerinde ultrasonografi (USG), bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT), manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ve manyetik rezonans kolanjiyopankreatografi (MRCP) gibi yöntemlerden yararlanılmaktadır. İlk değerlendirmede kullanılan USG, gaz dökümantasyonu nedeniyle distal safra yollarını göstermede yetersiz kalabilirken; abdominal BT, lokal invazyonları ve uzak metastazları saptamada temel rol oynar. MRG ve özellikle non-invaziv bir yöntem olan MRCP ise pankreatikobilyer ağacın yüksek çözünürlükle görüntülenmesini sağlayarak lezyonların rezektabilite durumunun ve vasküler ilişkilerinin belirlenmesinde BT'ye üstünlük göstermektedir. Makalede ayrıca pankreatik duktal adenokanser, kolanjiyokarsinom, ampullar adenokarsinom ve nadir görülen duodenal adenokanserlerin kendilerine özgü radyolojik yansımaları, sinyal özellikleri ve kontrastlanma paternleri detaylandırılmaktadır.
This article examines the radiological imaging modalities and findings in periampullary region tumors, which originate around the ampulla of Vater and encompass tumors of the pancreatic head, common bile duct, duodenum, and ampulla. The exact anatomical origin of these aggressive tumors, which usually present with obstructive jaundice and abdominal pain at ages 60-70, is highly difficult to differentiate preoperatively due to regional complexity. Methods such as ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and magnetic resonance cholangiopankreatography (MRCP) are utilized in the diagnosis and staging processes. While USG, used in the initial evaluation, may fall short in demonstrating the distal bile duct due to bowel gas, abdominal CT plays a fundamental role in detecting local invasion and distant metastases. MRI and particularly MRCP, a non-invasive method, provide high-resolution imaging of the pancreaticobiliary tree, demonstrating superiority over CT in determining the resectability status and vascular relationships of lesions. Furthermore, the article details the specific radiological appearances, signal characteristics, and contrast enhancement patterns of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary adenocarcinoma, and rare duodenal adenocarcinomas.
Referanslar
Benhamiche AM, Jouve JL, Manfredi S, et al. Cancer of the ampulla of Vater: results of a 20-year population-based study. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. England; 2000;12(1): 75–79. doi:10.1097/00042737-200012010-00014
Albores-Saavedra J, Schwartz AM, Batich K, et al. Cancers of the ampulla of vater: demographics, morphology, and survival based on 5,625 cases from the SEER program. Journal of surgical oncology. United States; 2009;100(7): 598–605. doi:10.1002/jso.21374
Goodman MT, Yamamoto J. Descriptive study of gallbladder, extrahepatic bile duct, and ampullary cancers in the United States, 1997-2002. Cancer causes & control : CCC. Netherlands; 2007;18(4): 415–422. doi:10.1007/s10552-006-0109-4
Van Dyke AL, Shiels MS, Jones GS, et al. Biliary tract cancer incidence and trends in the United States by demographic group, 1999-2013. Cancer. 2019;125(9): 1489–1498. doi:10.1002/cncr.31942
Palazzo L. Staging of ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. Germany; 1998;30 Suppl 1: A128-31. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1001493
O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Manunga JJ, et al. Survival after resection of ampullary carcinoma: a national population-based study. Annals of surgical oncology. United States; 2008;15(7): 1820–1827. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-9886-1
Morris-Stiff G, Alabraba E, Tan Y-M, et al. Assessment of survival advantage in ampullary carcinoma in relation to tumour biology and morphology. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. England; 2009;35(7): 746–750. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.10.010
Sommerville CAM, Limongelli P, Pai M, et al. Survival analysis after pancreatic resection for ampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma: an analysis of clinicopathological factors. Journal of surgical oncology. United States; 2009;100(8): 651–656. doi:10.1002/jso.21390
Kim JH, Kim M-J, Chung J-J, et al. Differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas at MR imaging. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. United States; 2002;22(6): 1335–1352. doi:10.1148/rg.226025060
Chan C, Herrera MF, de la Garza L, et al. Clinical behavior and prognostic factors of periampullary adenocarcinoma. Annals of surgery. 1995;222(5): 632–637. doi:10.1097/00000658-199511000-00005
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. United States; 2008;58(2): 71–96. doi:10.3322/CA.2007.0010
Smith RC. Surgical treatment for ampullary carcinoma. [Online] The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery. Australia; 1999. p. 170–171. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01542.x
Cha DI, Kim YK, Choi S-Y, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: prevalence and diagnostic value of dark choledochal ring sign on T2-weighted MRI. Clinical radiology. England; 2014;69(4): 416–423. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2013.11.015
Qiao Q-L, Zhao Y-G, Ye M-L, et al. Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: factors influencing long-term survival of 127 patients with resection. World journal of surgery. United States; 2007;31(1): 136–137. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0213-3
Skordilis P, Mouzas IA, Dimoulios PD, et al. Is endosonography an effective method for detection and local staging of the ampullary carcinoma? A prospective study. BMC surgery. 2002;2: 1. doi:10.1186/1471-2482-2-1
Bakkevold KE, Arnesjø B, Kambestad B. Carcinoma of the pancreas and papilla of Vater: presenting symptoms, signs, and diagnosis related to stage and tumour site. A prospective multicentre trial in 472 patients. Norwegian Pancreatic Cancer Trial. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. England; 1992;27(4): 317–325. doi:10.3109/00365529209000081
Rivadeneira DE, Pochapin M, Grobmyer SR, et al. Comparison of linear array endoscopic ultrasound and helical computed tomography for the staging of periampullary malignancies. Annals of surgical oncology. United States; 2003;10(8): 890–897. doi:10.1245/aso.2003.03.555
Irie H, Honda H, Shinozaki K, et al. MR imaging of ampullary carcinomas. Journal of computer assisted tomography. United States; 2002;26(5): 711–717. doi:10.1097/00004728-200209000-00008
Jang KM, Kim SH, Lee SJ, et al. Added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of ampullary carcinoma. Radiology. United States; 2013;266(2): 491–501. doi:10.1148/radiol.12121106
Domagk D, Wessling J, Reimer P, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation. The American journal of gastroenterology. United States; 2004;99(9): 1684–1689. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30347.x
Li D. (2002). Molecular epidemiology. Douglas B. Evans, Peter W.T. Pisters, James L. Abruzzese. Pancreatic Cancer. (s. 3-15). Texas, Springer. ISBN: 9780387951850
Javadi S, Menias CO, Korivi BR, et al. Pancreatic Calcifications and Calcified Pancreatic Masses: Pattern Recognition Approach on CT. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. United States; 2017;209(1): 77–87. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.17862
Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, et al. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. United States; 1997;168(6): 1439–1443. doi:10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168704
Mergo PJ, Helmberger TK, Buetow PC, et al. Pancreatic neoplasms: MR imaging and pathologic correlation. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. United States; 1997;17(2): 281–301. doi:10.1148/radiographics.17.2.9084072
Chung YE, Kim M-J, Park YN, et al. Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. United States; 2009;29(3): 683–700. doi:10.1148/rg.293085729
Suthar M, Purohit S, Bhargav V, et al. Role of MRCP in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Causes of Biliary Obstruction. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2015;9(11): TC08-12. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/14174.6771
Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT and cholangiographic findings. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. United States; 2002;22(1): 173–187. doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.1.g02ja15173
Nikolaidis P, Hammond NA, Day K, et al. Imaging features of benign and malignant ampullary and periampullary lesions. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. United States; 2014;34(3): 624–641. doi:10.1148/rg.343125191
Fernandez-Cruz L. (2001) Periampullary carcinoma. René GH (Ed.) Surgical Treatment: Evidence-Based and Problem-Oriented. (s.18-31). Munich: Zuckschwerdt.
Chandrasegaram MD, Gill AJ, Samra J, et al. Ampullary cancer of intestinal origin and duodenal cancer- A logical clinical and therapeutic subgroup in periampullary cancer. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2017;9(10): 407–415. doi:10.4251/wjgo.v9.i10.407
Solej M, D’Amico S, Brondino G, et al. Primary duodenal adenocarcinoma. Tumori. United States; 2008;94(6): 779–786.
Wesecki M, Niemiec S, Radziuk D, et al. Primary duodenal carcinoma--case report. Polski przeglad chirurgiczny. Poland; 2015;86(11): 540–543. doi:10.2478/pjs-2014-0096
