Yoğun Bakımda COVID-19 Hastalarında Sıvı Yönetimi

Yazarlar

Hazan Dağlı Aslan
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1873-8516

Özet

Yoğun bakımda takip edilen COVID-19 hastalarında sıvı yönetimi, ARDS ve sepsis gibi klinik tablolar nedeniyle kritik bir öneme sahiptir. Ateş, ishal ve beslenme yetersizliği gibi nedenlerle artan sıvı kayıpları hipovolemik şoku tetikleyebilirken, septik şoka eşlik eden sitokin fırtınası da kapiller kaçak ve efektif sirkülatuar volüm azalmasına yol açar. Bu süreçte sıvı tedavisinin takibi canlandırma, optimizasyon, stabilizasyon ve de-eskalasyon olmak üzere 4 fazlı modelle yönetilmektedir. COVID-19'a sıklıkla ARDS'nin eşlik etmesi sebebiyle, akciğer ödemini ve organ yetmezliklerini önlemek adına sıvı resüsitasyonunda konservatif (kısıtlayıcı) yaklaşım tercih edilir. Hemodinamik izlemde statik parametreler (CVP, PAOP) yetersiz kaldığından; cilt beneklenmesi, kapiller dolum zamanı ve laktat ölçümü gibi klinik bulguların yanı sıra pasif bacak kaldırma, ekspiryum sonu oklüzyon ve sıvı yükleme gibi dinamik testler kullanılır. Sıvı seçiminde ise normal salin yerine plazmaya en yakın dengeli kristaloid solüsyonların tercih edilmesi önerilmekte; albümin mortaliteyi etkilemeden oksijenasyonu iyileştirirken, yan etkileri nedeniyle HES, jelatin ve dekstran gibi kolloidlerin kullanımından kaçınılması gerekmektedir. Sonuç olarak, aşırı sıvı yüklenmesi ile hipovolemi arasındaki hassas dengenin kurulması ancak yakın hemodinamik takip ile mümkündür.

Fluid management in critically ill COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit is of paramount importance due to clinical conditions such as ARDS and sepsis. While increased fluid losses from fever, diarrhea, and nutritional deficiencies can trigger hypovolemic shock, capillary leakage resulting from cytokine storms accompanying septic shock also reduces effective circulatory volume. This process is managed through a four-phase fluid therapy model consisting of resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation. Because ARDS frequently accompanies COVID-19, a conservative fluid resuscitation approach is preferred to prevent pulmonary edema and non-pulmonary organ failure. Since static measurements (CVP, PAOP) are insufficient for hemodynamic monitoring, clinical signs such as skin mottling, capillary refill time, and lactate levels, alongside dynamic tests like passive leg raising, end-expiratory occlusion, and fluid challenges, are utilized. Regarding fluid selection, balanced crystalloids are preferred over normal saline; while albumin improves early oxygenation without affecting mortality, colloids such as HES, gelatins, and dextrans should be avoided due to adverse effects. In conclusion, achieving a precise balance between fluid overload and hypovolemia requires meticulous, individualized hemodynamic monitoring.

Referanslar

Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Jama. 2020;323(13):1239-1242.

Efe S, İnal V. Hemodinamik Destek/Sıvı Yönetimi ve Monitörizasyonda Nelere Dikkat Edelim? . Türkiye Klinikleri COVID - 19 - Özel Konular. 2020;Cilt 1:41-46.

Malbrain M, Van Regenmortel N, Saugel B, et al. Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D's and the four phases of fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8(1):66.

Bagshaw SM, Brophy PD, Cruz D, et al. Fluid balance as a biomarker: impact of fluid overload on outcome in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2008;12(4):169.

Hoste EA, Maitland K, Brudney CS, et al. Four phases of intravenous fluid therapy: a conceptual model. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(5):740-747.

Malbrain ML, Marik PE, Witters I, et al. Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(5):361-380.

Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):854-887.

Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, et al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2020;97(5):829-838.

Roch A, Guervilly C, Papazian L. Fluid management in acute lung injury and ards. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1(1):16.

Mendes RS, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ, et al. Fluids in ARDS: more pros than cons. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020;8(Suppl 1):32.

Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):18.

Silversides JA, Major E, Ferguson AJ, et al. Conservative fluid management or deresuscitation for patients with sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome following the resuscitation phase of critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(2):155-170.

Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(24):2564-2575.

Messina A, Collino F, Cecconi M. Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(12):788.

Erdoğmuş A, Ak G, Karabak Bilal P. İntravasküler Volümün Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. Türkiye Klinikleri Yoğun Bakım - Özel Konular. 2021;7:13-23.

Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121(6):2000-2008.

Ansari BM, Zochios V, Falter F, et al. Physiological controversies and methods used to determine fluid responsiveness: a qualitative systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(1):94-105.

Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid! Crit Care. 2015;19(1):18.

Kreit JW. Volume Capnography in the Intensive Care Unit: Potential Clinical Applications. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(4):409-420.

Jozwiak M, Silva S, Persichini R, et al. Extravascular lung water is an independent prognostic factor in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome*. Critical Care Medicine. 2013;41(2):472-480.

Magder S. Balanced versus unbalanced salt solutions: what difference does it make? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28(3):235-247.

Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Evans DJ, et al. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):Cd000567.

Morgan TJ. The ideal crystalloid - what is 'balanced'? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19(4):299-307.

Uhlig C, Silva PL, Deckert S, et al. Albumin versus crystalloid solutions in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18(1):R10.

Martin GS, Mangialardi RJ, Wheeler AP, et al. Albumin and furosemide therapy in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Critical care medicine. 2002;30(10):2175-2182.

Martin GS, Moss M, Wheeler AP, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Critical care medicine. 2005;33(8):1681-1687.

Gelecek

11 Nisan 2022

Lisans

Lisans